• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Identify the SX vs. Fender in the mix thread

Sorry for not sharing the enthusiasm, but am I the only one who thinks this kind of comparisons are irrelevant? Maybe I am being naive and amateur here, but isn't the actual bassline that counts?

:hiding: <- naive, unprofessional bassist hiding away.

On the other hand, does the recording device make justice to the tone differences between the two basses?

:eyebrow:

Yes, they are irrelevant.

I contend that ANY bass can be made to sound good, live or in the studio. Do we have our preferences? Of course we do&#8230;

Super cats like Victor Wooten are in the world where, yes, you will get the sound you want to your exact specifications, pretty much all the time. The rest of us have to muddle along. Your live sound is great to you sometimes, awful at others, but to 99% of the audience it&#8217;s irrelevant.

No, savit, we can&#8217;t really compare anything beyond tone on an internet forum. Except looks, and that is absolutely subjective. So is playability, though perhaps less so (more of us are likely to agree on what is or isn&#8217;t a bad set up).

So, yes, I take you on your word that the SX plays well and is your preferred instrument. Can I take it on that word that any SX will be the same for me? Of course not&#8230;

OK, maybe I&#8217;m just taking this way too seriously&#8230; everyone just play what you love&#8230;
 
No problem with your comments here, just wondering why you wouldn't gig them? If they sound good, is it weight, looks, feel, because you endorse a different brand, or something else?

Because of my personal relationship with Kevin Brubaker, I had to put a name on it. "Endorser" is close enough. I can play anything I want and I do. But I'm not going to take my 1960's Aria 4 string on a gig. Or my hollowbody 50's Kay or my Kawai or Kramer DMZ4000 or Electra MPC Outlaw or any of my older Fenders. They're all cool in their own way but I mainly play sixes and often play fives so those other basses (all fours) don't do me much good.

Weight isn't an issue for me and I don't really let looks bother me either if it's something I like to play.
 
The thread is for both. I listen to and watch people other than myself. Example: If I listen to Savit's bands, I will do so as a audience member, not a member of his band. I still care about how the bass sounds. If I go see Wooten, I am going to be upset if his bass sounds like crap. True, there is a difference between listening and having to find the sound you want, but Savit seems to have accomplished finding his sound, is able to duplicate it in a much cheaper bass and seems pretty happy with the situation.

Fine, I'll take your word for it that you think this thread is for audience members and players. As an audience member, your interest in an SX vs. Fender shootout would be...?

The audience doesn't care AND it does care?
:D

No, I agree the bassist should care about it, but we all have different taste...so while a quilted top from the dagobah system may be the ultimate look for you, it may completely turn me off. Many bands try to entertain beyond just music, and in those bands people do notice what if you are playing fits the bands image.

I said "... most audiences I've seen aren't particularly concerned with the looks of an instrument". I stand by that observation. It's way down the list of priorities.

For them...that's the key. I care very much about the playability of my basses, and am very picky about my setups...that doesn't mean you would like how they played, or that I would like how yours played. It also doesn't mean either would be bad players just because we had a personal dislike for each others setup. Do you think Jaco would have found Jamerson's bass playable, or vise-versa? IMO, I doubt it.

I really don't understand what kind of a circle you seem to be talking in as far as playability. You said you don't care about playability for the players you mentioned. I said they care and you countered with this. Huh?

This question for instance is curious...
"As far as playability goes, Savit said it plays as good as, if not better than. the Fender. But would it matter to anyone but him if it didn't?"

Absolutely... it would very likely matter to anyone else who is playing one. It would matter to me. Do you actually think it wouldn't matter to anyone?


It should be very important to a performing musician...that's what sound checks are for. If you don't perform, well, you're right...what you sound like is between you and your neighbors.;) I do agree that if we are happy with our gear that should translate into a better performance.

In the context of what you quoted, I can't make sense of this either.

Sound checks are for what?

What the audience can or cannot discern isn't a big concern for me because I know that if I get it right to my satisfaction that's the best I can do. You seem to agree that personal satisfaction should yeild a better performance than having to deal with problems.

Do you specifically disagree with something I've written? I can't tell.
 
Because of my personal relationship with Kevin Brubaker, I had to put a name on it. "Endorser" is close enough. I can play anything I want and I do. But I'm not going to take my 1960's Aria 4 string on a gig. Or my hollowbody 50's Kay or my Kawai or Kramer DMZ4000 or Electra MPC Outlaw or any of my older Fenders. They're all cool in their own way but I mainly play sixes and often play fives so those other basses (all fours) don't do me much good.

Weight isn't an issue for me and I don't really let looks bother me either if it's something I like to play.

That makes perfect sense to me....NOT being sarcastic (sometimes it's hard to tell just by reading post).

Thanks for clearing that up for me. I get what you were saying now.
 
Fine, I'll take your word for it that you think this thread is for audience members and players. As an audience member, your interest in an SX vs. Fender shootout would be...?.....

Damn, you got me....:D


I said "... most audiences I've seen aren't particularly concerned with the looks of an instrument". I stand by that observation. It's way down the list of priorities.

If the audience never heard of you before, sure. But if you have an image, that's what they expect to see. If I paid money to see Wooten, and he played an SX instead of a Fodera, I'd feel a little cheated. You could say you have no image, well then That's your image. If you always played in jeans and a T shirt in a jazz group and suddenly showed up in platform boots, makeup and playing a Cort Axe...people would think something is wrong, even if you managed to get the tone the same as your usual bass ;)


I really don't understand what kind of a circle you seem to be talking in as far as playability. You said you don't care about playability for the players you mentioned. I said they care and you countered with this. Huh?

This question for instance is curious...
"As far as playability goes, Savit said it plays as good as, if not better than. the Fender. But would it matter to anyone but him if it didn't?"

Absolutely... it would very likely matter to anyone else who is playing one. It would matter to me. Do you actually think it wouldn't matter to anyone?

I said I care very much about playability personally, but what is a perfectly set-up bass for me may not be what you like. I like really low action, someone with a heavy attack may very well get string buzz and say it plays awful....in turn, I could pickup their bass and think the action is wayy too high...playability, within certain realms is subjective. Of course there are basses that are unplayable by most anyones standards, but I don't think that's what we are talking about.

Why does it matter to you if Savit finds the SX as good as, if not better player than his Fender? He said they are setup the same, his hand finds the SX very comfortable. Where is the problem there? Some people hate P necks, some hate J necks....doesn't matter, they make both for that reason. Unless you are wanting to buy either one, I don't get that or why you think it should matter to everyone, that he likes the feel as good as the Fender.

Different people like different setups for different kinds of music, hence my question, Do you think Jaco would find Jamerson's bass playable or vise-versa? Both were obviously playable by their owners, but if they swapped, don't you think some major adjustments would have been getting made?



In the context of what you quoted, I can't make sense of this either.

Sound checks are for what?

What the audience can or cannot discern isn't a big concern for me because I know that if I get it right to my satisfaction that's the best I can do. You seem to agree that personal satisfaction should yeild a better performance than having to deal with problems.

Sound checks are to get the best band sound for the show for the people that hopefully paid to see you. Be sure they go away happy and want to see you again, IMO. I do respect your attitude on this, and wonder if you may be doing the same thing but with a different focus. We may be splitting hairs here. You do sound checks be be sure things are the best you can make them before your performance...that benefits the audience, right? So they will come see you again, right?

Do you specifically disagree with something I've written? I can't tell.

I don't know anymore. :D

You seem to have a problem with this kind of thread, but at the same time you post alot in it....that's strange to me.

FWIW, I like Fender alot. I like SX too, and they are a great value for the money. If you like modding, you're gonna love SX, because they are perfect for it. But having bought a few, I am not under any delusion that you can buy a $100 SX and open the box and pull out a vintage Fender. Hell, you've done good if you buy a good Fender from Fender, IMO. Needless to say there are great Fenders out there, but more than likely an SX is going to need some attention to get up to speed. How much attention depends on your luck and goals, I guess. Like I said before I've replaced everything except the body on mine. Every wire, every screw, everything. I don't recommend them to beginners unless they have know-how to get it right, or access to someone who does. But it can, and frequently has, been done.
And yes, I may buy another one(but I hate, hate, hate that Ursa headstock)...but I know that the worse case senerio is that I wind up with a painted body for $100 as the only usable part...that's still a good deal. The best case senerio is tweak the truss, put on fresh strings and play. Better deal. But not likely.
 
Damn, you got me....:D

:D

If the audience never heard of you before, sure. But if you have an image, that's what they expect to see. If I paid money to see Wooten, and he played an SX instead of a Fodera, I'd feel a little cheated. You could say you have no image, well then That's your image. If you always played in jeans and a T shirt in a jazz group and suddenly showed up in platform boots, makeup and playing a Cort Axe...people would think something is wrong, even if you managed to get the tone the same as your usual bass ;)

Ever seen Regi Wooten play?
:D

I would bet dollars to donuts that if Vic showed up on a gig with an SX and did what he does, people would still go nuts... some moreso than before because many think that what he plays is the secret behind his mAD SKilZ.

I said I care very much about playability personally, but what is a perfectly set-up bass for me may not be what you like. I like really low action, someone with a heavy attack may very well get string buzz and say it plays awful....in turn, I could pickup their bass and think the action is wayy too high...playability, within certain realms is subjective. Of course there are basses that are unplayable by most anyones standards, but I don't think that's what we are talking about.

No, we're not talking about individual preferences, we're talking about the inability to test it out in a shootout like this.

Why does it matter to you if Savit finds the SX as good as, if not better player than his Fender? He said they are setup the same, his hand finds the SX very comfortable. Where is the problem there? Some people hate P necks, some hate J necks....doesn't matter, they make both for that reason. Unless you are wanting to buy either one, I don't get that or why you think it should matter to everyone, that he likes the feel as good as the Fender.

By that logic, why should any of his findings matter to anyone else?
:D

I didn't say there was a problem with what he likes so I'm not sure why you're asking.

Different people like different setups for different kinds of music, hence my question, Do you think Jaco would find Jamerson's bass playable or vise-versa? Both were obviously playable by their owners, but if they swapped, don't you think some major adjustments would have been getting made?

I think Jaco knew how to tweak a bass so he'd understand that Jamerson's setup wasn't permanent;)

You're taking this setup/playability thing way beyond the simple premise that..

A) You can't experience it in this shootout and
B) For many folks, it matters. It's important.

:cool:

Sound checks are to get the best band sound for the show for the people that hopefully paid to see you. Be sure they go away happy and want to see you again, IMO. I do respect your attitude on this, and wonder if you may be doing the same thing but with a different focus. We may be splitting hairs here. You do sound checks be be sure things are the best you can make them before your performance...that benefits the audience, right? So they will come see you again, right?

I lean towards getting your act together before you hit the stage. The rest usually takes care of itself IME. I probably do as many gigs with as without soundchecks... they're nice but ultimately not that important if you're working with competent people (which I tend to do). If they're incompetent they can still screw things up after the soundcheck.

I know how to get the sound out of my gear that I want. I leave the house to whomever's controlling it. I know not to have my stage setup interfere with that.

I don't know anymore. :D

You seem to have a problem with this kind of thread, but at the same time you post alot in it....that's strange to me.

I have an opinion... just like you.
;)

FWIW, I like Fender alot. I like SX too, and they are a great value for the money. If you like modding, you're gonna love SX, because they are perfect for it. But having bought a few, I am not under any delusion that you can buy a $100 SX and open the box and pull out a vintage Fender. Hell, you've done good if you buy a good Fender from Fender, IMO. Needless to say there are great Fenders out there, but more than likely an SX is going to need some attention to get up to speed. How much attention depends on your luck and goals, I guess. Like I said before I've replaced everything except the body on mine. Every wire, every screw, everything. I don't recommend them to beginners unless they have know-how to get it right, or access to someone who does. But it can, and frequently has, been done.
And yes, I may buy another one(but I hate, hate, hate that Ursa headstock)...but I know that the worse case senerio is that I wind up with a painted body for $100 as the only usable part...that's still a good deal. The best case senerio is tweak the truss, put on fresh strings and play. Better deal. But not likely.

I understand that and like I said those days are long gone for me, as I found it to largely be a waste of my time when I could simply grab something that kills and walk out the door. My days of trying to make silk purses are behind me. I don't own SX's and I almost never play my Fenders out anymore.
 
No, we're not talking about individual preferences, we're talking about the inability to test it out in a shootout like this.......


I think Jaco knew how to tweak a bass so he'd understand that Jamerson's setup wasn't permanent;)

You're taking this setup/playability thing way beyond the simple premise that..

A) You can't experience it in this shootout and
B) For many folks, it matters. It's important.

:cool:

This is the SX vs Fender in the mix thread.....not the SX vs Fender in the hand thread.

Because we can't test it, he didn't make it part of this thread.



I understand that and like I said those days are long gone for me, as I found it to largely be a waste of my time when I could simply grab something that kills and walk out the door. My days of trying to make silk purses are behind me. I don't own SX's and I almost never play my Fenders out anymore.

If I had the money, maybe, maybe I would too. Who knows, never say never, eh? I'm sure I'd love some of the finer basses out there, but I don't have that kind of cash to throw away, and for me it would be throwing it away. I'm not a good enough player to justify spending lots of cash on a bass. That would be asking my family to sacrifice too much for what is essentially a hobby for me. But I do appreciate the "art" in what a great luthier can do. I can manage fine with a working man's bass. I enjoy modding to an extent...lots of people from my day did pretty well with modded/parts basses & guitars...Eddie Van Halen, Billy Sheehan, Jeff Berlin, oh yeah, Jaco, many others...so I know I don't need a high end bass, but I do appreciate the beauty and art of a well made boutique, and I don't have a problem with other people owning them...it just out of my league, honestly. And I like my league, so it's all good.:cool:
 
It would be great if more people kept that in mind. Everyone doesn't play on the same level... what might be fine for one might not cut it for another.

BTW boutique basses don't have to cost alot of money. I've come across several that were in the range of what many have spent on an SX with
mods.

BTW 2 Most of the wins declared weren't qualified on only being in the mix.
:cool:
 
As a side note, have you seen this poll Brad? ;)

Yes, I know... it's not scientific, and a very small sample, but still the results are interesting.

http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showthread.php?p=9235170&highlight=#post9235170

Let me know when most of TB has responded... then we can get to the rest of the world;)


From the posted responses it looks like some people are taking it like you asked them if they are solo players (I brought up the difference between being a solo player and playing alone in this thread IIRC).

Why not just ask: "Are you in a band?"?
:D

Here's possibly a better thread idea: "How many of you know about Talkbass?". My guess is that most will respond in the affirmative.

;)

Again, I doubt most bass players play in a band. I doubt most people play well enough to play in a band.
 
Let me know when most of TB has responded... then we can get to the rest of the world;)


From the posted responses it looks like some people are taking it like you asked them if they are solo players (I brought up the difference between being a solo player and playing alone in this thread IIRC).

Why not just ask: "Are you in a band?"?
:D

Here's possibly a better thread idea: "How many of you know about Talkbass?". My guess is that most will respond in the affirmative.

;)

Again, I doubt most bass players play in a band. I doubt most people play well enough to play in a band.


... because I'm willing to bet lots of people play with others acompanying them that aren't in an actual formal band, yet still play in a band type setting (i.e. jam with friends etc) where "in the mix" would certainly come into play.

I think the wording covered the difference between "solist" and "playing by yourself, in a non performance, just for fun type setting"

I think that was maybe not said specificly, but I honestly think people would get the gist of that.

I thought the wording was fairly clear... but I could be wrong. ;)
 
Whether or not someone currently plays in a band makes a difference in this thread because................


because in an earlier part of this thread, Brad and I were discussing the subject. ;) and how important "in the mix" is , or isn't to us.

It was also notated "as a side note" ;)


I stated that I believe that most bass players play in some sort of "band" type setting , so how a bass sounds "in a mix" has a fair amount to quite a bit of importance. (required IMO)

Brad stated he believes otherwise as in .. most bass players DON'T play in some sort of band setting. (correct me if I'm wrong Brad:) )

That's what this has to do with the thread. As the O.P. I feel fine going there :D

... plus it makes for a fun related type discussion. :)
 
because in an earlier part of this thread, Brad and I were discussing the subject. ;) and how important "in the mix" is , or isn't to us.

It was also notated "as a side note" ;)


I stated that I believe that most bass players play in some sort of "band" type setting , so how a bass sounds "in a mix" has a fair amount to quite a bit of importance. (required IMO)

Brad stated he believes otherwise as in .. most bass players DON'T play in some sort of band setting. (correct me if I'm wrong Brad:) )

That's what this has to do with the thread. As the O.P. I feel fine going there :D

... plus it makes for a fun related type discussion. :)


Sorry, I missed the side note part. For some reason I thought the point of comparing SX's and Fenders' in the mix was getting convoluted, with a new criteria being added.

There are live bands out there ( usually kids starting out) that have bass players, guitarists, drummers etc with few skills and are more concerned with volume competition than what the over all mix is like. Hopefully the lessons learned from going into a studio can be invaluable for a new awareness about the overall mix. The band should be much tighter on stage after spending hours in a studio listening to the parts being put together.........and this has nothing to do with whatever point I was attempting to make...:hmm: