• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

How pathetic is this???

And I agree with your statement... we live in an incredibly diverse culture, and you would think that diversity would drive evolution. But sometimes you gotta decide to evolve, ya know?

Absolutely!
Someday, we're all going to be a slight shade of tan and speak some sort of universal Chinese/English/Spanish hybrid language and will have then to rely on height or something to hate for :)
 
Free speech does not apply here and neither does peaceful protest. The school officials felt they were starting trouble, and in a high school setting that is far from peaceful protest. And again bandannas aren't appropriate for school in any area.



Free speech most definitely does apply here and this type of situation has been very well defined by our judicial system. The school officials who disciplined the kids are just plain in the wrong, from a legal standpoint.

See: Supreme Court case Tinker v. DesMoines.

From Cornell University:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0393_0503_ZS.html

From Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinker_v._Des_Moines_Independent_Community_School_District
 
Wasn't there an incident a couple of years ago where some Mex-American students took down an American flag and replaced it with a Mexican flag at their school then wouldn't let anyone take it down for a while? Forgot where this was..

It's entirely possible. Not saying racism doesn't go on, but in my opinion this isn't racism. Just a cry for attention.
In any case I didn't hear about it.
 
According to the school officials who disciplined the kids, the kids wearing the images of U.S. flags were intending to cause a disruption by doing so and wanted to disrespect the kids wearing Mexican flag images.

Let's suppose this is actually true. The only way this could happen is if the kids wearing Mexican flag images have a legitimate claim to be offended by images of U.S. flags. And this seems to imply that there is something inherently anti-Mexican about supporting the ideals that form the foundation of the United States.

I think many people actually do believe exactly that, and that's the reason for their being offended. They're thinking "How dare someone highlight the United States on the one day of the year that I get to highlight the country of my heritage."

I think it's unfortunate that we have gotten to this point. :(
 
Free speech most definitely does apply here and this type of situation has been very well defined by our judicial system. The school officials who disciplined the kids are just plain in the wrong, from a legal standpoint.

See: Supreme Court case Tinker v. DesMoines.

From Cornell University:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0393_0503_ZS.html

From Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinker_v._Des_Moines_Independent_Community_School_District

The problem with that argument is that the kids did it to insight trouble. The clothing worn probably violated the school dress code on other levels as well. Not to mention that it was far from peaceful. The kids were confrontational and chose to go home and be viewed as martyrs rather than come to any peaceful agreement. From a school officials perspective, if other students complain or if they see fights and other troubles brewing, then they needed to take actions needed to nip it in the bud.
 
That's ridiculous on 2 levels. On the kids levels, IF they did that as a shot at Hispanics, or IF they did it in response to the holiday or immigration bill, it then becomes inappropriate. I can completely see how it could cause an issue, especially if they live in an area with a high population of immigrants. And bandannas aren't proper school garb anywhere. They have been deemed "gang" clothing and like hats have been banned from all schools in my area.

On the school administrator/board level, they now have to worry about being sued/voted out/ etc. by people like Carroll. The conservatives (not stereotyping it was the example used in the OP) feel like it is an attack on their rights to get under any other cultures skin. Its insensitivity and intolerance to other cultures that causes a lot of the divisions in the country today.

IMO the kids shouldn't have done what they did. It probably isn't send home worthy; however, the kids picked that punishment themselves. They didn't have to be martyrs, they chose to. Now they have a romantic cause, one that Conservatives and Tea Party activists can jump on and read things into.

So what your saying is on the 4th of July anybody wearing a shirt with any others colors or flags should be sent home.
 
The problem with that argument is that the kids did it to insight trouble. The clothing worn probably violated the school dress code on other levels as well. Not to mention that it was far from peaceful. The kids were confrontational and chose to go home and be viewed as martyrs rather than come to any peaceful agreement. From a school officials perspective, if other students complain or if they see fights and other troubles brewing, then they needed to take actions needed to nip it in the bud.

Hogwash....
If the kids who were "offended" rose above this, then all of the power, attention and martyrism of this whole thing would have amounted to a whole lot of nothing. They are equally at fault and this is a mere symptom of a bigger issue that the school should be working on.
The "patriotic" kids did it to incite trouble no doubt, but it's the kind of trouble that needs two sides.
The school could have handled this a lot differently.
 
Eh, yes and no. Freedom of speech would be protected here, as would their right to peaceful protest. Personally I think the school messed up big time. And for the record, not conservative and even I`m livid about this.

Ummm.. schools have been given extremely wide latitude for limiting free speech if that speech causes disruption.

Schools ain't the public square.
 
The problem with that argument is that the kids did it to insight trouble. The clothing worn probably violated the school dress code on other levels as well. Not to mention that it was far from peaceful. The kids were confrontational and chose to go home and be viewed as martyrs rather than come to any peaceful agreement. From a school officials perspective, if other students complain or if they see fights and other troubles brewing, then they needed to take actions needed to nip it in the bud.

Were you at the school that day? How can you be so sure of these facts? Based on the blog posted in the OP and the articles I've read about this topic on various news sites, it would be impossible to be able to draw those conclusions solely based on the facts as we know them right now.

Do you have an additional source, is my information not up date (entirely possible, I'll admit), or are you jumping to conclusions to support the side of the argument you want to be right?
 
Sounds like a few kids wanted the day off from school. They were probably sitting at home drinking warm Corona's and watching this story "unfold" on the news.

The same way the "Sickle and Hammer" t-shirt, or anarchy T would make most Americans angry on the Fourth.

Meh,...where whatever you want,...there more to life than just being offended by everything.

or the cute, trendy Che Guevara t shirts...

Yeah, trendy in like 1998.

Hogwash....
If the kids who were "offended" rose above this, then all of the power, attention and martyrism of this whole thing would have amounted to a whole lot of nothing. They are equally at fault and this is a mere symptom of a bigger issue that the school should be working on.
The "patriotic" kids did it to incite trouble no doubt, but it's the kind of trouble that needs two sides.
The school could have handled this a lot differently.

I think they should have allowed the "patriots" to were their shirts and if a fight ensued; out come the tasers. I'd play goal tender and kick any stray kids back into play.

This incident will go down as a foot note in history. Let me know when something truly important happens.
 
Sounds like a few kids wanted the day off from school. They were probably sitting at home drinking warm Corona's and watching this story "unfold" on the news.



Meh,...wear whatever you want,...there more to life than just being offended by everything.



Yeah, trendy in like 1998.



I think they should have allowed the "patriots" to wear their shirts and if a fight ensued; out come the tasers. I'd play goal tender and kick any stray kids back into play.

This incident will go down as a foot note in history. Let me know when something truly important happens.

Sorry, that just bugged the hell out of me.

Frankly I'm of the opinion that if you're in this country, expect to see this country's flag at any time and at any place and deal with it.
 
Don't let it bother you, you will never change their minds. Opinions are like a-holes, and more than half of them are full of poop.

I think the bugging is due to a typo.

Sorry, that just bugged the hell out of me.

Frankly I'm of the opinion that if you're in this country, expect to see this country's flag at any time and at any place and deal with it.

I just re-read my post,....:atoz:

I guess it's too late for a ninja edit. :hmm:

You don't see anyone storming the post office because they are flying old glory on the 5th of May.

I want to +1 all the importance placing on what is really just an an excuse to get drunk on watered down beer and tekillya.
 
Don't let it bother you, you will never change their minds. Opinions are like a-holes, and more than half of them are full of poop.

lol no not that.

The whole

Where = location.
Were = past tense of to be in the 3rd person.
Wear = to be robed.

and

There = location
They're = contraction of 3rd person present of to be
Their = possessive

thing just drives me nuts.
 
I think the bugging is due to a typo.



I just re-read my post,....:atoz:

I guess it's too late for a ninja edit. :hmm:

You don't see anyone storming the post office because they are flying old glory on the 5th of May.

I want to +1 all the importance placing on what is really just an an excuse to get drunk on watered down beer and tekillya.

:p

I wasn't saying meaning to imply that you were making the argument against it. I was just voicing my opinion of the situation and didn't want to double post so I kept your quote above it.
 
What about a John Wilkes Booth or Oswalt shirt on President's day?

529.jpg





Someday, we're all going to be a slight shade of tan and speak some sort of universal Chinese/English/Spanish hybrid language and will have then to rely on height or something to hate for :)



84794196_1ffc979d41.jpg



They took our jerbs!!!


Uh,I mean........subscribed.
 
lol no not that.

The whole

Where = location.
Were = past tense of to be in the 3rd person.
Wear = to be robed.

and

There = location
They're = contraction of 3rd person present of to be
Their = possessive

thing just drives me nuts.

Damn I did it twice? I'm usually pretty good about proofreading my posts,....:(

:p

I wasn't saying meaning to imply that you were making the argument against it. I was just voicing my opinion of the situation and didn't want to double post so I kept your quote above it.

And I was pretty much agreeing with you. You are in America and here we fly the American Flag. It's on houses,...Federal Buildings,...Schools. I haven't heard of any buildings being burnt to the ground because they had the American Flag on them on Cinco de Mayo.

I'm curious,...in other countries do they have holidays that celebrate the heritage of their immigrants? Or do those immigrants celebrate their heritage by living it and being proud of it everyday. I guess I'm wondering why we pick just on day out of the year to celebrate this sorts of things.