In some ways this strangely reminds me of the last time I considered buying a new car.
I went in (knowing what the dealership had paid) and made an offer.
The dealer made some comment about not being able to "feed his family" if he sold the car at that price.
My response? That is your problem.
I don't care what the luthier spent on materials. I don't care how much time the luthier spent building it. I don't care if the luthier makes money or loses money on the sale.
I care about maximizing MY economic benefit and getting the instrument I want for the least cost possible. If a luthier is stupid enough to put himself out of business selling things cheaply to me - good deal for me, stupid decision for him.
I don't have some sort of moral imperative to make sure the luthier is making a living wage or to protect him from his competition or his own decisions.
You said it. My competition. Which is El Cheapo. Even though theoretically it would appear it isn't, it is.
No you have no obligation to anyone but yourself. True enough. However you also reinforce my point. The mass market does drive even the niche.
Here is how. You said if I can't differentiate sufficiently the value of the Tom Richards Amazing Custom Bassanova, my bass vs. el cheapo then essentially it's my problem. The thing you miss is that for the most part most of us actually have. However the mindset is exactly like yours. You want yours, all of it, at YOUR price. If I am charging a fair price, but you don't like it, the quick response is that something less expensive is as good. And your barometer is the lowest common denominator. I don't know any TBer who ever started a thread titled, "compared to custom builder 1 custom builder 2 is a good deal." But there are tons comparing price point basses to top of the line customs.
Then you go on the Internet and tell everyone how much I suck and then start threads like "Mr. Cheapo bass IS AS GOOD AS A Tom Richards Bassanova?" I could care less if you buy something different, but I have to care if you do something that tarnishes my ability to make that living. So I have two responses. Either work my price lower to meet your desire, or lose a sale. Lose enough sales, and of course I am looking for a 9-5. Lower my price and I eat but still take the bus.
Which is exactly the point of the OP. It wasn't about if Tom Richards is a good businessman, it's what should a good builder make per hour. And the rest of us chimed in to point out that what is made per hour is not what we charge per hour nor what is charged per hour doesn't come close to even some of the suggested rates.
McDonalds sells a double cheeseburger for a buck. A local pub makes a double cheese that is light years better. Because his beef costs more then McDonalds, he had to raise his price from $4 to $5. $5 is still a great price for a local pub burger. Within a month his price was back to $4. Not because his costs went back to lower, but because he has to compete with the mass market even though he is NOT a fast food chain. Its not his niche at all. I actually listened to two customers tell them that they could buy 5 burgers at McDonalds for that price, and that $4 was okay, but $5 was just too much.
Why do you think Mercedes came out with the Smart Car and dropped the Maibach? The Maibach was absolutely worth it's price. But the mass market effects the high end market.
Same for bass. Everyone keeps one eye on the cheapo and when you don't like even a fair price, you will pull it out and clobber us with it. So it DOES effect even the Ritters, Brubakers, Backlunds, Spectors and all of the US custom builders.
I am not saying that you should pay for me to live a great lifestyle. What I am saying is that if you really look at what you get from a custom builder, it really is a good value, if not inexpensive.
Next time I reboot my company I will hire you to write my plan and get me my lines of credit. You do at least understand the financials.