• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Hobbyists -vs- Real Musicians?

I agree with all of this except the back seat thing. Unless they start putting steering wheels in the back seat then yeah I guess I'd agree then.

Backseat meaning the audience doesn't really notice the bassist and, as far as songwriting goes, the baseline doesn't count for copyrights (for the most part). Everybody knows the lead singers name, few know the bassist or drummer or keyboard.
 
I’ve never been paid a dollar to play bass so feel a little weird making this comparison, but here goes: Eons ago a buddy and I got into beer making and kinda got thinking about the levels of home-made-ed-ness. I mean, you can get a kit, (think box cake). You can get different ingredients; picking your own hops, malt or malt extract, etc. (think home made cake). Whilst washing up bottles in preparation for a batch we were making, we got thinking about home extreme you could get with the concept of “home made”. Did you grow your own wheat and hops out int the back yard? That sort of thing...
We kind of agreed that if you didn’t buy the beer at the store and some phase of the operation took place in your kitchen, that was home made. I think that concept applies here. - Hope my little analogy was entertaining. If not will try to do better next time...
 
I’ve never been paid a dollar to play bass so feel a little weird making this comparison, but here goes: Eons ago a buddy and I got into beer making and kinda got thinking about the levels of home-made-ed-ness. I mean, you can get a kit, (think box cake). You can get different ingredients; picking your own hops, malt or malt extract, etc. (think home made cake). Whilst washing up bottles in preparation for a batch we were making, we got thinking about home extreme you could get with the concept of “home made”. Did you grow your own wheat and hops out int the back yard? That sort of thing...
We kind of agreed that if you didn’t buy the beer at the store and some phase of the operation took place in your kitchen, that was home made. I think that concept applies here. - Hope my little analogy was entertaining. If not will try to do better next time...
Fresh hops are one of the best things I've ever done for my beermaking. Having said that, even the larger microbreweries around here (New Holland, Founders, Bell's) use mass-produced, pre-packaged malts...though, I suppose the apt analogy for that would be national touring musicians that use Boss or MXR pedals, specifically for their ubiquity. Kit beers, IMO, are analogous to Squier or Epiphone beginner kits; prepackaged ingredients are the next step up, as in the busker or the Friday night act that plays at New Holland, Founders, and Bell's; and being the brewmaster at those facilities would be analogous to a Rob Trujillo, Les Claypool, or Flea.
 
Backseat meaning the audience doesn't really notice the bassist and, as far as songwriting goes, the baseline doesn't count for copyrights (for the most part). Everybody knows the lead singers name, few know the bassist or drummer or keyboard.
Oh yeah I guess that depends on genre. Most "pop" music today, nobody knows anyone in the band at all except for the singer who probably doesn't know anyone in the band either. The kind of music I like, everyone knows everyone in the band. It's fanatical. What I was referring to though is musically. If you're doing things right as the bass player, you are absolutely in the driver's seat.
 
A frequent side topic on many threads covers "real musicians" - you have to gig five nights a week to consider yourself a real musician. And then the - if you don't play originals, you're just playing someone else's music, might as well be a juke box -vs- play covers - it's what the crowd wants to hear. Then the classic - if you have expensive basses, you're a bedroom hack, it's all in the fingers.

Why do we care so much about what everyone else is doing? We're all bassists and just the fact that we chose bass means that we're largely taking a backseat to the rest of the band. Copyrights are determined by lyrics, chord progressions and melodies. Screw the bass line. If we really wanted to be successful musicians, we'd work on vocal skills and play an acoustic fronting a band. So, maybe it's pent up frustration about nobody really caring about what the bass does until we screw up - then people notice.

If you just enjoy playing at home - that's great! You're still playing bass! If you play originals - awesome! If you're into covers or a tribute - rock it strong! Play a Squier - kudos! Play a MTD - great! Only a very few are actually going to make a living at this. Getting home at 2:30AM for $75-100 gets old quickly for some.

If you are playing bass and find enjoyment in what you do, you're doing it right.

But if we didn't talk trash about every other bass player on the internet, what would we do with our free time?! Something CONSTRUCTIVE? Like PRACTICE? No way!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikewalker
I believe a lot of people are still hung up on some initial, maybe childhood, concept of “making it big”—-whatever that meant to them—and they are still trying to conform definitions of words like “musician” and “professional” and “success” in ways that make them feel good about themselves, while of course discouraging others.

This is so true.

There's always the aside made while dismissing the importance of the pro/semi/hobby definition that the person was pro for many years and now has more important things to do...

There is so much ego recognition wrapped up in the arts that statements rarely are made without qualification. I even do it in my own head - "I would be playing out much more but for the small kids, fairness to the wife, full time non musical job, house upkeep, other interests, etc. etc..". I am flat out busy most of the time and yet still feel the pull to justify why I am not a "professional" musician, even though I am in three groups plus solo projects, all with semi regular live work!!!

Fricken crazy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikewalker
Those who tour the world are working musicians. Those who play bars are working musicians. Those who study the instrument in depth and become amazingly proficiant with it are pro's. So in reality, you can be a pro and never leave your basement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Helix
A frequent side topic on many threads covers "real musicians" - you have to gig five nights a week to consider yourself a real musician. And then the - if you don't play originals, you're just playing someone else's music, might as well be a juke box -vs- play covers - it's what the crowd wants to hear. Then the classic - if you have expensive basses, you're a bedroom hack, it's all in the fingers.

Why do we care so much about what everyone else is doing?
I don't see it thread to thread or band to band, but musician to musician in bands I found over time that "hacking" became a common occurrence when one member would extend themself to write a tune played *this* way, but if you offered an idea that was out of their knowledge, interest, or skill and it was simply laughed off/ slept on it..... well to me that sounds like "hacking".

Maybe my idea of a hack is different from yours.

There's tons of "hacks" in bands that I guess if I were applying descriptions I'd say they are members of bands that act passively when it's in the best interest of a group to contribute to a direction. I guess in a way I've been a hack as well because I simply didn't tell people what they wanted to hear, so I'd get criticized and shut up!

As far as playing covers.... It's a fine line of adding variety, yet picking tunes that keep people's interest. .. make a band of 5-11 members who all have different tastes and you potentially have a disaster. That's why I like writing music, honestly. A chance to get out from the shadows of greater established people.

Anyhow, I'm a know - nothing expensive bass buying reclusive reject hack that hasn't done much important despite trying to go with the flow for years. Tried the "taking charge" stance too ... I'm local public enemy #1 because I know what I seek. Hoping to turn it around some day. LOL
 
I have a specific definition for a musician...it is one who who will play what they are told/hired to play. Their abilities include the ability to read music, whatever format or a remarkable ear and mind skills that make them somewhat savant in this area. Then, there is the artist. The artist can be a musician, but not all musicians are artists. There are a lot of folks who would like to tell you a specific definition for an artist...but, that is kind of like telling you what the color purple tastes like. No “grape” jokes needed here. Those same folks , to me confuse the real definition of artist vs. employee.

Having been a professional musician for a long time, I don’t get paid as often these days. However, I’m still a musican. My wife worked with me as a full-time musician but she has never had the heart and soul of a musician. She is an artist who writes songs and plays well enough to perform them. She has an artist’s vision and sensibilities and doesn’t jam. I just love to play and making music is a joy. If I’m playing with the right people and the music is good, I don’t need to be paid. Van Gogh didn’t sell pictures but he was an artist. Many excellent musicians don’t get paid to play. We’re not defined by the money.
 
For me it has nothing to do with money, profession, or the kind of tunes you play (covers or originals). "Musician" is a title you earn through your musical competence. I have played loads of gigs, most of them for money, and have performed both covers and originals. But I don't believe that I have fully earned the title "musician." To earn it, I feel I would need above all to have a fairly complete mastery of my instrument, to the point that I instinctively know where all the notes are and can play them all at will, as and when needed. It would help too if I had a stronger command of the musical language and theory used in the particular musical forms I play, such that I could more readily compose and improvise lines within those forms, if required. And I would feel even more confident of my claims to being a "musician" if I could sight read music better than I can currently can. I realise of course that this is a pretty demanding definition of "musician," one that would deny the title to many pop and rock players who are are conventionally called "professional musicians." But I am ok with that, not least because it would also mean assigning the title to the many many "amateurs" out there who do possess the requisite competence.
You have also ruled out many classical musicians. Many of them cannot improvise and are lost without dots. If you make music with proficiency, you are a musician.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fdeck
In my view, "professional" is not about pay, but how you treat people. What do people expect when they hire you, or work with you in a band? What if they had to hire you in a pinch, based solely on reputation or qualifications? What would you hope your reputation would say about you? Most of what I learned about professionalism, I learned in middle school band.

Not that it's always mandatory. I've done some pretty obnoxious things as a musician, because music can also be an art form, a protest medium, social activity, etc.

My band is a roughly equal mixture of full-time pro's, school music teachers, retired pro's and teachers, and amateurs like me. We treat one another as equals, while at the same time respecting the people who are committed to the career. The pro's in my locale tend to be appreciative of good amateur performances. There are some areas where amateurs can serve the music in ways that the pro's can't, for instance keeping obscure, historic, and experimental music alive despite a lack of commercial appeal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: retslock
We're all bassists and just the fact that we chose bass means that we're largely taking a backseat to the rest of the band.
True, if you mean in terms of visual prominence, fame, spotlight time, and recognition by the general masses who don't understand what is going on on stage and the value of the bass's contribution to what they are hearing.

Why do we care so much about what everyone else is doing? ...
Because people in this community are generous and want to help other members of this community.
Perhaps I'm wearing rose-colored glasses, but my theory is that the reason some TB members try (sometimes forcefully) to share their opinions with others in the interest of having others adopt their way of doing things is that they truly believe they have discovered something that is very beneficial to themselves, and they extrapolate that if would be similarly beneficial to others. They altruistically want to help others in this community, so they'll try very hard to convince others to do it their way. They have nothing whatsoever to gain by this, other than being able to feel good about having helped other people. Lo and behold, most humans, as a general rule, like to help other people, and feel good about themselves when they do so. Some people have a higher need for explicit thanks and praise and recognition for their efforts than others.

If you are playing bass and find enjoyment in what you do, you're doing it right.
Amen to that! Having fun should be the main reason not just for playing bass, but for doing most of the optional things in life that we choose to do. The only rule is that your fun should not ruin somebody else's fun. As long as you don't do that, just do what's fun! Every day!
After all, you only have a VERY short time on this earth. If you aren't having fun, you are wasting the precious few days that you have been gifted. And once they are gone, you can never get them back.
If your fun can also improve someone else's happiness, or even better yet, make the world a better place, that is even more powerful and awesome! But even if you can't achieve that lofty goal every day, at least have fun!
 
A frequent side topic on many threads covers "real musicians" - you have to gig five nights a week to consider yourself a real musician. And then the - if you don't play originals, you're just playing someone else's music, might as well be a juke box -vs- play covers - it's what the crowd wants to hear. Then the classic - if you have expensive basses, you're a bedroom hack, it's all in the fingers.

Why do we care so much about what everyone else is doing? We're all bassists and just the fact that we chose bass means that we're largely taking a backseat to the rest of the band. Copyrights are determined by lyrics, chord progressions and melodies. Screw the bass line. If we really wanted to be successful musicians, we'd work on vocal skills and play an acoustic fronting a band. So, maybe it's pent up frustration about nobody really caring about what the bass does until we screw up - then people notice.

If you just enjoy playing at home - that's great! You're still playing bass! If you play originals - awesome! If you're into covers or a tribute - rock it strong! Play a Squier - kudos! Play a MTD - great! Only a very few are actually going to make a living at this. Getting home at 2:30AM for $75-100 gets old quickly for some.

If you are playing bass and find enjoyment in what you do, you're doing it right.
I can care less about all that stuff.
A frequent side topic on many threads covers "real musicians" - you have to gig five nights a week to consider yourself a real musician. And then the - if you don't play originals, you're just playing someone else's music, might as well be a juke box -vs- play covers - it's what the crowd wants to hear. Then the classic - if you have expensive basses, you're a bedroom hack, it's all in the fingers.

Why do we care so much about what everyone else is doing? We're all bassists and just the fact that we chose bass means that we're largely taking a backseat to the rest of the band. Copyrights are determined by lyrics, chord progressions and melodies. Screw the bass line. If we really wanted to be successful musicians, we'd work on vocal skills and play an acoustic fronting a band. So, maybe it's pent up frustration about nobody really caring about what the bass does until we screw up - then people notice.

If you just enjoy playing at home - that's great! You're still playing bass! If you play originals - awesome! If you're into covers or a tribute - rock it strong! Play a Squier - kudos! Play a MTD - great! Only a very few are actually going to make a living at this. Getting home at 2:30AM for $75-100 gets old quickly for some.

If you are playing bass and find enjoyment in what you do, you're doing it right.
ive been all over the place with all these things. It’s not really stuff I waste time on.

I’ve owned cheap $200 basses up to basses that cost almost $6k if I had paid full price. My main player these days cost $1800. Ive owned a half a dozen basses that cost more than that and sold them all. Do I think the rediculously expensive basses like Foderas and Ritters are nice? Absolutely. Would I buy them, I could put them on a credit card but choose not to.

I’ve played plenty of originals gigs and some cover gigs so I’ve seen both sides of that and enjoy both for different reasons.

Is it about money? I live a more comfortable lifestyle working at the hospital four 11 hour shifts a week and married to a wonderful woman who happens to have a masters degree than the majority of “profession musicians” do being on the road away from their kids most of the year. I don’t like playing for free unless it’s a show I’d pay to go to if I wasn’t playing. But that’s more about not coming out of pocket so I can afford family vacations and stuff With my wife and daughters.

So who cares?

As for singing I suck at it but I’m trying to get better. Guitar player absolutely refuses to sing backup and our singer keeps pushing me to sing more. Might invest in some decent in ears to see if that'll help.
 
My take......if you play and get paid (and pay taxes on it), you're a professional musician. You can be full-time or part-time. Some earn a living from it. Some make a good supplemental income from it. Some make a marginal income from it. Hobby is playing for fun for no pay. Hobby is investing in something and not getting a return from it.
 
I played music for a living in my 20s. After realizing in my late 20s that I wanted to do things like, buy a house, have a wife and family, have a reliable car, etc. I made the decision to go to law school and now I'm an attorney who also plays the bass on weekends. Best of both worlds IMO. I will add, whenever people ask me what I do, I say both, and people seem to be much more interested and impressed with the musician part. :)
 

Latest posts