• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

I love fender but ...

I also don’t understand the decision to embrace narrow tall frets, because they are “easier to bend”? I hate ‘em and know I’m not the only one. In truth, this sounds like an economic manufacturing decision to use the same fret wire on all guitars and basses of the same line.

I’m talking primarily about the Am Pro ii line, and for some odd and deal-breaker reason, the Am Vintage ii. I realize they offer medium jumbo on other lines, but the two I mentioned are the best quality passive options that aren’t special editions or artist models.
 
I also don’t understand the decision to embrace narrow tall frets, because they are “easier to bend”? I hate ‘em and know I’m not the only one. In truth, this sounds like an economic manufacturing decision to use the same fret wire on all guitars and basses of the same line.

I’m talking primarily about the Am Pro ii line, and for some odd and deal-breaker reason, the Am Vintage ii. I realize they offer medium jumbo on other lines, but the two I mentioned are the best quality passive options that aren’t special editions or artist models.
Aren't those what Lakland uses?

Isn't Lakland supposedly a superior instrument?
 
Would it kill them to give people what they want? It's like they refuse to give matching headstocks. Like why make a green bass with a black headstock? It's like they do it on purpose. even Harley Benton offers matching headstocks.

View attachment 5388131

In this case one could say beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I would never own something like that in a million years, but I know what an accent wall is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: andare
"I'll paint any headstock, any color, for $29.95"

anyone-ever-use-earl-scheib-to-get-their-car-painted-v0-58h41ac2b5va1.jpg
It's spelled "door jamb?" With a "b?" Forty years on this Earth and still learning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Swerve
We can always complain about tort which to me is the most sinful of all the things you can do To Put On A Bass and see how that goes. Believe me it was siege mode when I posted something like that a few months ago before it was pulled. :roflmao:
gawd forbid we have opinions regarding aesthetics!! lol
 
Would it kill them to give people what they want? It's like they refuse to give matching headstocks. Like why make a green bass with a black headstock? It's like they do it on purpose. even Harley Benton offers matching headstocks.

View attachment 5388131
That one in particular has a black headstock because it's essentially a reissue of the Jazz Bass Special, which had a black headstock.

Otherwise I agree. I love matching headstocks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: r_bnks
Would it kill them to give people what they want? It's like they refuse to give matching headstocks. Like why make a green bass with a black headstock? It's like they do it on purpose. even Harley Benton offers matching headstocks.

View attachment 5388131
Fender totally missed the boat on those. They would be selling like crazy if they had the black painted necks like the originals
 
Here's what I want from Fender:

A passive P-bass with a retainer for the A-string, a pickup that actually sounds like a classic P-bass, a standard Fender-style bridge, a "modern" nut width, a classic C-shaped neck and a 9.5" radius fretboard. Basically a bog standard P-bass with the addition of a string retainer for the A-string. No silly "innovations" like those nasty fluted tuners or the V-Mod pickups with different magnets in the two coils.

Unfortunately they don't currently offer this, and haven't since the American Standard series.

It this really too much to ask for, from the company that actually invented the P-bass? Just a standard, passive, workhorse P-bass that actually sounds and feels like a P-bass, but with a fix for the ONE thing Leo didn't get right: The poor break angle over the nut on the A-string.

They HAVE tried ways to fix this problem of course but why can't they just use a retainer like the ones Sandberg and Yamaha and many other manufactures have been using for DECADES? They actually work. I hate the fluted tuners on the Fender AmPros, I've broken several D- and G-strings at the tuner shaft during setup because of these horrible tuners. And they aren't even needed for the D/G-strings, as these strings already have a string retainer! The stealth retainer on the Ultras are ok, if a bit fiddly, but they come with the premium cost of an Ultra bass, which to me doesn't sound or feel like a classic P-bass. The Ultras are good instruments but not what I want. The pickup is seriously weak in passive mode.

Anyway, these things are far more important to me than a matching headstock, which although it looks very cool isn't really "classic Fender" IMO. It would be nice of they offered it on SOME models though
Fortunately for you, Fender Stealth string retainers are available and require zero permanent modifications! Rejoice!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hoochie Coochie Man
To be fair, the unpainted headstock is part of their brand. They bring out painted headstocks from time to time (like the MIM sparkly 75th anniversary P & J models), some Jazz bass reissues, or the Aerodynes, but unpainted is a big part of “the Fender look”. So maybe a Fender isn’t for you, and you can like them from a distance. Some of those alt choices are pretty amazing and still pretty Fenderish, eg Lakland.

Fwiw, I’m a huge Fender fan, I’ve owned many and currently own no less than 6, but the best bass I’ve personally owned or even played is my Stingray Special, which also doesn’t have a painted headstock.

I’m not sure I see the point of complaining about things Fender doesn’t do, there are so many choices, and I’m sure with an 80% or more market share worldwide, they’re not too concerned about a fairly small handful of complaints. That’s how markets have always worked.