• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

E#. Wait, what?

No matter how many ways you say it, E# IS the same as F. It isn't misinformation. The only difference comes when you are playing in two keys, that could just as easily be notated differently.

If I did my sheet music in Gb, how would that make it any different than if I did it in F#?

The choice between F# and Gb isn't the issue. It's when you start using incorrect enharmonic spellings that things get ugly:

Easy to read. Most musicians I work with would read this with no difficulty:

upload_2015-10-6_19-22-18.png


Easy to read. Again, most musicians I work with would read this easily:

upload_2015-10-6_19-23-30.png


Sounds the same, but really, really hard to read:

upload_2015-10-6_19-30-10.png


It is flat-out wrong to write an F for the second note of this example. Even the very best readers are likely to play the third example incorretly, and when you're writing charts that need to be read correctly the first time, that matters.

It is just as correct to say there "is no E#" as it is to say there "is E#."

With all due respect, that's just silly.
 
The choice between F# and Gb isn't the issue. It's when you start using incorrect enharmonic spellings that things get ugly:

Easy to read. Most musicians I work with would read this with no difficulty:

View attachment 703940

Easy to read. Again, most musicians I work with would read this easily:

View attachment 703942

Sounds the same, but really, really hard to read:

View attachment 703948

It is flat-out wrong to write an F for the second note of this example. Even the very best readers are likely to play the third example incorretly, and when you're writing charts that need to be read correctly the first time, that matters.

But they are still the same note.
 
two guys jamming together on a song and someone goes "What's the first note you just played on bass?" (1st fret on the E string) and the guy goes "F". It would be kind of weird to answer back with "E#".

That's because you probably aren't jamming in F# major or C# major... :woot:

Where as in Gb...
Concert Pitch - C Key of Gb Maj -->v/I = C (no sharp/no flat) / Gb

Sorry but in Gb major, there is no C.

The 4th note of the scale is Cb, not C. The fifth note is Db, not C.

This is getting really, really funny :thumbsup:
 
I took an online course of Music Theory with University of Edinburgh & it was great, but I got to the part about Modulation & raised my tone deaf ears in the air in surrender.

I can understand that but you are playing bass with tone deaf ears ... impressive ! As for modulation, listen to Iron Man by Black Sabbath, it is great exemple of modulation ( the moment the guitar solo start )
 
See, that's a common misconception. Yes when the notation calls for an E# you would play what is normally an F on your instrument, but you are in fact playing E# not F.

The reason it's an E# is you are in a sharp key that contains an F#...you can't have both an F and F# in any scale, so if the key calls for a note a half step below F#, that note is E#. Period. The same logic applies to B#.

The key of C# major contains an E# (in fact all the notes in the key are sharped, including B#) but many players will simply call the key as Db major instead. Db major does contain an F natural (flat keys only contain flatted notes, never sharped; the opposite is true for sharp keys).

When I go around the circle of fifths I usually name the keys this way, by flats rather than sharps:

C -> F -> Bb -> Eb -> Ab -> Db -> Gb -> B -> E -> A -> D -> G -> C

That avoids having to use E#, B#, etc. but you will find that in Gb major you have a Cb :roflmao:

That's the one major key where you're screwed either way... Whether you call it F# major or Gb major you get an oddball note:

Gb Ab Bb Cb Db Eb F

F# G# A# B C# D# E#

:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

your circle of fifth looks more like a circle of fourth