• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Highly Modified Does Not Equate To Higher Prices

As someone who does tech work locally, my experience is that tasteful mods don't automatically reduce the value of a used instrument, and a savvy buyer will pay a little extra if (and that's a big IFF) the changes align with mods they would have done themselves.

However, IME the only way you'll usually get a reasonably good return on the parts cost, and especially your labour, is if you can get the completed project into someone else's hands, and they fall for it.

I've done a few modded Squiers and less mainstream stuff (like an Ibanez ATK, etc.) that came together particularly well, and was able to turn a profit because someone else borrowed them for a gig or a recording session, and then didn't want to give them back.

Otherwise, you're better off returning the instrument to stock, and either installing the upgrade parts on someone else's bass when they request them, or selling them separately.
 
Depends on the bass and the cost of the upgrades. Cheapo tuners to Hipshot? I'm charging more. Cheapo pickups to EMG/Nordstrand/Sadowsky/Seymour Duncan, etc.? I'm charging more. Cheapo preamp to Aguilar/Sadowsky/John East? Yeah...........I'm charging more. Or else I'm removing everything and putting the stock crap back in it.

No way you're getting these upgrades for free!

I would even go a bit further ...

I think the tuners on any cheap instrument are a necessity. That to me is a given and does increase the value of the instrument.

Using your Squier example: Fender seems to have an allergy to anything but the cheapest plastic nuts. Crime in Asia! Even Epiphone wen to bone nuts as standard equipment (as well as Grover tuners, to the best of my knowledge).

I might mention the garbage bridges which are often found on lower-end instruments.

I will say that Pick-ups are always going to be subjective, bowing to personal taste.

As someone else mentioned, I would always caution: keep the original parts because there will always be someone who wants the instrument for "collector value".
 
  • Like
Reactions: sonojono
I am probably in the minority, but if I am buying a bass to modify to suit my own needs, I don't really care about the resale value. I see this so much on TB as a main point of focus and I can't help but ask why? Why do so many people buy gear if they know they are going to sell it down the road? And let's be honest, unless you buy stuff new and sell it very soon after, buying a used instrument and selling it a year or 2 down the road, modification or not is a pretty small investment assuming you get somewhat close to what you bought it for.
I agree. I mod my instruments with no regard to resale. Would I mod a '57 P-bass? Nope, but a 2015 MIM P is fair game, IMO.

But I see the point of the OP. I think it does increase the value as long as the buyer is requesting it. Buying a P and slapping Hipshot bridge/tuners on it does not raise the price by the cost of the upgrades just automatically. Cheers!
 
I guess it depends if you are an investor or a musician. The purpose of an instrument is as a means to making music. Upgrades or modifications that make it better for making music must therefore add to the intrinsic value.

I find the notion that an instrument which has been improved to better achieve its purpose is somehow devalued by being no longer as god intended (or as it fell off the production line) wholly unintelligible.

YMMV.
If you're an investor, you're not likely to be looking at cheap basses to begin with, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteveCS and Texican
this thread baffles me. if you junk some cheap ceramic garbage for a multi-hundred dollar pickup, if you replace a bridge that can't intonate with one that's a solid chunk of metal, if you put on expensive tuners that actually hold a tuning... yeah, it should sell for more.

Maybe because that's an extreme example. Also, few would buy such a junky bass even after being modified, lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sonojono
Why “mods” or “upgrades” don’t really change the price too much, is because they don’t change the fundamentals of the instrument… they’re just parts… parts that one individual prefers, parts that can be replaced/changed again and again. Just like clothes don’t change the fundamental characteristics of a human. Then there’s the question of installation quality and hidden potential issues… a buyer asks ‘why did the person mod the bass to begin with?’… ‘why did they take the time to mod it and then end up selling it even after the “upgrades” were installed?’ ‘Does the bass still suck even after the mods?’ “Lower end” instruments can be perfectly fine, but often tend to have questionable qc issues over the long run and add to that questionable mods… so a buyer who is a player (musician) is more concerned about long term reliability then the small changes in tone form a pickup or wiring… and therefore won’t pay extra for the same level of qc…. while a collector/trader will want to flip it for a profit, but if they’ve already paid “top dollar” for the mods there’s no room left for a profit. So in either case, there will be a price limit on the instrument, no matter how good the mods are… even if it is an amazing playing/sounding bass. George Costanza is still George Costanza even if he’s wearing an Armani suit and a Rolex watch.
 
Last edited:
Some mods are always better. John East preamp is always better than a Carvin preamp, so they're in all my Carvins. Delano pickups are always better than Carvin pickups too, so, they get swapped. Putting in a single star ground and adding shielding to the pickup cavities helps reduce noise, so I do it. Where it gets subjective is putting in switches for every series/parallel combination possible. All the combinations sound good to me. But I don't expect anyone to pay for that part, should I ever sell my basses (after all that and how good they sound, why?) If someone had already done all that and I trusted their work, I'd pay a little more.
 
I put emg geezers into a ss squier jaguar that I think I bought new for $250. Sold it used a couple of years later for $650.

damn.jpg
 
If the cheapo passive bass has solid neck, flawless factory fret job, acceptable weight, no wrap neck or ski jump thing happened. Sure i will happy to spend on part upgrade on it.

My current cheapo Bacchus BJB1RSM is good example, she has equal build quality to Yamaha TRBX504, Fender Am Performers J . So i swap the stock ceramic single coil J pup to Cort VTB-ST humcancelling J pup. For cosmetic look , i add thumb rest, Wilkinson brass saddle bridge, Fender Knobs, Chrome neck pickups cover. And a set of EB Cobalt 2814 which i found a great combination with VTB-ST pup in bass tone i liking. It is worth for spend on upgrade/change/modified part.
 
I kind of feel like there is a generally accepted value range of a given instrument within the community. Whatever level of instrument it may be.
The question of mods increasing value is subjective to the original value of the instrument.
I literally put a set of $200 Aguilars in a Yamaha BB404 that I bought for $100. I would never get the value out of that. BC that bass goes for between $100-250. So plus or minus relative to that.
But if I buy a dirty old higher level bass cheap and put time and effort into cleaning and polishing it I can double its value.
The perceived value of the instrument dictates the increase or decrease of actual value.
Disclaimer: I wrote this last night very late. Just in case it doesn't make sense
 
  • Like
Reactions: steve_rolfeca
I would even go a bit further ...

I think the tuners on any cheap instrument are a necessity. That to me is a given and does increase the value of the instrument.

Using your Squier example: Fender seems to have an allergy to anything but the cheapest plastic nuts. Crime in Asia! Even Epiphone wen to bone nuts as standard equipment (as well as Grover tuners, to the best of my knowledge).

I might mention the garbage bridges which are often found on lower-end instruments.

I will say that Pick-ups are always going to be subjective, bowing to personal taste.

As someone else mentioned, I would always caution: keep the original parts because there will always be someone who wants the instrument for "collector value".
I don't think folks would argue that those mods are a bad idea. Clearly they add functionality. They might even increase the value of the instrument (to a potential buyer) slightly.

The point of the thread though is that you are unlikely to find a buyer who will pay you a premium (above the price of an unmodified used example) equal to the full value of the parts you installed.
 
Unless the mods are exactly the mods I would do, they devalue the instrument for me
That makes perfect sense if you don’t do your own technical work.

Otherwise, you’re missing a good opportunity.

I was looking for a Squier mahogany CV thinline Telecaster body for a partscaster build a while ago. I found a complete CV thinline on Craigslist that came with a set of popular upgrade pickups, a low-profile bridge and better saddles, a 4-way switch and a fancy pearloid pickguard, plus all the original parts. It was priced below the typical asking price for a stock one in good condition, because the seller needed a quick cash sale.

I sold the stock neck, which was too skinny for me anyway, plus the stock and upgrade pickups, both pickguards, both sets of saddles, etc. for a tidy profit.

That helped to offset the cost of the custom aftermarket neck I already had, the Lawrence pickups and the piezo saddle kit I had on order, and saved me from having to buy the 4-way switch and ashtray that I would have purchased anyway.

As an unexpected bonus, it had a set of vintage-style tuners that I wouldn’t have normally ordered for one of my own builds, and I found I really liked.

The end result was a unique instrument in a configuration that Fender doesn’t offer, that looks, sounds and plays exactly the way I wanted, for a cash outlay of less than $600.

It’s not going anywhere, but I’ve already been offered a lot more than I paid for it anyway.
 
the stock model is the standard by which used price will be measured against.

a bass can be objectively "better" due to an upgrade. but it's not "the bass" from the factory that we can easily look up the new price, as well as the sold listings on ebay.

that alone makes the bass a unique item that inherently has a smaller demand.

MIM P - everyone wants one. people search for em. people pay for em.

MIM with swapped lollar, dimarzio, nordstrand, fralin, or whatever else you dig.... not as many people want that specific thing. even though, depending on which pickup you mod, it's fairly easy to agree that it's "better" than stock. but there's still a smaller number of people looking for exactly that.

it's a weird supply/demand issue in some way. it's also to view "modded" as "tarnished" and in some cases that's true.

You also have to question how well the mod was done. That’s difficult when buying used online, so it’s best to assume it was done poorly in case it needs to be “fixed.” This, again, diminishes the value.
 
  • Like
Reactions: groooooove