• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

GR AT Cube 800...damn, this looks like something special!

I think it was the Hubbell orbital telescope where NASA (or more likely a contractor) got tripped up by the metric to Imperial conversion. Oopsie!

I was once called on to rig some PA speakers in a church, and the manufacturer's published specs said they weighed over a 100 pounds each. When I got to the venue to do the work, I was able to lift the cabs easily and I'm not exactly Superman, so I knew that spec was wrong. Later, when I was able to examine the specs a little more closely, I saw the specified weight in pounds was 2.2 TIMES the spec'ed weight in kilos -- someone got something swapped around somewheres. Not a big deal in this instance, but you could sure see how some serious engineering mistakes could happen in a similar manner.

I remember being told when I was in grade school that we needed to master the metric system because we'd be changing over to it soon. That was about 60 years ago and I'm still waiting.
I’m still trying explain mass vs weight to my wife.
 
I remember being told when I was in grade school that we needed to master the metric system because we'd be changing over to it soon. That was about 60 years ago and I'm still waiting.
Since Imperial units are generally* defined by their relationship to standard Metric equivalents, Americans have effectively been using Metric for almost a century anyway. We've just been doing it in the most inefficient, awkward way possible.

*(Nautical units, surveying units, and some other measures might be exempt from this generalization, depending on which regulatory body you're dealing with.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexanderB
Huh, two pages discussing metric vs imperial.

FWIW, GR is based in my hometown in Italy. The owner is really passionate about his stuff, he is a bass player himself. The amps... they're not my cup of tea (clean, "linear", I prefer more colour) but they are undoubtedly very high quality. Apparently the DI is top notch (I haven't tried it), as is the EQ section. I don't care for the LED KITT car thingy, to me it's garish and a bit "cheap", but luckily you can turn it off or just use it as a tuner. I think they employ custom SICA speakers (I'm not sure about this), and the cabinets cost a bomb because they're in carbon fiber or whatever it's called. They are all made locally to specifications, so that also adds to the cost. They do sound very clear and they're very good pedal platforms as you have lots of control and articulation (the speakers are well designed), but at the same time if you're looking for warmer, woolier, more vintage-y sounds you might want to stick some sort of preamp in front of it. I think these combos (or head+cab systems, for that matter) are extremely good for the gigging musician due to the extremely low weight for the power (one might question the utility of putting so much power into one single speaker, but that applies to all combos anyway). There are lower powered versions anyway.
 
I really don't understand this metric / imperial system debate.

All websites provide both measures, including GR Bass, so what's the issue?

18300.jpeg
 
I am enjoying my custom GR Bass Aerotech 212 Slim combos. They are so light that weight is no longer a factor anymore and I just carry the bigger combo all the time and just turn down if necessary. I used to have a Markbass 1x12 combo with 1x12 extension speaker, which was a nicely modular rig. With the 212 combos I can hand carry everything in one trip as long as its not too far.
View attachment 5028264
View attachment 5028265

Is that something you can custom order from GR? I’d be interested in having one with their Pure Amp built-in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pingvuiini
$1850? Pricey!!

Maybe, but relative to a new top line $1,000 or so integrated head @ 800 watts, and $1,000 for 1-12 cab… and weighing in at about 17 lbs???

The only thing negative I see here is the strap location and cab size makes it a knee knocker. I’ve been spoiled by the side handles and their location on my Eden cabs…. @ 3 times the weight LOL!!!
 
I bought a AT410 cab this year and now they are teasing me with the 800 combo . I must be strong and not buy this beast that I didn't know I needed and now I want .........GR Bass , why do you haunt me in my dreams ?
 
That would be centimetres, not inches. It's European, they don't use inches.


Oh my bad.. centimeters is a little different LoL now I'm just like NASA confused by metric units and a Mars Rover... LoL

‘Me too. for a ball park conversion, try multiplying metric by .6 , For instance. 100 kilometers an hour = 60 mph.
How many bananas does it weigh?

Anybody have the “Stones” conversion?
 
  • Like
Reactions: WRM
Maybe, but relative to a new top line $1,000 or so integrated head @ 800 watts, and $1,000 for 1-12 cab… and weighing in at about 17 lbs???

The only thing negative I see here is the strap location and cab size makes it a knee knocker. I’ve been spoiled by the side handles and their location on my Eden cabs…. @ 3 times the weight LOL!!!
I haven't heard the amp in person yet, only on the video. Separates are, as a rule, pricier than combos. So, I'd restrict comparisons to other combos. That said, on paper I see the MarkBass MB58R MINI CMD121 PURE as direct competition and at $999, a greater value. But I haven't heard either in person.
I'd like to hear a side by side shootout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dbsfgyd1