nickbass79 said:Please do! I'm a sucker for buckeye burl.
Looking forward to those pics. That's a real eye grabbing piece of buckeye. Very nice..
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
nickbass79 said:Please do! I'm a sucker for buckeye burl.
osmarokuma said:yep! i like the darker buckeye, but really any buckeye looks nice they all have their own character. I think it was supposed to ship this week but I told them to hold it for later (i don't want the ups/fedex people leaving a fodera in front of my apartment for a week!)
... I'm going to try and be a bit more patient with the MGS as I anticipate some challenges with the high-C string.

I still can't get it outta my head about Garey parting with his Koa6, sorry ..but I couldn't do it.
I found a pic of that bass with Vinnie playing it in the shop (I thought I had a few more), I wouldn't post it without the owners or Vinnies consent, but please post one Garey if you can.
People ought to see that bass one more time, fantastic work by Vinnie and all at the shop.![]()
Garey said:Here ya go!
The Imperial is standard. The Monarch seems about the same, but much lighter and all around more comfortable. I loved that Imperial, but after having a Monarch again (and a 34" scale) I remembered how much that shape suits me. I started out on Monarch 4's, went to a Monarch 5, to an Imperial 6. The Monarch 6 was like going home again : )
hey,
if i may, i think it's really important to give yourself some time when going to a 5- or 6-string bass. comfort with the instrument is not going to happen over night, especially if you've been playing 4-string (or 5-string) for a while. the ergonomics change a lot. so does the *mindset*, which may be more difficult in some cases.
a lot of the time i see people saying something like, "i tried a 5-string (6-string, fretless), but found i couldn't figure it out," i kind of feel like they didn't really give it time . . . or, perhaps, *make the commitment* to the instrument.
better folks than me can probably go back and forth, but i can't. but my bias also came from reading something aj said about exclusively playing 6-string if you were gonna go to 6-string (though some said he didn't . . . )and that's the route i took.
imho, etc.
oldfretless said:imho, the problem with switching back and forth is so much that we do is muscle memory. Made more complicated when drop tuning is involved. Just sayin' though, before everyone says they don't need the B, the fodera B is mind blowing, and you can find places to fit it in.
Nice. What specs on your MG?
osmarokuma said:its gna be walnut, buckeye top, ebony fingerboard,ash neck, 33" of course, 26 fret, D tuner, black hardware... did I miss anything? similar to the standard, some changes.
imho, the problem with switching back and forth is so much that we do is muscle memory. Made more complicated when drop tuning is involved. Just sayin' though, before everyone says they don't need the B, the fodera B is mind blowing, and you can find places to fit it in.
In a perfect world I think I'd actually be like Stueart (shh! don't tell him!) in that I'd have a single instrument spec and just know it inside and out.
I've owned a number of instruments with a great B-string. The quality isn't the issue, it is the change in gestalt when you add it. I find my approach changes between a 4 and a 5 - they are different instruments. It is an extra string that in some ways complicates the instrument (eg another string to dampen), and in other ways simplifies it (eg more notes available in a single position). Whether the B adds value depends on the player, not on the quality of the string (unless it is a crappy B-string).