• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fender Rumble Club

Hey all, so I haven't had time to read though the thread but I need some quick feedback here.
My guitarist wants to buy a bass rig (which I will be using for practice at her house).
Her stated requirements are:
- $300-$500
- Combo or small stack
- Loud enough for a small/medium gig
- To be used for rock and some metal (old school not Periphery etc.)

I immediately thought the best option in that price range might be a rumble.
So, I started searching for combos and got a bit confused.
I saw these, which all looked pretty good:
Fender Rumble 500 2x10" 500-Watt Bass Combo for $599
Fender Rumble 210 2x10" 700-Watt Bass Cabinet - Silver Grille for $399
Fender Rumble 410 - 4x10" 500-Watt Bass Cabinet w/Horn for $399

But the price of the first one is much higher, so maybe a newer model?
So anyway, is one of these a good choice? Or is there another rumble that might be better?
Or is there a non-Fender option that might be the best option?
I'm not stuck on combo, sweetwater, or Fender, so please recommend me your thoughts...

Thanks!
The Fender Rumble 200 would be a good choice. It is within budget and if it isn't enough, your band is playing too loud.
 
The Fender Rumble 200 would be a good choice. It is within budget and if it isn't enough, your band is playing too loud.
Comments like that don't help people choose the proper gear. Maybe in your opinion, but the Fender 200 is just not loud enough with a loud band. (Without an extension cab). Get an additional cab and it will be plenty. By itself, I had to turn it up too loud and it didn't sound all that great. I'm not trying to argue, but I felt nuts reading all the comments saying it was plenty loud enough. Truth is, it wasn't for me.
 
Comments like that don't help people choose the proper gear. Maybe in your opinion, but the Fender 200 is just not loud enough with a loud band. (Without an extension cab). Get an additional cab and it will be plenty. By itself, I had to turn it up too loud and it didn't sound all that great. I'm not trying to argue, but I felt nuts reading all the comments saying it was plenty loud enough. Truth is, it wasn't for me.
Then you are playing too loud. Nothing wrong with my advice. I practice with a 3 piece with a 100 and it is plenty. There are many Rumble owners who gig with a 200 and no extension.
You can have your opinion and state it, but you have no business denigrating my opinion.
 
Then you are playing too loud. Nothing wrong with my advice. I practice with a 3 piece with a 100 and it is plenty. There are many Rumble owners who gig with a 200 and no extension.
You can have your opinion and state it, but you have no business denigrating my opinion.
I guess Fender really screwed up by making anything bigger than the 100 then? Maybe we should tell Fender that no one needs to be louder than a 100 Rumble?

Sorry to poke the bear. I'll quit now. I do see your point, but some of us like it loud. It is good to know what gear will keep up with what we like.
 
Last edited:
Comments like that don't help people choose the proper gear. Maybe in your opinion, but the Fender 200 is just not loud enough with a loud band. (Without an extension cab). Get an additional cab and it will be plenty. By itself, I had to turn it up too loud and it didn't sound all that great. I'm not trying to argue, but I felt nuts reading all the comments saying it was plenty loud enough. Truth is, it wasn't for me.

i wouldn't find a rumble 200 without an extension speaker enough for punk or louder metal. i haven't tried one with an extension speaker, so not sure.
 
The first of those is a combo, amp and speaker cabinet in one. The other two are only speaker cabinets, no amplifier.

Well, the first is a combo amp, the other 2 are just cabs so you'd need a head. I have a Rumble 200c[combo], 200W, 1x15 that I use for many of our gigs-and used it outside yesterday. Currently $500. at Sweetwater, etc. Unless you're rehearsing at wall shaking volumes, it-or the R500c-would be plenty.
I must be blind... Thanks for pointing that out...

The Fender Rumble 200 would be a good choice. It is within budget and if it isn't enough, your band is playing too loud.
Thanks for the recommendation. I personally like having lots of headroom, and running an amp with the master on 2 doesn't bother me. In any case the audible difference between 200 and 500 watts is minimal.

Volume aside, how does the Rumble 200c compare to the Rumble 500c in terms of features, tone and feel? A good strong defined tone in the mix, without boominess would be nice.
 
The typical response you’ll get is that no matter which Rumble you use (or any amplifier for that matter), your best bet for reducing boominess is to add a high pass filter (hpf) set anywhere between 30 and 90 Hz

You can place this both before the input and inside the effects loop.

Personally, I place it both places (first in my chain and last in my chain before the power amp).

I use a Line 6 Helix with a Fender Rumble 200 and my chain typically looks like this:

Bass -> Helix HPF (at 80 Hz) -> Helix Compressor -> Rumble input -> Rumble effects loop send -> Helix HPF (at 80 Hz) -> Rumble effects loop return.

That is just a quick example but that allows me to completely sculpt the sound to my liking.

Using the Helix as a pre-amp also works and gives you a variety of models to choose from. You can even use the Rumble as a guitar cab because of the horn. It gives surprisingly good results. Just plug it directly into the effects return.

Feature wise, they are pretty much identical. You just get more watts with the 500 and a different speaker configuration (two 10s vs one 15).

They both sound good. One just has more headroom.
 
Last edited:
I must be blind... Thanks for pointing that out...


Thanks for the recommendation. I personally like having lots of headroom, and running an amp with the master on 2 doesn't bother me. In any case the audible difference between 200 and 500 watts is minimal.

Volume aside, how does the Rumble 200c compare to the Rumble 500c in terms of features, tone and feel? A good strong defined tone in the mix, without boominess would be nice.
I prefer the sound of the 15 to 2x10s. I feel it gives better bottom end and I can EQ less lows if I need to for the room. Plus 1x15 is lighter on my wallet and my back. I do have a Rumble 112 extension cab* that I use in our larger venues, but it stays at home most of the time.
*no longer made:(
 
I must be blind... Thanks for pointing that out...


Thanks for the recommendation. I personally like having lots of headroom, and running an amp with the master on 2 doesn't bother me. In any case the audible difference between 200 and 500 watts is minimal.

Volume aside, how does the Rumble 200c compare to the Rumble 500c in terms of features, tone and feel? A good strong defined tone in the mix, without boominess would be nice.
All the Rumbles from the 40 through the 500 share the same preamp. The 40 lacks effects send and receive. The main difference between the two is the 500 is 2x10 and the 200 is 1x15. As it happens, I was in a GC last week and tried the 200 (one of only two Rumbles I don't own. The other is a 15), and found the 15 in the 200 to be a warmer sound.
 
Everyone's needs are different, and I don't agree that if a Rumble 200C doesnt keep up then youre playing too loud....too loud according to who? I have the 500c and theres no way it would keep up in my band so I added the 210 Ext cab.
I like to have plenty of low end to compete with that Marshall half stack over there...LOL
Even lesser amps, like Marshalls, have volume knobs. Really loud practicing gets you nothing other than hearing impairment.
 
All the Rumbles from the 40 through the 500 share the same preamp. The 40 lacks effects send and receive. The main difference between the two is the 500 is 2x10 and the 200 is 1x15. As it happens, I was in a GC last week and tried the 200 (one of only two Rumbles I don't own. The other is a 15), and found the 15 in the 200 to be a warmer sound.
Ah, ha! A new convert.;):hyper:
 
I must be blind... Thanks for pointing that out...


Thanks for the recommendation. I personally like having lots of headroom, and running an amp with the master on 2 doesn't bother me. In any case the audible difference between 200 and 500 watts is minimal.

Volume aside, how does the Rumble 200c compare to the Rumble 500c in terms of features, tone and feel? A good strong defined tone in the mix, without boominess would be nice.
Based on that description I think you'd like the 500. I was dead set on a 200.... until I tried a 500. Full and rich, crisp and clear. The 200 was warm, but one man's warm is another man's muddy, right?

Now this was just a music store demo, so take it with a grain of salt. But I left the store feeling ho hum on the 200 and gassing for the 500.