Wow, there's a lot of circular arguing going on here!
Let me restate the two main points from my post a few pages back, and try to get this thread back on the subject:
1.) I should charge $100/hour. By any rational calculation of my business costs, that's what it would take to cover my overhead and non-billable hours, and leave me taking home a modest income. And most of you would agree that's a reasonable rate, comparing my skills, experience, and shop equipment to other skilled trades.
But:
2.) I can't charge $100/hour. Basses are bought on a fixed price, which is determined by the market. That is, the customers will decide to buy or not buy based on what they think is the value of my bass. And if I take that market valuation price that customers are willing to pay for my bass, and work the numbers backwards, it comes out to $45/hour. That's what customers are actually willing to pay me.
The conflict between those two things is the problem. That's why I build my basses and take home hardly any real pay for my labor.
The four main ways to resolve this are:
1.) Find some way to significantly reduce my overhead, such as a shop with no rent.
2.) Dramatically improve my efficiency by increasing my Billable Hours and reducing wasted time.
3.) Dramatically reduce the labor hours needed to build my basses, without reducing the quality or features.
4.) Significantly increase the selling prices of my basses, and find some way to convince my customers that they are worth it, so that they are willing to pay that much.
You can see how those things are conflicting, particularly 3.) and 4.). It would take major changes of any or all of them to bridge that gap between $45/hr and $100/hr.