Whatever the difference may be, take it from me. I've played three different Geddy's on three separate occasions and I can't, for the life of me, fathom why Geddy would allow his name to be put on the trainwreck.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I believe some of the newer ones are only painted.
The thing that bothered me the most about the GLee was that silly signiture on the head stock and the fact it was so heavy.
Is it so??? The Geddy's neck is the best I've ever tried.
And regrading the price. The Geddy do not cost that much if you consider how well it is build. It is just under the price of an MIA bass, so fine with me.
I recommend that one tries one out for themselves, and decide if they like them or not.
The question should be: whats the difference between a Geddy and the MIM Classic 70's Jazz bass.
Correct.
The answer, then, would be: the neck thickness, the difference in fretboard wood, and obviously MIJ/MIM. I really liked the features of the Geddy, but I couldn't get used to the neck thinness or the maple fretboard. It's so thin, you can basically see through it. The 70's Classic has a neck so chunky, it reminds me of an old P-Bass with a 1-1/2" nut...or a Louisville Slugger. Perfect for my bear mitts.
The build quality of the Classic is outrageous, too. I've played a few '08-newer MIAs, and they don't have anything on them.