TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
fenders arent that awesome, the hype is just hype in my opinion. I prefer warwicks to most fenders. Maybe guitar places keep pushing them on you because its their most carried brand of bass. Its all your own opinion though, some people pay 14000 for vintage fenders. Maybe there is an actually reason behind that.
Fender was quite simply the first to hit the markeIn the beginning, Fender created the Precision and the Jazz... and they were good.
Honestly 9 out of 10 basses have a Fender pickup configuration (P, P/J, J/J) and the Fender's have a signature sound that is the classic bass sound. Of course the Fender sound isn't for anyone, but it seems to fit most people well. The fact that most people play Fender (#2 bass maker in the world behind Ibanez now, although each company is geared toward different price ranges) means that most people are going to recommend what they know.
Fender was quite simply the first to hit the market....everything that has come after gets compared to the yardstick that is Fender....it's hard to fight 50 years of marketing and image
Producers and engineers know what they sound like and know what to expect from them as we have had 50 years worth of recordings to prove it....
Pretty much.. there was a time when Fender was electric bass.. when if you played bass you either played a Fender or an upright for the most part.. IMO there are other basses out there that sound and feel better than any Fender.. but of course all of that is subjective.. but it is interesting to me that particularly if you consider that a MusicMan bass is technically a Fender too, since he designed it as well.. like GE said... pretty much any bass that you will play has been touched by Leo Fender.. and there are certain things that will not change in order to get a good sound.. like where you would place the pups & bridges etc.. to get the best sound for bass.
That's my take.. and as others have said.. it is all up to you. I have a 77 Jazz that I have not played in about 7 years... mainly because I am just into 5s now.. but my point is that it is all about you.. and what feels good to your hands and your ears.. especially nowadays where so much can be done to manipulate the sound. Ironically Leo Fender also created some of the the first hybrid tube/solid state amps..
Fender is a proven commodity.. and yeah.. truth be told a lot of it is marketing..
Of course you're dead right. That's why "brand" of bass doesn't matter.
I'm not saying Fender is the greatest here - just saying that those who think the make of bass you play is important are totally mssing the point. And they should come and tell us why Fenders aren't great when they're even close to some of the Fender players who've done what they can't even dream of.
In other words - are you Jamerson or Jaco? No? Then stfu about Fenders, your opinion isn't worth ****.
Mex: suck as well. I know, because I hate mine and it even has Fralin PUPs!
then gibson should build a bass that a majority of bass players like as much.Gibson would kill for this kind of attention...
Hee hee. I guess you may have a point there, even though I'm not a mod for this forum (only Amps). Sorry if I reacted badly to some of the comments in the thread - people are, of course, perfectly entitled to their opinions, even when they're wrong.Damn. Now that there's moderation.
gibson should build a bass that a majority of bass players like as much.



GIBSON SG !!!!!! 
oh good, the race car analogy again! that would work if we were racing basses around the stage instead of making music with them. i've played my sx basses in 10,000 seat arenas before with bowzer. number of people who complained that i was using a cheap bass: 0.I am of the opinion that you have to be both good, AND use good quality gear. It's a point I made on the SX threads before: Top race car drivers don't drive a Yugo, unless it is heavily modded!
Rob17 said:The Fender design, to me, looks as if it was made by a 4 year old.
oh good, the race car analogy again! that would work if we were racing basses around the stage instead of making music with them. i've played my sx basses in 10,000 seat arenas before with bowzer. number of people who complained that i was using a cheap bass: 0.
So what you are saying is that in almost every field of endeavor EXCEPT bass playing, good equipment or gear matters?
Golf...they use the best clubs. Tennis, the best rackets. Running, the best shoes, construction, the best power tools, college, the best books, classical music, the best instruments. Target shooting, the best guns, archery, the best bows. Boxing, the best gloves, cuisine, the best ingredients, filming, the best camera...but when it comes to bass any old bass should work...and not just work but be exalted here on this forum? That makes no sense whatsoever.
know that there is a balance to be had... .
GIBSON SG !!!!!!
Now that's a good looking bass.
The Fender design, to me, looks as if it was made by a 4 year old.
Way to simple.
The only fender I like a little bit, is that marcus miller thing, but that's just because Mike Dean (from COC) had one and made it sound awsome.
I'll never own a fender.![]()


Haven't read the whole thread but I'll play the devil's advocate 'representative'. There are many in here that will testify to the fact that the old Peavey basses will stand next to a Fender all day long!![]()