Here is a little more thumb wok. I love the tone!
Sweeeetttttt!!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Here is a little more thumb wok. I love the tone!
I mean...it takes maybe three or more minutes to do...not THAT big of a deal...
Fender thrives because they have the original sound and people like nostalgia. A little rout would make removing the neck unnecessary, but a lot of people literally want a bass just Geddy’s.
Yes!! As much as I prefer my Jazz V for certain styles of music , when doing that old school funk /r&b style a 4 really shines. It just feels right. And there is a certain sound that a 4 gets that a 5 just doesn’t have.The thing about the Geddy is that will really let me play some songs better than I can on a five. I was playing Glide by Pleasure, and when I thumped the open E, I realized that I was used to having to mute the B string which kept me from wailing on the open E at times. I had to tell myself there was nothing to mute. I sort of had to give myself permission to give that string a Larry Graham (Nathaniel Phillips) style whack! I have been playing a five since the late 1980’s but those first ten or so years on four left their mark, and for some things a four just feels like home for me. The Geddy is easily the best four I have had in nearly thirty years, and I am a much better player now than I was then.
I understand that. My point is, if Fendee truly were trying to make the best product they could, they would have fixed this issue long before Geddy’s bass was made. All the copies would, therefore, ne made with a better neck to body interface.
To be fair, the only basses that require neck removal for neck adjustment are the vintage reproductions. All of the other models have accessible trussrods. I have owned many Fenders and my Geddy is only whose neck I needed to remove.
I’ve never seen that before, but I guess Yeah I get that because that is definitely a legitimate concern..but it seems like you’d have to do that an awful lot for you to have to worry about wood degradatio, although I’ve definitely seen the ol “wooden dowels in the screwholes” trick ..of all the old Fenders (and Custom Shops with the same truss rod design) I’ve only had to make tweaks once or twice a year (my P bass neck doesn’t really budge)...maybe if I lived somewhere where the neck was a lot more temperamental it would be more of an issue but luckily I’ve never had to sweat neck removals...The issue is not the time. The issue is, every time you do that, the screw threads and other mechanical details of the neck/ body joint get degraded a little more. It’s a bad idea to mess with that interface more than you have to.
I’ve never seen that before, but I guess Yeah I get that because that is definitely a legitimate concern..but it seems like you’d have to do that an awful lot for you to have to worry about wood degradatio, although I’ve definitely seen the ol “wooden dowels in the screwholes” trick ..of all the old Fenders (and Custom Shops with the same truss rod design) I’ve only had to make tweaks once or twice a year (my P bass neck doesn’t really budge)...maybe if I lived somewhere where the neck was a lot more temperamental it would be more of an issue but luckily I’ve never had to sweat neck removals...
Here is a little more thumb wok. I love the tone!