. . . . Here is my setup with a Studio 40 on top ( i changed the grill cover) and a 40 v3 on bottom!!! This works so well for me!!! I played a big outside gig and actually had FOH ask if I could roll back the low end a bit!!! That made me smile!!
View attachment 3103077
At this time I do not run any of the stereo effects... I would love to..... but with my setup I EQ v3 almost as a sub so more of the low end..... With running out of the v3 to the house I get the studio setting that I set plus the EQ that I want from the v3.
Ahhhhhh . . . So, now I'm putting 40 & 40 together.
Yeah, if you EQ to a phat low tone for your own monitoring and that same tone goes to the FOH via the standard Rumble XLR, then no wonder they complain. That's probably the same reason some bassists write-off the Rumble for not having a "true DI". They've learned to suit themselves with the amp as monitor while sending a dry signal to the board for whatever the soundman wants to do to it.
Now, have you considered that you've got a very flexible "true DI"/XLR Out in your Rumble Studio? You could EQ your amps the way you do now for stage tone and simply send the FOH either the PRE (direct and unaffected signal) or the POST (including all onboard processing) OR, better yet, send him BOTH from the Rumble Studio and let him decide the mix of them that he wants to run! Huh? Right? And that's with the default settings of the Studio's line outs! What do you think? Might this help you? Or not, whatever you think.
I've learned to go for the punchy mids that cut through the mix on stage, which is usually louder than I'd prefer (for many reasons), and have my R500c send that with whatever level of overdrive I've selected for the song. The FOH can then fattened it themselves for their actual subs as they wish, but they're going to get my desired "warmth" versus "snarl" to start off with. I've never had an FOH request anything different than what I've sent them that way. But, maybe that's just me. I dunno.
Last edited:

