TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
i run the rotary eq basically flat and run the bass at 6-7, mids at 6-7, and treble at 6-7 with the presence switch outWoah thats aton of bass! I've been running the bass around 4 and I'm borderline drowning in it![]()
There's another one complete on the ebay for someone to gut out then. 675 bones.yep. they were a 2x12 combo and the compliment to the studio bass amp. a couple of years later, they came out with the super twin reverb, but i always preferred the ones without the reverb tank for a bass amp.
i run the rotary eq basically flat and run the bass at 6-7, mids at 6-7, and treble at 6-7 with the presence switch out
nope. i don't really have the desire to, but i wouldn't mind trying the new 300.![]()
I think the 100T's ability to drive the tubes at lower volumes and the being only 51lbs is appealing.
yep, and there's a couple others there too:
FENDER SUPER TWIN | eBay
1976 Fender Super Twin Amplifier No Reverb Tube Amp Model 2x12 Combo | eBay
it is, but i just prefer to have at least 200 watts for a bit more headroom.
For the added cost of a power amp (a few hundred bucks), you could have all the headroom you could want.
tried out the head only quickly. WOW tons of power/headroom. Smokes my MM hd130 head which is the closest thing to this in both volume and tone. will have to either build or buy a headcase and have it checked over. Sick volume for a guitar. What was Fender thinking????