It's disappointing that people have felt the need to drag Roger's integrity into the thread prompting his response to be one of defense and not one on the construction and design philosophy.
The disparaging remarks speak more about the poster.
A bass has to fit in your hands so comfortably that it inspires you to play it all the time. We all know that feeling.
A bass can and should express the sound you hear in your head. Sometimes, you have never heard it, but you just know that your setup isn't making the voice heard. Strings, pickups, speakers, heads, preamps all work to express that voice we want to hear.
The voice that delivers that is the one we grab, if we can afford it. But affordability should never be confused with hearing that voice. There is no relation between the two. Danelectro's still crank me up. I will break down and get one someday. It's a $300 piece of masonite.
Where a bass is made does not influence the voice of a bass. It's a meaningless argument as time has proven in spades.
I have a Sadowsky. To me, I know I can play through any rig, set flat, and find my voice. I say purely from a gigging perspective. I'm not a back seat bass player. I play in trio's and prefer that nasal mid with solid bottom sound. Every night. Every room. Every size crowd. And at every volume level. I am very happy and inspired. I can't gig enough with this bitch.
All of you have your bass of choice that inspires you as much as my bass inspires me. At least I hope you do. And if you don't, there's always Saturday morning at your local music shop where you will find your magic. It happens all the time.
I wouldn't want all bass players to own Sadowsky's. I mean it. If we all had Sadowsky's, Roger wouldn't work so hard to stay on top of his game. Why would he?