• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Headstock fivers: two by three or three by two?

I’ve owned most configurations, and while I haven’t gotten through all the replies just yet, I’ve read enough that I feel like a lucky one to rarely confuse which key goes with which string; maybe having to navigate many different configurations has helped keep my fingers on their … toes?

I vote for 2 on the bass side and 3 on the treble side because it pretty much eliminates any possibility of getting the non-tapered section of the string on the tuning post. If some one already said something like this on page 2 or 3 of the thread, they’re obviously incredibly intelligent and very likely extraordinarily good looking as well.

This begs for a poll.
 
I have 2 that are 3+2 and one 5-in-line. They're different enough that I don't get confused.

I have been known, however, to grab the wrong string when I go to or from a 4-string Musicman 3+1 to or from a 4-in-line Fender or G&L or a 2+2. I guess the moral of the story is: Pay Attention.
 
I absolutely prefer 2 (BE) X 3 (ADG) because it allows the B string to be farther up the headstock so there is less chance of the leader binding around the tuner post with any speaking length of the string. The G string doesn't matter, and the rest of the strings still have enough leader in any event.

2+3 so the B tuner can be further back
I can’t say I’m surprised you two beat me to it, but I can say I am pleased.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iiipopes
Apparently, Ibanez can't make up its mind, either.
They really can’t.
1F483936-32B4-4D49-BD26-9EB7BE84B907.jpeg


I really do wish the 32” scale acoustic had 2 on the bass side and 3 on the treble side for the reasons I’ve just mentioned.