TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
View attachment 3129535 My office last night!
I played a few outdoor gigs last year using only a single BA12-3 and had tremendous sound. Haven't been outdoors since I added an SLT cab. Did you get any comments from your band mates or peeps listening to your playing? Personally because of the clarity I find myself much more fusier. If that makes sense. I've had a few times where I was wrestling with my sound only to have audience members approach me and rave about my tone.Speaking of outdoor gigs, I could not get a good tone outdoors yesterday. Any suggestions? I tried dialing up mids, A/B contours...nothing seemed to get the sound right. Any advice from you art and wine festival vets? I had no PA reinforcement...just 2 12-3s and the MG800.
Too boomy. Impedance was at 4/8 where it should be. Thanks!I have played a dozen or so outdoor gigs with the Mag and various cabs, including single, dual, or triple 12-3s. Never have a challenge getting a good tone. I just wonder if you had the impedance switch set correctly? Was it too boomy or trebly?
I had a Shuttle 3.0 for a number of years and positively loved it. I decided I wanted more power and went to a 9.0. I preferred the preamp of the 3.0 (can’t really tell you why at this point) but still was very happy with the 9.0. Then I upgraded my cab (an Acme B2) to the BA12-3 and was amazed at the difference. That positive experience inspired me a few months later to go to the Magellan 800 and sell my 9.0. The Magellan 800 is clearly reflective of the same general DNA but it feels more present and heftier in every register. It just seems to have more weight to the notes compared to the 9.0. The contour control is also really cool. I am thrilled with the Magellan 800 and feel that it was a clear upgrade over the 9.0. That upgrade is clearly worth the cash IMHO. Then about 6 or so months ago I decided to add the 350 combo. The 350 sounds and feels pretty much identical to the 800 at a lower power level. I sometimes think about downsizing and selling the 800 as the 350 does everything I want/need and sounds amazing and I don’t really need two heads. All of that doesn’t give a direct comparison between the 3.0 and the 350 since I preferred the 3.0 to the 9.0 but my gut says it is likely a real improvement from the 3.0 to the 350. You do also get the ability to run at 2.67 ohms with the 350 just in case you need to move a bit more air...Quick question. Jazz player here. I have been very happy using a Genz Benz Shuttle 3.0 but looking at the MG-350. Is it enough of a step up from the Shuttle series to be worth the cost? They seem eerily similar spec wise.
Was this a wooden outdoor stage? I have played a couple outdoor gigs with my MG800 and BA12-3 pair and did not experience this. I did try several basses as well but mostly My Cirrus and a NG2. Does sound strange that you couldn't cut the boomy. Although I DID play one strange auditorium gig wooden stage and the soundman had me unplug one speaker., but I didn't hear stage boominess - don't know what he heard out in the audience.Too boomy. Impedance was at 4/8 where it should be. Thanks!
I had a Shuttle 3.0 for a number of years and positively loved it. I decided I wanted more power and went to a 9.0. I preferred the preamp of the 3.0 (can’t really tell you why at this point) but still was very happy with the 9.0. Then I upgraded my cab (an Acme B2) to the BA12-3 and was amazed at the difference. That positive experience inspired me a few months later to go to the Magellan 800 and sell my 9.0. The Magellan 800 is clearly reflective of the same general DNA but it feels more present and heftier in every register. It just seems to have more weight to the notes compared to the 9.0. The contour control is also really cool. I am thrilled with the Magellan 800 and feel that it was a clear upgrade over the 9.0. That upgrade is clearly worth the cash IMHO. Then about 6 or so months ago I decided to add the 350 combo. The 350 sounds and feels pretty much identical to the 800 at a lower power level. I sometimes think about downsizing and selling the 800 as the 350 does everything I want/need and sounds amazing and I don’t really need two heads. All of that doesn’t give a direct comparison between the 3.0 and the 350 since I preferred the 3.0 to the 9.0 but my gut says it is likely a real improvement from the 3.0 to the 350. You do also get the ability to run at 2.67 ohms with the 350 just in case you need to move a bit more air...
Thanks revroy, much appreciated! I know that the Shuttle 3.0 is specifically designed with an FET Pre-amp which may add to the warmth factor of those little amps. I do know it really handles upright well in addition to it's duties with the electric. Anyone else wanna chime in on the MG-350 vs the Shuttle 3.0? TIA
On stage I felt the same... out front though, it sat better in the mix. Next gig with the two 12-3’s, I may introduce some HPF and see how that sounds.Too boomy. Impedance was at 4/8 where it should be. Thanks!
There's a nice write-up of Jeff Genzler in the current issue of BassPlayer magazine...check it out. Top-notch innovator and supplier of fine musical instrument amplification!
Bob
Thanks and DO IT!!!@S-Bigbottom, your Dingwall looks sweet!!! I've been looking at those, but I've never pulled the trigger.

Thanks and DO IT!!!
They are very smooth players and the fanned frets are comfortable to play.
Now I think straight frets are weird.![]()