• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

G&L/Music Man

bovinehost said:
A friend of mine and I were talking about these basses and trying to figure out why both of us preferred EBMM basses, and all we could come up with, besides the clearly subjective issues of tone and playability and etc, was that the Stingray is just sexier.

You know, even as a die-hard G&L fan I can't argue with that - 3+1 headstock, oval pickguard, chrome control plate, big exposed pole humbucker . . . sweet!

Can't say I rate the rest of the MM family as highly as the original though (no this isn't a Bongo slam particularly, Jack - I'm more complaining about the Sterling and SR5 pickguards and lack of control plates -- I really like the Sabre look as well -- I haven't contemplated the Bongo long enough to form an opinion).
 
I have an L2K and a Sterling, and the two really complete my tonal palate. Both are top-notch construction and feel rock-solid for sure which I can't say the same for some Fenders I have had in the past. The G&L does have more sound variations (is there such a thing as bass ADD??), but the Sterling is no one-trick pony either (and that awesome neck makes the L2K neck feel like a tree trunk!)

I really feel that G&L's are unfortunately underrated.......

Love 'em both!! :D :D :D
 
You need to hang out with Chuck more, Jack.

He's got a good little collection of G&Ls going these days. Their current instruments are spectacular, they've made some great changes in the past few years.

Having said that, I'm definitely in the "modern EBs are awesome" camp. Looking forward to getting a Sterling HH4 sometime soon.
 
Brad, Chuck was the "friend" I was talking about, actually. I've talked to him more than once about his current crop of G&Ls.

And I'd love to sit down and have the complete tour of Chuck's current obsession...but remember, I've been through this with him before. And what was his latest purchase? Hmmm, lemme think..oh yeah, a natural SR5 that was once mine!

He's coming back around.

I haven't had a G&L in a long, long time, but would gladly pick one up and give it a whirl. I'm sure they're fine basses - but you know, they just don't have the sex appeal that Stingrays have (for me).

And hey, Craig? Sooner or later, bro, the Bongos will get you.

JW
 
lacatts said:
I have noticed that the Music Man basses sell (used) for a lot more than the G&L's. Why is this? Were they not both designed by Leo Fender? And did he not say the G&L was his favorite? Help me understand...

Leo wasn't a bass player. I am. I have owned several Precisions, Jazz basses, and Stingrays; an L-2000, a Climax bass, an SB-1, an ASAT bass (well, I borrowed one for 2 weeks), and a Sabre. I like the Sabre and Jazz the best, and the Rays next best. But I don't collect; I just play. :)
 
Although the SR5 is my favorite, G&Ls are really great basses. They are a steal used and Tributes are scarilly close to their USA made counterparts. I think that G&L has just never established as strong a personality as the Stingray.
The L-2000/2500 is neither fish nor fowl. It is clearly more modern than a Fender, but not as modern as the hippie sandwich basses that were catching on when it first came out. Other G&L basses look to much like Fender and Music Man retreads even though Leo Fender had every right to redesign his own wheel! I know that this is heresy, but to me the Sadowsky 24 fret model kind stole the l-2000's mojo and put it in a super high end package.