• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fender Rumble Club

Hey @G-Dog thanks for this [Rumble LT25, Studio 40 & Stage 800] thread.
Ordered a Studio 40 yesterday, direct from Fender. They had the price tag cut way back for Cyber Monday.
Might still be on sale, if anyone's interested.


Hey, Oldy! @Old Garage-Bander, you are now member #1560 in the Fender Rumble Club. Congratulations and welcome. Please put that number in your TalkBass Signature for safe keeping. Then make yourself at home here and on your Rumble Club Wiki page, the repository of all Rumbling wisdom and knowledge.

I believe you've been an active Rumbler for quite some time but I don't see where, or know why, you've never got a number before. Anyway, I see you've already found the Rumble LT25, Studio 40 & Stage 800 sub-thread to discuss the bass modeling Rumbles. Good.

If you'd care to tell us a bit about yourself, such as your bass experience in general and your Rumble journeys in particular, I'm sure many here would be interested. We have all kinds here, but none more welcome. You know, we all love to ... ... ...

Rumble On!
.
 
somebody said flatwounds are mellow and dull. i say ok :)
new strings+cable day today
IMG_20221130_174253.jpg
IMG_20221130_150349.jpg

https://dorsy.ftp.sh/index.php/s/QazkJownAeteWKN
 
Well traded in my trusty 500 for the new Rumble 800! (Not the Stage 800 which I had and IMHO is the worst bass amp Fender ever made!)

I already have a Rumble 800HD head which I use with my 210 or 112 cabs, so I am familiar what this amp can do. Love that it is actually lighter in weight then the 500 due to the Neodymium speakers. Tone wise it sounds awesome, lots of volume, punch and warmth as I expected. Looking forward to start to gig with it!

View attachment 4888116

I've just ordered an 800 too! Was thinking of getting a Rumble 210 cab, but maybe I'll just keep my Rumble 500c and chain them together when needed. Has anyone done this? Any advantages/disadvantages over an external cab?
 
I've just ordered an 800 too! Was thinking of getting a Rumble 210 cab, but maybe I'll just keep my Rumble 500c and chain them together when needed. Has anyone done this? Any advantages/disadvantages over an external cab?

Congrats! Seems to be a lot of that going around.

Anyhoo... With a 210 hooked to your R800 you get 400W per cabinet (per pair of 10's). With your R800 daisy-chained to your R500 and NO extension cabinet, you get 400W out of you R800 cab and 340W from you R500 cab. You do the math... ;)

Tim
 
I've just ordered an 800 too! Was thinking of getting a Rumble 210 cab, but maybe I'll just keep my Rumble 500c and chain them together when needed. Has anyone done this? Any advantages/disadvantages over an external cab?


A. Like all Rumbles 500 and less, the R500c's Master is upstream of the FX Loop, thereby controlling the level of the Sending signal. So, an instrument cable from 500 Send to the 800 Return lets you control the whole stack from the R500c. :)

2. But the R800c's Master is downstream of the FX Loop, so it can turn down any Returning signal. But it's Sending level (I'm guessing here) is probably fixed! ... possibly at a fairly low-ish level!!! So, if my suspicions are correct, an instrument cable from the 800 Send must go to the 500's Input to get significant volume and, therefore, go thru the 500's preamp & EQ, where you may need to reduce Gain & stuff and control its Master separately. BTW, I would LOVE for any R800c owner to confirm or refute my assumptions here, please. :D

¥. If the 750w of the 800+500 stack isn't quite enough, you can add one, two (or even three) cabs for a total of 400+500=900w, or 800+350=1,150w or 800+500=1,300w!!! Yeah, the third cab doesn't increase the power, but does increase the SPL. :woot:
.
 
Last edited:
I have several years playing on my oldest set of EBCFs. Still not mellow unless I want them to be, and never dull.
aye, just changed a 1.5y/o Steve Harris set for a new rotosound flat 50-110. (they are reaaaaly heavy, but i am in standard D anyways)
As far as i remember theese are basically identical soundwise brand new.
The first couple of weeks are always ding-dang-zing-zang :D Regret a bit to change the old one, but it is now a nice backup set tossed to the gigbag if any of this breaks eventually.
 
I have several years playing on my oldest set of EBCFs. Still not mellow unless I want them to be, and never dull.
The only reason I replaced my EBCFs was that one broke after about a year and a half. I'm currently using SIT Power Flats. They're OK, but I'll be going back to the EBCFs early next year-if we're still working.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miles_ONeal
I still have one R115 and it moves some air :)...

Hello Mr Soul! I am a huge R115 fan. It is rugged as we need it to be, isn't it? I've rolled that thing down a rough city block and around the corner on those cab wheels. It is very musical in its voicing and not bashful to be heard. Lately I've been playing with a LOUD slamming drummer and two not too shy guitarists. (I love those young kids, hahaha.) The Rumble 115 still amazes me for the sound and portability at its price.
 
Hello Mr Soul! I am a huge R115 fan. It is rugged as we need it to be, isn't it? I've rolled that thing down a rough city block and around the corner on those cab wheels. It is very musical in its voicing and not bashful to be heard. Lately I've been playing with a LOUD slamming drummer and two not too shy guitarists. (I love those young kids, hahaha.) The Rumble 115 still amazes me for the sound and portability at its price.

I agree. My R115 isn't going anywhere. I would sell my Ampeg PF112 first and buy another R115, if I was gigging. Imagine the air movement with two R115's and an Ampeg PF350 with a tube preamp, comp and OD...
 
A. Like all Rumbles 500 and less, the R500c's Master is upstream of the FX Loop, thereby controlling the level of the Sending signal. So, an instrument cable from 500 Send to the 800 Return lets you control the whole stack from the R500c. :)

2. But the R800c's Master is downstream of the FX Loop, so it can turn down any Returning signal. But it's Sending level (I'm guessing here) is probably fixed! ... possibly at a fairly low-ish level!!! So, if my suspicions are correct, an instrument cable from the 800 Send must go to the 500's Input to get significant volume and, therefore, go thru the 500's preamp & EQ, where you may need to reduce Gain & stuff and control its Master separately. BTW, I would LOVE for any R800c owner to confirm or refute my assumptions here, please. :D

¥. If the 750w of the 800+500 stack isn't quite enough, you can add one, two (or even three) cabs for a total of 400+500=900w, or 800+350=1,150w or 800+500=1,300w!!! Yeah, the third cab doesn't increase the power, but does increase the SPL. :woot:
.

Thanks, great to know those differences around the master and fx sends. The R500c feeding the R800c would be the way to go for me, easy! 750 watts vs 800 watts is neither here nor there, so I’ll likely just keep the R500c rather than get a 210.
 
Hi Rumblers,

Anyone made the 'upgrade' from 500combo to the new 800? (not the stage)

Are there significant tonal improvements with the different speakers ?
Can you describe? ... ... ...


Yeah, Bill, there's a few here have done that. A few more have posted in this thread:

It appears that the tonal differences are fairly small, since they use headphones to detect them, ... or not.

... ... ... What wattage would be achieved if the 800 was paired up with a Rumble 210 can [cab?] 4 ohms?

Thanks!


Well, ... A. a Rumble 210 is 8 ohms, but two of 'em is 4 ohms and the R800c can run either one or two of 'em!! But, whether you add one, or two, 8 ohm cabs the total power is 800w continuous.

And 2. the R800c by itself, with no cabs, is 400w continuous.

Hope this helps.
.
 
Thanks, great to know those differences around the master and fx sends. The R500c feeding the R800c would be the way to go for me, easy! 750 watts vs 800 watts is neither here nor there, so I’ll likely just keep the R500c rather than get a 210.


Just remember, Mark, some of that stuff is just my assumptions. And you know what assuming does, right? It'd be great to hear from someone who's actually tried that stuff and shared what they found. [hint, hint] ;)
.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mark Hughes
Yeah, Bill, there's a few here have done that. A few more have posted in this thread:

It appears that the tonal differences are fairly small, since they use headphones to detect them, ... or not.




Well, ... A. a Rumble 210 is 8 ohms, but two of 'em is 4 ohms and the R800c can run either one or two of 'em!! But, whether you add one, or two, 8 ohm cabs the total power is 800w continuous.

And 2. the R800c by itself, with no cabs, is 400w continuous.

Hope this helps.
.

Thank you G-Dog.

I wont just to buy it yet then. 500c +210 cab is plenty for me. Just dont like missing out....
 

Latest posts