- Dec 12, 2007
- 2,268
- 43
- Disclosures
- Endorsing Artist: Zon Guitars, Tsunami Cables, DR Strings, GK
+1 to Kwesi because I didn't think this thread would go 3 pages. Nice work and I dig your you tube stuff as well. Keep up the good work.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
As an addendum, I agree that 5's seem to be the new sweet spot. 6+ strings, tho, are still a little bit fringe. I lived with a 6 as my main instrument for about the last 10 years and definitely noticed life is a little harder with a 6 - somewhat fewer choices in terms of instruments and strings than with 5's.
I can't think of a reason for this except perhaps ergonomics. 6+ stringers are still a bit of a handful, so to speak, compared to a 5. Could be string spacing and so on. Technical adjustments may be another reason, particularly learning to mute strings - that was the biggest change I had to make when I went to a 6. You still have that constraint with a 5, but perhaps you can get away with it more on the 5.
Fender may be another reason - they have only one 6 string model (the Steve Bailey) and SB himself apparently didn't have a good experience with Fender regarding that instrument. He's gone over to Warwick now. But they make quite a few 5 string basses now. The 4 is still their bread and butter, tho.
If I could score a new left hand I'd love to go back to my 6 full time. I do miss the extra range. I can get by on the 4 but can do so much more on a 5+....
LS
We are all entitled to our opinions but let me add a little more info:
I have been playing 40 years. I was there when back in the day was today. I have a son that is 23 and has been playing 10 years and he is into all the metal and heavy rock with a background listing to my old stuff of course.
As a father, I spend a lot of time talking with him about music, watching his DVD's with him, and talking "shop".
During those 10 years of being open minded and looking at what the youth of today is listening to, I still joke with him and call it "chainsaw music" because it does not have the melody that is "necessary" to create hits that last, and the example I use is Ozzy. Listen to his nursery rhyme melodies the same as he used 40 years ago and they still sell today.
But.....and there is always a but, Listen to Geezer Butler playing bass compared to any that replaced him in the 35 odd years since. No comparison in the fullness, melody, note "selection" run fills and, where they are applied, in fact his bass lines become part of the melody being heard, part of the song instead of under the mix as a drone in rhythm chord mode.
I find I practice more these days than I ever did (at least 1-2 hours per day) and at one point I didn't practice anymore. I again listen to the bass players, the notes being played, how well they fit and compliment the meody line, the separation, tone, amount of cut in the mix right down to the gear and amps being used, if live.
Bass players have the best gear available in history. The guitars are made with Quality Control where once there was no such thing. The amps are light years improved over what was available 40 years ago but the skill level has gone way down so that instead of the charts being full of nice tones and great bass playing, you now have to search for a great player. They just are not there because their influcences were not that good either.
Let me finish by explaining it this way.
Look at guitar players today. Mostly crap compared to past decades.
Most young players still have to go back to Page, Hendrix, Townshend, Iommy, and creep forward to perhaps Zakk, Randy or Dime and now it is time to remember that these guys are now 25 years ago, and grew up on the same Page, Hendrix etc.
What does that tell you?
+1 to Kwesi because I didn't think this thread would go 3 pages. Nice work and I dig your you tube stuff as well. Keep up the good work.
Muting a 6 was the toughest part for me too. Overall, I'm pretty comfortable with them but I don't feel like I make use of the higher notes enough yet to justify owning another one but I will some day soon. I prefer 17mm spacing to keep the neck width down. And I can still slap on it so it's all good, haha. Sixes are pretty big around my way especially in the churches. Those gospel guys are monsters on them too.
I get what you are saying. However, you cannot lump all 5 string bass players into the "pound the root" category. there are plenty of 4 string players who are not great musicians either.
Here's a 6 string player and there's no way he could do what he's doing on a 4 string: Adam Nitti
If those aren't well chosen notes "musical" notes, I don't know what is.
You don't, or at least I don't think so. I play what I want. I'm comfortable on 5s and everything I can do on a 4 I can also do with that one more string so playing a 4 doesn't make much sense for me. Eventually, I'll pick up another 6 along the way .
Oh..I agree with you. I personnaly have never seen many 5 or 6 stringer players I liked. Can't name a second one at the moment, but I do like Nathan East, who is both competent and tasteful and with pleasing tones on is 5 string.
The youngsters will adopt the 5 a lot better than older bass players. Once you gain a level of competence, it is abhorent to fluff a song you know, because of the foreign instrument.
I do like sound of the B string, but I can't use it for what I play and I am not prepared to put the time into learning another instrument when I can play as well as I can on a 4, and that does not include any note under bottom E.
5 strings has been standard outside the US for a good 15 years...
Someone posted this earlier and its true............at least in my experience..........go to Guitar Center and you'll see 25 4's and 2 5's hanging on the wall.
Not in my neck of the woods.
René_Julien;10828607 said:I think 4-string P-style and J-style basses will be made and sold long after all of us here (even or youngest fellow bassists) end our career. ...
Oh..I agree with you. I personnaly have never seen many 5 or 6 stringer players I liked. Can't name a second one at the moment, but I do like Nathan East, who is both competent and tasteful and with pleasing tones on is 5 string.
The youngsters will adopt the 5 a lot better than older bass players. Once you gain a level of competence, it is abhorent to fluff a song you know, because of the foreign instrument.
I do like sound of the B string, but I can't use it for what I play and I am not prepared to put the time into learning another instrument when I can play as well as I can on a 4, and that does not include any note under bottom E.
Rockville, Towson or Glenn Burnie usually have a vast majority of four strings. Chucks has a lot of 5 strings but I think that a lot of them have been on the wall since I started going there many years ago.
I think a number of four stringers (and I'm not referring specifically to you) are being overly defensive. Too many have interpreted the topic as "Are four stringers going extinct?", which is a gross misunderstanding. I don't believe anyone has said or implied that (it's unthinkable IMHO).
Kwesi had a good point when he said that he possibly should have named the thread "Fives on the rise?" Still, there's nothing wrong with the current thread title. Any stress here in the thread is from four-stringers who have misinterpreted.