• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Help me solve a band dispute about a recording!

I just don't agree with the need for lots of mics on the drums thing. A lot the drums on Led Zep IV were recorded with one mic up high, as are tons of Beatles, Stones, Reggae, QOTSA and lots of stoner rock, and the baddest of the bad jazz drummers like Elvin and Philly Joe. Any one of these style drum sounds would suit this track. One mic in front, pointed at the kick and snare, and the height of it will determine how much of the cymbals you get. Run it through a fat vintage style compressor and kaboom.

The QOTSA album session that used only one mic for a track was run by Joe Barresi; that man is the very definition of a guy who knows what he's doing.

That track, as well as the other artists you mentioned, were all cut using some of the best mics in the world, through some of the best consoles in the world, into some of the best outboard gear in the world, in some of the best sounding rooms in the world, with some of the best sound engineers in the world.

The OP is a hobbyist and is tracking live through an 8 channel mixing board designed for stage use, in what I'd assume is a room without proper acoustic treatment; using only one mic for the drums in that scenario is not ideal.

As I said before, it's not impossible to get a great sounding kit with limited mics, but you REALLY need to know what you're doing.
 
I'm no internet troll, but you need a new singer. A band or songs are only as good as the worst person involved, and your singer just really ain't got enough talent to be insisting anything to anyone. He has no dynamics and his tone .....well....yeah...
Also, if you must have live drums put dude on a LOUD click and let him record alone or record bass and drums and rhythm guitar live to make sure the timing is spot on. Playing not tight enough for a full band live recording of all instruments, but that stuff can be worked out with a couple dry runs...but the singer can't improve his voice after a couple runs...he's stuck with that. Good luck dude and keep plugging...its your tune and your gear.... Throw the hammer down and remember internet opinions are even worse than in person.... People online can create multiple identities to give you multiple opinions...in person they can only give you one.....
 
That track, as well as the other artists you mentioned, were all cut using some of the best mics in the world, through some of the best consoles in the world, into some of the best outboard gear in the world, in some of the best sounding rooms in the world, with some of the best sound engineers in the world....

Totally agree with you, just trying to tell the OP that's not all about tons of mics, or necessarily even great ones. First off it's about the drummer and the drums, 90% it at least, forget all the mics and boards and whatnot. A buddy of mine who is a truly great drummer, who plays with such a musical ear, with awesome well tuned drums, can get a great drum sound with one ribbon mic in just about any room that would fit this style. Steve Jordan recorded on an iPhone that's not clipping will sound killer. With newer engineers, putting 8 mics and a huge stereo spread on less than top shelf drums and drumming can create confusion, clutter, phasing, and all kinds of weirdness. They start to think there's some kind of magic mixing formula to fix an average drummer on crappy sounding drums. There ultimately is not. I think this approach is even more complicated than focusing all your attention and ears on 1 or 2 mics and experimenting with moving them around until you get something you like. If you don't like what you hear through one 57 or whatever, then why not? Are the cymbals tearing your head off and there's no solid backbeat? the go to the source, not the gear and the mix. No right answer, and you certainly can replace and tweak to make things much much better, but eliminating as many variables in the beginning is a great way to start and learn what to listen for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MDBass
Totally agree with you, just trying to tell the OP that's not all about tons of mics, or necessarily even great ones. First off it's about the drummer and the drums, 90% it at least, forget all the mics and boards and whatnot. A buddy of mine who is a truly great drummer, who plays with such a musical ear, with awesome well tuned drums, can get a great drum sound with one ribbon mic in just about any room that would fit this style. Steve Jordan recorded on an iPhone that's not clipping will sound killer. With newer engineers, putting 8 mics and a huge stereo spread on less than top shelf drums and drumming can create confusion, clutter, phasing, and all kinds of weirdness. They start to think there's some kind of magic mixing formula to fix an average drummer on crappy sounding drums. There ultimately is not. I think this approach is even more complicated than focusing all your attention and ears on 1 or 2 mics and experimenting with moving them around until you get something you like. If you don't like what you hear through one 57 or whatever, then why not? Are the cymbals tearing your head off and there's no solid backbeat? the go to the source, not the gear and the mix. No right answer, and you certainly can replace and tweak to make things much much better, but eliminating as many variables in the beginning is a great way to start and learn what to listen for.

Absolutely, undeniably true, and definitely a part of the reason I suggested that the OP retrack in the first place.

I would MUCH rather mix a single stereo track with the drummer crushing it than 10+ mic setup with a drummer who's playing isn't happening.
 
Hey Talkbass! I have something I want to run by you...

I'm now certain that I will never ask talkbass for production advice.
he posts a song made with new equipment and now he's got to... kick out his singer, replace his drummer with a computer, buy a bunch of microphones, and hire a producer :D
Music is supposed to be fun, especially at the beginning.
I would listen your band members before anyone here, your doing great and you're open to criticism which is an excellent trait.
Go make another song! Don't listen to us fools.
 
I'm now certain that I will never ask talkbass for production advice.
he posts a song made with new equipment and now he's got to... kick out his singer, replace his drummer with a computer, buy a bunch of microphones, and hire a producer :D
Music is supposed to be fun, especially at the beginning.
I would listen your band members before anyone here, your doing great and you're open to criticism which is an excellent trait.
Go make another song! Don't listen to us fools.

...what? No one has actually said "fire the singer" or "buy a bunch of microphones", and the rest of the responses are directly related to what the OP asked.

This is from the OP, "I was just wondering if I could get your opinions on this, as well as any other part of the song, (composition, playing, mixing)."
 
  • Like
Reactions: AltGrendel
I think I most love the fact that there are so many of us bassists who easily have some great thoughts, hilariously awesome, in the best way. Your drummer is taking a bit of a pounding (pun intended) if you did re-record, have him play to a click OR a loop.....in case he complains about too rigid, no feel, etc. That sloshy drum feel works, just a tighter, better take I would say is most important, the other stuff will fall into place and you could do a couple mixes for comparison. Of course, THAT will split the bands opinion of course ; ) Good that you're doing it PERIOD, and again, love the feedback from bass players....we are pretty much always right anyway.
 
I think all the players are cool ins some way, and there's a lot of good advice on here to bring the best out of it. Even some differing opinions to give him different perspectives on things to try. I think the song and riff and vibe is good, so OP has already triumphed. Even with some rough edges, I liked listening to it.

I should add that I recorded and mixed my first record about 13 years ago. My band kept it a secret for a year until it was all done, and I wish we hadn't. There were a ton of things we did that even an intermediate engineer (like I am now) could have pointed out to make it sound better. At least some of the songs were pretty good.
 
The big smiley face was placed to indicate humor.
My point was that communicating with the band is most important.
Practice, listen to each other, listen to the music that moves you and work on your songs, don't sweat the gear. Gear matters the least.
 
Ironically, my least favorite part of that recording is the vocals. Half of it sounds like he is pinching his nose while singing.

The piano is so subtle throughout the whole thing (at least through the 2nd verse which is as far as I listened) I find it hard to believe he would either pitch the song or not based on that alone anyway.

+1

No offense, but I would be looking for a new singer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Billybladez66
cut the tape in two.


"I am Solomon and I approve this message"


31118_000_032_01.jpg
 
The big smiley face was placed to indicate humor.
My point was that communicating with the band is most important.
Practice, listen to each other, listen to the music that moves you and work on your songs, don't sweat the gear. Gear matters the least.

Gotcha. I don't think anyone is suggesting that he needs more gear, and band communication is definitely important.

Telling the OP to ignore all the working knowledge and well intended advice he received regarding his questions about arrangement, mix and performance doesn't make any sense though.

Some very simple panning changes alone would immediately improve the overall mix, and now that he has his own home recording setup trying new and different techniques is the only way to improve his skills and the presentation of his songs.

Having the vocalist sing another take with actual monitoring and a pop screen on the mic would take all of five minutes and make a world of difference.
 
Hey Talkbass! I have something I want to run by you. Recently I got my hands on a mixing board and some recording equipment. It has 8 channels, and so I was really excited about being able to record my whole group in a live setting. We recorded one of our originals, but the piano was pretty muddy so we had to go over it again. Myself, the piano player, and the guitarist went back and we re-recorded the piano part. After I showed what I had mixed to the rest of the band, our singer was saying how he didn't like the piano during the first verse (where he is just playing on the 1). He said it was so opposed to that section that he was going to skip over it when demoing the song to people until we have a better tracking (which I thought was over the top). I was just wondering if I could get your opinions on this, as well as any other part of the song, (composition, playing, mixing). Here is the song, and you are welcome to listen to the other song of ours I have posted on my account, it is not fully finished yet but it is most of the way there.

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Okay, my twenty cents:

Good song. Performances are fine. Vocals are fine for the type of song it sounds like. For a rough mix, it's ok for a demo. For a finished recording, not so much, although you're not really far off, tbh. Did you multi-track this, or is this a live stereo mix? If it's multi-track, then you can always re-mix. Consider perhaps doing a instrument mix first, then a vocal take after if you're recording this live to stereo. Lots of inexpensive programs (REAPER, AUDACITY, ETC) out there to help you out.

Compression is your friend. Multi-band compression even better. Limiter even. If you got outboard units or built-into the mixing console, consider engaging them in the channels, especially for the vocals and drums. Even a little will go a long way. Use hard knee compression on the vocals, soft knee on the drums. Way too much room ambiance is washing out the sound, and the piano and drums sound too wide.

I think for the drums to cut through without overpowering, perhaps lose the gated short reverb, it'll give them more focus. If you're using a kick and overhead, either sum them together, or mix them slightly apart, placing the kick drum slightly back from the front to get a bit more of the kit. Tune the kick drum down a little for recording, it'll pick up a lot better. If you have 4-band EQ on your mixer, consider putting a roughly 3dB boost around the 1.8-3kHz mid-range for the kick drum. It'll help accentuate the transients. The other drum mic, pull it back behind the kit a little bit (consider using a large diaphram condenser, low cut off, aim it at the snare from behind the drummer instead of right over.

As for the piano, perhaps narrow its stereo field a bit, maybe even make it mono, then pan it either right in the centre, or on one side. Use a little bit of reverb with a pre-delay of about 150-180 ms (that will keep the reverb from washing out your sound) and if it has a hi-cut filter, put it at around 5kHz and the low-cut 400 Hz below. That will give more impact to your piano stabs. If this is a digital piano, consider using the upright patch instead of the grand. Or use a Wurlie electric piano patch instead. If you use the wurlie, consider rolling off the bottom below 120 Hz, so it doesn't compete with your bass.

Put the riffing guitar off to the opposite side from the piano. Have a small amount of room ambience for the guitar summed to mono in the centre, away from the guitar -- if you have a pre-delay setting, put it the same as the piano. It doesn't need to be noticeable throughout the mix, just at the beginning and during breaks. Panning it hard left or right won't matter, since the ambiance will give it enough presence in the rest of the stereo field.

Good bass sound, but perhaps shave a sliver of top-end off, and keep it dry, dry dry. I'd increase everything below 150 Hz on your bass, and mix it a wee little lower, so it doesn't compete with the other instruments. Either put it right in the centre, or pan it about half-way to one side, with the kick of the drums on the opposite side of the stereo field (don't pan it hard left or right, it'll sound too lopsided in headphones) This is so neither the kick or the bass are modulating each others' frequencies.

If you have a plug-in or an outboard multi-band limiter, don't be afraid to use it. Rule of thumb, threshold at about -4.5 - 6 dB, roughly 130 ms release. That should get you something that'll sound decent, and pretty sure the band will like the result better.
 
Last edited:
I think the bass/guitar/drums are the strong point in that piece. I don't think the piano is obtrusive, but I do think the keys could be made better use of rhythmically. Its sticking to that 1 a lot. Maybe even the And of 1 would help it bounce a little more like the rest of the instruments. It sounds like the keys are on the same chord through the first half of the song, and though it doesn't sound bad, it's not adding as much as it could. Maybe it's doing more than 1 chord, and I just can't hear the details. I like the song.
 
I'd try a take with a piano stab on the and of 1, then softer/more sustained phrases centered on the and of 2 & on 4. I'd compress it moderately and sit it down more in the mix. It's not bad where it is on 1, but it has enough space of its own right there to be conspicuous considering how high it's mixed. It's worth noting that it doesn't step on any vocals on 1, however.
 
Record a few versions of the tune. Make a bunch of really different mixes. Have all the band members listen to all of them on many different systems. Gather together a few days later and DISCUSS what everybody likes and dislikes. It won't cost you anything but time and everyone just might learn something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MDBass and Lo-E