I'm going to match it up with an Ampeg 410HLF Portaflex cab that I ordered today.View attachment 3463141
I just got a Fender Rumble 800 head. Can I get a number?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'm going to match it up with an Ampeg 410HLF Portaflex cab that I ordered today.View attachment 3463141
I just got a Fender Rumble 800 head. Can I get a number?
Welcome!I'm going to match it up with an Ampeg 410HLF Portaflex cab that I ordered today.
The Fender Rumble 200 would be a good choice. It is within budget and if it isn't enough, your band is playing too loud.Hey all, so I haven't had time to read though the thread but I need some quick feedback here.
My guitarist wants to buy a bass rig (which I will be using for practice at her house).
Her stated requirements are:
- $300-$500
- Combo or small stack
- Loud enough for a small/medium gig
- To be used for rock and some metal (old school not Periphery etc.)
I immediately thought the best option in that price range might be a rumble.
So, I started searching for combos and got a bit confused.
I saw these, which all looked pretty good:
Fender Rumble 500 2x10" 500-Watt Bass Combo for $599
Fender Rumble 210 2x10" 700-Watt Bass Cabinet - Silver Grille for $399
Fender Rumble 410 - 4x10" 500-Watt Bass Cabinet w/Horn for $399
But the price of the first one is much higher, so maybe a newer model?
So anyway, is one of these a good choice? Or is there another rumble that might be better?
Or is there a non-Fender option that might be the best option?
I'm not stuck on combo, sweetwater, or Fender, so please recommend me your thoughts...
Thanks!
The Fender Rumble 200 would be a good choice. It is within budget and if it isn't enough, your band is playing too loud.

800 watts, 8 ohms.Welcome!
What's the power handling on those? 8ohm or 4ohms?
I agree. My 100c has always held up really well for rehearsals with a fairly loud band. Same for the few small venue gigs I've used it on. Between practice, reharsals, and small gigs it's my most used Rumble.
It kills me when people say a 100 isnt enough for rehearsal. I use a 25!
Comments like that don't help people choose the proper gear. Maybe in your opinion, but the Fender 200 is just not loud enough with a loud band. (Without an extension cab). Get an additional cab and it will be plenty. By itself, I had to turn it up too loud and it didn't sound all that great. I'm not trying to argue, but I felt nuts reading all the comments saying it was plenty loud enough. Truth is, it wasn't for me.The Fender Rumble 200 would be a good choice. It is within budget and if it isn't enough, your band is playing too loud.
Then you are playing too loud. Nothing wrong with my advice. I practice with a 3 piece with a 100 and it is plenty. There are many Rumble owners who gig with a 200 and no extension.Comments like that don't help people choose the proper gear. Maybe in your opinion, but the Fender 200 is just not loud enough with a loud band. (Without an extension cab). Get an additional cab and it will be plenty. By itself, I had to turn it up too loud and it didn't sound all that great. I'm not trying to argue, but I felt nuts reading all the comments saying it was plenty loud enough. Truth is, it wasn't for me.
I guess Fender really screwed up by making anything bigger than the 100 then? Maybe we should tell Fender that no one needs to be louder than a 100 Rumble?Then you are playing too loud. Nothing wrong with my advice. I practice with a 3 piece with a 100 and it is plenty. There are many Rumble owners who gig with a 200 and no extension.
You can have your opinion and state it, but you have no business denigrating my opinion.
Comments like that don't help people choose the proper gear. Maybe in your opinion, but the Fender 200 is just not loud enough with a loud band. (Without an extension cab). Get an additional cab and it will be plenty. By itself, I had to turn it up too loud and it didn't sound all that great. I'm not trying to argue, but I felt nuts reading all the comments saying it was plenty loud enough. Truth is, it wasn't for me.
What a nonsensical reply.I guess Fender really screwed up by making anything bigger than the 100 then? Maybe we should tell Fender that no one needs to be louder than a 100 Rumble?
The first of those is a combo, amp and speaker cabinet in one. The other two are only speaker cabinets, no amplifier.
I must be blind... Thanks for pointing that out...Well, the first is a combo amp, the other 2 are just cabs so you'd need a head. I have a Rumble 200c[combo], 200W, 1x15 that I use for many of our gigs-and used it outside yesterday. Currently $500. at Sweetwater, etc. Unless you're rehearsing at wall shaking volumes, it-or the R500c-would be plenty.
Thanks for the recommendation. I personally like having lots of headroom, and running an amp with the master on 2 doesn't bother me. In any case the audible difference between 200 and 500 watts is minimal.The Fender Rumble 200 would be a good choice. It is within budget and if it isn't enough, your band is playing too loud.
I prefer the sound of the 15 to 2x10s. I feel it gives better bottom end and I can EQ less lows if I need to for the room. Plus 1x15 is lighter on my wallet and my back. I do have a Rumble 112 extension cab* that I use in our larger venues, but it stays at home most of the time.I must be blind... Thanks for pointing that out...
Thanks for the recommendation. I personally like having lots of headroom, and running an amp with the master on 2 doesn't bother me. In any case the audible difference between 200 and 500 watts is minimal.
Volume aside, how does the Rumble 200c compare to the Rumble 500c in terms of features, tone and feel? A good strong defined tone in the mix, without boominess would be nice.
All the Rumbles from the 40 through the 500 share the same preamp. The 40 lacks effects send and receive. The main difference between the two is the 500 is 2x10 and the 200 is 1x15. As it happens, I was in a GC last week and tried the 200 (one of only two Rumbles I don't own. The other is a 15), and found the 15 in the 200 to be a warmer sound.I must be blind... Thanks for pointing that out...
Thanks for the recommendation. I personally like having lots of headroom, and running an amp with the master on 2 doesn't bother me. In any case the audible difference between 200 and 500 watts is minimal.
Volume aside, how does the Rumble 200c compare to the Rumble 500c in terms of features, tone and feel? A good strong defined tone in the mix, without boominess would be nice.
Even lesser amps, like Marshalls, have volume knobs. Really loud practicing gets you nothing other than hearing impairment.Everyone's needs are different, and I don't agree that if a Rumble 200C doesnt keep up then youre playing too loud....too loud according to who? I have the 500c and theres no way it would keep up in my band so I added the 210 Ext cab.
I like to have plenty of low end to compete with that Marshall half stack over there...LOL
Ah, ha! A new convert.All the Rumbles from the 40 through the 500 share the same preamp. The 40 lacks effects send and receive. The main difference between the two is the 500 is 2x10 and the 200 is 1x15. As it happens, I was in a GC last week and tried the 200 (one of only two Rumbles I don't own. The other is a 15), and found the 15 in the 200 to be a warmer sound.

Based on that description I think you'd like the 500. I was dead set on a 200.... until I tried a 500. Full and rich, crisp and clear. The 200 was warm, but one man's warm is another man's muddy, right?I must be blind... Thanks for pointing that out...
Thanks for the recommendation. I personally like having lots of headroom, and running an amp with the master on 2 doesn't bother me. In any case the audible difference between 200 and 500 watts is minimal.
Volume aside, how does the Rumble 200c compare to the Rumble 500c in terms of features, tone and feel? A good strong defined tone in the mix, without boominess would be nice.