I appreciate your kind responses on the weight conundrum, folks. The reason I asked this question is because it was such a perceptible difference; yet, it didn’t make sense to me. It sort of defied logic and I am not a delicate flower. So, I was a bit perplexed.
This is the first time I ever noodled on an EBMM Stingray. I went on a short-scale “hoarding” spree a while back that included picking up the Sterling passive Stingray model, which is a fine instrument for the price point. But I was really blown away by the craftsmanship of the special that I played. I can see why this is a $2k+ instrument. And while I need to get my tiny two knob P-bass brain around the four controls, I do agree with you folks about the intriguing tonal possibilities this brand offers, in addition to the sexy finish options. So, I am still going to continue my research as the GAS has NOT dissipated.
BTW, a few of you noted that your HH models are lighter than the H. Might this be a function of slightly less body mass because of the additional control cavity routing for extra pup? I would like to track one of those down too, as the only HH that I own is a 2015 Gibson Thunderbird, which is the only version of that model with funky pups that have the “chunky” pole pieces similar to EBMMs (but MUCH less desirable ergonomics).
Thanks again!