• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Gibson Acquires Mesa/Boogie

I believe Gibson's intentions with Mesa are good.

FWIW it's common practice for large companies to acquire and kill of small disruptive brands, or kill of products that prove to be unprofitable (how much demand is there for headless basses, really?). Its just business.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
Ampeg exists now because of be acquired buy larger companies.

If they were not (and they have been passed around quite a bit) the last 30+ years of Ampeg would not exist, as well as the parts supplied that keep the old SVT's and V4B's going.
The ability to purchase new versions of these great amps with a warranty is also only possible because they are still around as well as great new amps and cabs.

Like them or not, Ampeg is one of the biggest bass amp companies around and they owe that to being bought out buy "Larger Companies".

Likewise, anyone with an Ampeg product that says, Magnavox, SLM, Loud, or Yamaha on the back has an acquisition to thank.
 
Ampeg exists now because of be acquired buy larger companies.

If they were not (and they have been passed around quite a bit) the last 30+ years of Ampeg would not exist, as well as the parts supplied that keep the old SVT's and V4B's going.
The ability to purchase new versions of these great amps with a warranty is also only possible because they are still around as well as great new amps and cabs.

Like them or not, Ampeg is one of the biggest bass amp companies around and they owe that to being bought out buy "Larger Companies".

Likewise, anyone with an Ampeg product that says, Magnavox, SLM, Loud, or Yamaha on the back has an acquisition to thank.
Yep, and while their road wasn’t always perfect, they’re in a really good place right now

Nothing wrong with hoping the new management at Gibson sees Yamaha buying Ampeg as an example
 
I guess I was reading this, because I love my Mesa Amps and cabs and was hoping to learn something but after reading 17 pages I think I’ll go back to living in the moment and hope for the best and not lose sleep over it. I wish the new owners the best and that they continue to make and repair Mesa Boogie as long as possible.
Peace,
DAcat
 
Ampeg exists now because of be acquired buy larger companies.

If they were not (and they have been passed around quite a bit) the last 30+ years of Ampeg would not exist, as well as the parts supplied that keep the old SVT's and V4B's going.
The ability to purchase new versions of these great amps with a warranty is also only possible because they are still around as well as great new amps and cabs.

Like them or not, Ampeg is one of the biggest bass amp companies around and they owe that to being bought out buy "Larger Companies".

Likewise, anyone with an Ampeg product that says, Magnavox, SLM, Loud, or Yamaha on the back has an acquisition to thank.
Cross posting: this post is helping me warm up to the sale of Mesa/Boogie to Gibson.
 
Anyone remember the Mark Agnesi "Play Authentic" dealio? ;)

Wow, I didn't know about that, thank you for bringing that to my attention. After doing some research on it, it seems Curleigh muzzled Agnesi (the debacle led them to take down their entire YouTube presence for a bit) and backed off on litigation to a large degree. So yeah, missteps, not angels, and so on, but apparently responsive to criticism. And I'm not sure that protecting trademark rights in and of itself is an act of greed.

That Agnesi guy seems quite a something...
 
Last edited:
(how much demand is there for headless basses, really?). Its just business.

Really?
Considering Status Graphite has always sold well and is still around. Kubicki existed until Phil died, and is now continuing. Carvin/Keisel has headless available. Ibanez offers headless in both std fret and fanned fret models. And now Yamaha is going to make a headless.
 
...I'm not sure that protecting trademark rights in and of itself is an act of greed.
They were going after designs they never trademarked, or didn't do so until the horses had long left the barn many decades before. And, long (decades is many cases) after those companies had been producing product with no one caring. Not until after Henry was out of there (the new guys smelling blood).
 
Last edited:

Latest posts