I stick to fingers because that's what I'm good at. I could do a song like Roundabout a lot more justice using my fingers than if I tried to use a pick. I have a rather aggressive playing style when I want it, and can be quite percussive. I may not be able to exactly replicate the sound of a pick, but I can get pretty close.One thing I'm wondering is, when you guys and girls cover a song or other, will you also switch between finger and plectrum to get as close as possible to the original, or do you just stick to your preferred picking method?
I don't bother with original technique. Not because it's not a good idea, I just think I'd serve the song better by playing it well with fingers than playing it poorly with a pick.I tend to emulate the original technique. But these days, I'm covering Carole Kaye material and I keep going back to finger-picking. Not only does it make it easier for me, but I can't quite get her tone when plectrum picking, even though that's how she played it. I feel I'm much closer with fingers.
But that raises an interesting question in my mind. Many of us venerate the tone of the great players as well as their talent. But if they had the same choices of gear available to them then that we have available to us today, how many of they would have stuck with the tone they had? How many of them would have chosen to play on/through something different? It's just an opinion, but I think many of them would have made different choices.
even at that, i've always rigged my picks to allow me to hold onto them better because of such poor pick technique. i have it in my mind that i should become fluent/fluid with a pick before i....you know ---
. i may need some lessons. i watch bobby vega and i start thinking that he's having way more fun than me.