had the 9.0 and a/b to the gallien krueger mb2 500, immediately sold genz benz and got the gk... im jus sayin...
Interesting, Ifor some resson I'm just not into GK.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
had the 9.0 and a/b to the gallien krueger mb2 500, immediately sold genz benz and got the gk... im jus sayin...
Interesting, Ifor some resson I'm just not into GK.
Gotcha, thanks for sharing the info.It's fine volume wise, just not as loud as I expected based on the stated specs of the amp. I'm far from alone in this sentiment, I'm just one of the few that's willing to say it in open forum. I've caught quite a bit of backlash for it as a result. For example, if you notice I have a hard time getting any support here now from GB or other supporters of the product. As a result I try to keep my comments focused on the positive aspects of the GB equipment so I can avoid that and continual comments like...It's funny hearing this from you considering some of our PM conversations, but yeah, I've been through all that ad nauseum. People who I've never met or heard me play implying I don't know how to play, don't now how to turn knobs, something is wrong with my equipment or ears, etc. That's fine. I've been around the Internet long enough to understand how the mob mentality works when it comes to people touting their favorite gear. Like I have mentioned plenty of times, I really enjoy the amp and the good GB customer (phone) service. The Shuttle 9.0 works well on the different gigs I use it on and sounds great for my recording needs. It's a very slick product and I'm glad I bought it. My suggestion to others, just make sure you don't say anything negative about it on TalkBass![]()
That MB500 voicing is way to the right of the Shuttle (in context to the RH450 being way to the left). The MB500 has a HUGE low end extension (they must have the hi pass set at 30hz or something... very deep bass) and the upper treble is cutting like a knife... a LOT going on above 8K... SUPER sizzly and modern. It's the only head I've played that makes my F1/F500 sound 'warm and dark'!
Way too over the top for me, and I've played two recent ones that hissed like snakes (partially due to that upper treble peak built into the voicing IMO). Loud as heck though, and they have a 'super goosed' tone.... super deep, super sizzly, with that classic GK aggressive grind in the upper mids.
Build quality is less than impressive IMO... not in the same league as Genz, Markbass, etc. (although to be fair, it is significantly less expensive than those other heads also.
It seems funny how clear your left and right discriptions are to me. Where would you put SWR?
All of the above... plus.
What I was referring to is; the relationship between those 2 controls has a plethora of tones in them altering the voicing. Subtle ratio changes made can take you from clean and bright to warm and smooth. I really haven't played an amp that had a front end exactly like this before. One more thing, get rid of your old notions about the use of the O/L light.![]()
Are you saying get comfortable with it O/L on?
When it flashes does it sound compressed, limited, fatter, less dynamics...?
No. I'm just saying that when the OL light is on you are pumping that tube is all. Unlike the Markbass amps where the clip light is not a good thing.
+1 That Genz clip light design is strange. It should basically be ignored. The MB input clip light (and most other input clip light designs) is just that... when it lights up, it means you are in the clip zone and should turn down the input gain (standard execution with a solid state preamp). The Genz clip light... not sure what it is. Strange concept to have a clip light associated with a tube pre anyway, since there is not hard 'danger zone' with a tube pre, which just gains complexity when pushed (versus the nasty gank and compression of a solid state pre being pushed). There is no 'optimum' setting (regarding signal to noise relative to distortion) with a tube pre.. that's the whole point of a tube pre... infinite gain possibility, with every level being 'appropriate' depending on tone goals.
Combine that input clip light on the Shuttle that really isn't a 'clip light' with the power amp clip light, that also doesn't indicate that any action should be taken (i.e., it isn't a power amp clip indicator, but an indicator that the 'tube emulation limiting is kicking in), and you have... well... customer confusion! Zillions of posts on this.
+1 totally ignore those lights on the Genz heads and use your ears.
If and when a Shuttle Max 9 comes out, I'm probably in.
Maybe GB should rename them "Let's get this party started!" indicators....![]()
(i.e., it isn't a power amp clip indicator, but an indicator that the 'tube emulation limiting is kicking in), and you have... well... customer confusion! Zillions of posts on this.
+1 totally ignore those lights on the Genz heads and use your ears.
I LOVE the input on our interfaces. The only issue is though, that two bassists never agree on what the "knobs" should be/do.
The two band mid control on the MAX series was from input received by people here. Of course, we received equal input that we have too many knobs.
Sometimes, the more options you have, the harder it gets.
When you have a lot of knobs, you feel obligated to turn them.
Sometimes, the more options you have, the harder it gets.
When you have a lot of knobs, you feel obligated to turn them.
This logic does not make sense to me, unless you're a spineles bass player who's easy for an inanimate object to slap around.
I have a ShuttleMAX12 and when I need the granular contol, I turn them. 90% of the time they are ignored. It's just a tool, not some evil Medusa trying to seduce my energy and attention.
IMHO and IME as one commenter says.