• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

G&L Club Part 7

so I talked to them about that and yes there are some different configurations you can go...I’m going to go outer for mine...I would imagine the inner might get closer to a Stingray-ish type of tone.

Not so much as you'd think, really. With the outer coils selectable as you're planning, you've got the single coils in the classic J-bass positions and with both selected a version of the J-bass scoop is there. With the inner coils selectable (like my L-2500), you don't get quite so scooped a jazz bass effect, but it's also not the punch-bite of a Stingray either—the coils are farther apart and, well, they're MFDs. I like the positions of the two inner coils when each is run in single coil mode. They're different positions than on my J-basses, but nonetheless quite distinct, bridge vs neck. In particular, the inner (bottom) coil of the neck pickup when used alone emulates the single coil mode on my L-1000 which I quite like.
 
Has anyone here attempted to mod an M-2000/2500 with an active/passive switch? Did it work?

Personally, I love the marriage of preamp and modified MFD pickups on the M series. Unlike my L's which I run battery-less, I wouldn't want to turn the pre off in an M. Wait...what was the question? Uh, no I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Remoman
Has anyone here attempted to mod an M-2000/2500 with an active/passive switch? Did it work?

Personally, I love the marriage of preamp and modified MFD pickups on the M series. Unlike my L's which I run battery-less, I wouldn't want to turn the pre off in an M. Wait...what was the question? Uh, no I guess.

Yeah in the case of the M, the pickups are a special wind to match the pre-amp. So purpose built to run the active setup. But I like the idea, and if one were to do it, it would really need to be a push-pull knob on the volume or blend knob to keep that M, knob only, look.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Temcat
Yeah in the case of the M, the pickups are a special wind to match the pre-amp. So purpose built to run the active setup. But I like the idea, and if one were to do it, it would really need to be a push-pull knob on the volume or blend knob to keep that M, knob only, look.

Yes I heard they are something like 20% underwound relative to the L series pickups, but given how powerful those are, I guess 80% is still plenty. I'm thinking about getting an US M-2500 sometime when I have the money, but I'm not really comfortable with purely active instruments, because I've seen preamps suddenly fail—in a bass and a uke, and no, it wasn't battery drain. So I'm just wondering if it's possible to implement passive fallback on the M-2500.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Remoman
@Temcat - Possible, yes. Glancing at the schematic, the volume and blend are passive only, so in theory could be bypassed. That said, looks like the order of things is pickups into blend, then into the preamp and the volume is at the end of the chain. So to bypass, you’d need to have the switch route the signal from the blend straight to the volume.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Remoman and Temcat
IMG_20191012_003904.jpg
 
Seriously Greg @RocketMusic please inquire

I think they're getting close with the Matador, I saw another prototype recently.

G&L generally likes to make their own splash about new product introductions, so I need to hold off on spreading any info for now. The info I have is all preliminary, anyway, subject to change by the time they actually launch the product.

I can't wait to get my hands on one of these!
 

Attachments

  • MATADOR-ON-BENCH.jpg
    MATADOR-ON-BENCH.jpg
    55.1 KB · Views: 52
  • MATADOR-ON-BENCH.jpg
    MATADOR-ON-BENCH.jpg
    49.2 KB · Views: 52
I think they're getting close with the Matador, I saw another prototype recently.

G&L generally likes to make their own splash about new product introductions, so I need to hold off on spreading any info for now. The info I have is all preliminary, anyway, subject to change by the time they actually launch the product.

I can't wait to get my hands on one of these!
I think they're getting close with the Matador, I saw another prototype recently.

G&L generally likes to make their own splash about new product introductions, so I need to hold off on spreading any info for now. The info I have is all preliminary, anyway, subject to change by the time they actually launch the product.

I can't wait to get my hands on one of these!
2019 G&L CUSTOM SHOP USA Matador Burgundy Mist w/ Hard Case
Looks like custom shop only for now...
 
I moved from the stock .022uF to a .033uF on my ‘93 a few years ago. With the stock cap, I felt that the bass sounded great with the treble rolled all the way off - and I played it this way often - but it didn’t allow you to go that extra range if you wanted it. I used a .033uF just because that’s what I had on hand; somehow I was short of anything larger at the time. I haven’t felt the need to change it since. It doesn’t get that super muffled tone that my other P with .047uF has, and it retains some clarity when rolled all the way off (barely), but I don’t really ever go to the extreme anymore.

Caps are cheap. Assuming you can solder, experiment and see where it gets you.
After listening to several demos of caps I decided to go with an agressive .1uF cap that had great reviews on Amazon. I carefully took before pictures so that I could reference them as I swapped out the cap.

Before:
IMG_20191013_075452190.jpg

Note the cap connections are the middle tab on the tone knob and the back of the tone knob.


The new Cap:

IMG_20191013_084307282.jpg


After:

IMG_20191013_084051296.jpg


Result:

Did not work. When using the tone knob there was no change in sound whatsoever. It sounded as if the tone was wide open. The caps came in a pack of 2. So I tried installing the second one orienting it with the writing facing the other way. I had no idea if that made a difference or not.

I checked LB100 wiring diagrams and Fender Precision bass diagrams and NONE of them looked like hat was in my bass. The biggest omission was only 1 wire (red) going to the output jack.

If anyone can help that would be great. If not, I'll probably just order another EMG Geezer kit.

Thanks!
 
After listening to several demos of caps I decided to go with an agressive .1uF cap that had great reviews on Amazon. I carefully took before pictures so that I could reference them as I swapped out the cap.

Before:
View attachment 3564261
Note the cap connections are the middle tab on the tone knob and the back of the tone knob.


The new Cap:

View attachment 3564262

After:

View attachment 3564264

Result:

Did not work. When using the tone knob there was no change in sound whatsoever. It sounded as if the tone was wide open. The caps came in a pack of 2. So I tried installing the second one orienting it with the writing facing the other way. I had no idea if that made a difference or not.

I checked LB100 wiring diagrams and Fender Precision bass diagrams and NONE of them looked like hat was in my bass. The biggest omission was only 1 wire (red) going to the output jack.

If anyone can help that would be great. If not, I'll probably just order another EMG Geezer kit.

Thanks!

I'll take a stab at it.

I think you have the cap going to the middle lug and to the back of the same pot which I believe is incorrect. It needs to go to one of the outside lugs of the pot. Refer to this.

Have a look at this wiring schematic for VVT

I just rewired my L2K for VVT using this diagram and it worked.

Hope this helps and Good Luck!
 

Latest posts