Yeah I recall reading that, too. Personally I have a hard time buying into the idea that one fret difference, or 4 bolts vs 6 bolts, achieves a more "vintage" J tone (whatever that's supposed to mean). Call me skeptical but it sounds like pure marketing hype to me.
I think the real reason the JB emerged was to emulate the Fender Jazz Bass' iconic appearance, and ultimately replace the JB-2 which wasn't exactly breaking any sales records. OTOH, every maker that offers a Jazz Bass clone does so for a reason...Jazz Basses sell. Always, since forever. G&L finally figured this out, so now they make a Fender Jazz Bass themselves and can cash in on the ubiquitous classic design, same as the other cloners do.
A/B comparing a JB-2 with a JB for sound differences would be pointless because without a ginormous test sample there is no way to account for the standard deviation within each model. I can attest that JB-2's can sound a lot different from one to the next. I can't imagine why that inconsistency would be any different with the JB. What am I missing here?
Further, if G&L were mainly trying to replicate the classic Fender Jazz sound, why does the JB retain the famous G&L saddle lock bridge, which G&L has always proclaimed makes a definite tonal difference from the classic bent plate bridge? Muddy waters.