• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Ignacio (Nacho) Banos - Nacho standard ‘51 P reissue?

Rumblefisher

Supporting Member
Aug 22, 2007
4,961
4,117
Hey guys, does anyone have in-hand experience with these basses?

I get that they are meant to be faithful repros of the original bass with some masterfully artful relicing…how’s the actual craftsmanship though? It looks to be stellar, but I have no way of trying one out…at $6500 apiece and a year long wait list, I’m intrigued but timid.

On a separate note, do you think they’ll gain value over time? Not that that’s a motivator, more of a mental mastur-youknowwhat exercise.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3970.jpeg
    IMG_3970.jpeg
    503.1 KB · Views: 20
  • IMG_3969.jpeg
    IMG_3969.jpeg
    372.9 KB · Views: 20
  • IMG_3971.jpeg
    IMG_3971.jpeg
    487.3 KB · Views: 17
  • IMG_3972.jpeg
    IMG_3972.jpeg
    580.7 KB · Views: 19
  • IMG_3973.jpeg
    IMG_3973.jpeg
    541.3 KB · Views: 18
  • IMG_3974.jpeg
    IMG_3974.jpeg
    353.7 KB · Views: 19
  • IMG_3975.jpeg
    IMG_3975.jpeg
    619.7 KB · Views: 16
  • IMG_3976.jpeg
    IMG_3976.jpeg
    723.5 KB · Views: 19
  • IMG_3977.jpeg
    IMG_3977.jpeg
    719.2 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_3978.jpeg
    IMG_3978.jpeg
    448.5 KB · Views: 17
  • IMG_3979.jpeg
    IMG_3979.jpeg
    666.8 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_3980.jpeg
    IMG_3980.jpeg
    547.5 KB · Views: 15
  • IMG_3981.jpeg
    IMG_3981.jpeg
    305.8 KB · Views: 17
  • IMG_3982.jpeg
    IMG_3982.jpeg
    370.5 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_3983.jpeg
    IMG_3983.jpeg
    584.5 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_3984.jpeg
    IMG_3984.jpeg
    403.4 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_3985.jpeg
    IMG_3985.jpeg
    403.2 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_3986.jpeg
    IMG_3986.jpeg
    1.1 MB · Views: 12
  • IMG_3987.jpeg
    IMG_3987.jpeg
    1 MB · Views: 16
  • IMG_3988.jpeg
    IMG_3988.jpeg
    630.3 KB · Views: 16
  • IMG_3989.jpeg
    IMG_3989.jpeg
    548.6 KB · Views: 15
  • IMG_3990.jpeg
    IMG_3990.jpeg
    511 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_3991.jpeg
    IMG_3991.jpeg
    650.4 KB · Views: 16
  • IMG_3992.jpeg
    IMG_3992.jpeg
    396.3 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_3993.jpeg
    IMG_3993.jpeg
    658.1 KB · Views: 17
  • IMG_3994.jpeg
    IMG_3994.jpeg
    560.1 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_3995.jpeg
    IMG_3995.jpeg
    617 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_3996.jpeg
    IMG_3996.jpeg
    936.2 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_3997.jpeg
    IMG_3997.jpeg
    433.7 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_3998.jpeg
    IMG_3998.jpeg
    605.5 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_3999.jpeg
    IMG_3999.jpeg
    680.7 KB · Views: 16
  • IMG_4001.jpeg
    IMG_4001.jpeg
    501.9 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_4002.jpeg
    IMG_4002.jpeg
    603.7 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_4003.jpeg
    IMG_4003.jpeg
    1.1 MB · Views: 19
  • IMG_4004.jpeg
    IMG_4004.jpeg
    640.4 KB · Views: 15
  • IMG_4005.jpeg
    IMG_4005.jpeg
    553.1 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_4006.jpeg
    IMG_4006.jpeg
    421.2 KB · Views: 17
  • IMG_4008.jpeg
    IMG_4008.jpeg
    679.9 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_4009.jpeg
    IMG_4009.jpeg
    630.2 KB · Views: 15
  • IMG_4010.jpeg
    IMG_4010.jpeg
    714.4 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_4011.jpeg
    IMG_4011.jpeg
    412.6 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_4012.jpeg
    IMG_4012.jpeg
    592.7 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_4013.jpeg
    IMG_4013.jpeg
    479.9 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_4014.jpeg
    IMG_4014.jpeg
    740.3 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_4015.jpeg
    IMG_4015.jpeg
    765.3 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_4016.jpeg
    IMG_4016.jpeg
    505.1 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_4017.jpeg
    IMG_4017.jpeg
    525.3 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_4018.jpeg
    IMG_4018.jpeg
    394.7 KB · Views: 16
  • IMG_4019.jpeg
    IMG_4019.jpeg
    624.4 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_4020.jpeg
    IMG_4020.jpeg
    385.9 KB · Views: 18
part 2: more photos :)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4021.jpeg
    IMG_4021.jpeg
    550.6 KB · Views: 11
  • IMG_4022.jpeg
    IMG_4022.jpeg
    1 MB · Views: 9
  • IMG_4023.jpeg
    IMG_4023.jpeg
    433.7 KB · Views: 10
  • IMG_4024.jpeg
    IMG_4024.jpeg
    648 KB · Views: 10
  • IMG_4025.jpeg
    IMG_4025.jpeg
    466.9 KB · Views: 10
  • IMG_4026.jpeg
    IMG_4026.jpeg
    752 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_4027.jpeg
    IMG_4027.jpeg
    683.1 KB · Views: 10
  • IMG_4028.jpeg
    IMG_4028.jpeg
    677.5 KB · Views: 11
  • IMG_4029.jpeg
    IMG_4029.jpeg
    451.8 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_4030.jpeg
    IMG_4030.jpeg
    369.1 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_4031.jpeg
    IMG_4031.jpeg
    456.4 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_4032.jpeg
    IMG_4032.jpeg
    555.6 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_4033.jpeg
    IMG_4033.jpeg
    613.6 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_4034.jpeg
    IMG_4034.jpeg
    507.9 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_4035.jpeg
    IMG_4035.jpeg
    636.1 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_4037.jpeg
    IMG_4037.jpeg
    989.1 KB · Views: 11
  • IMG_4038.jpeg
    IMG_4038.jpeg
    377.8 KB · Views: 10
  • IMG_4039.jpeg
    IMG_4039.jpeg
    514.9 KB · Views: 10
  • IMG_4040.jpeg
    IMG_4040.jpeg
    627.5 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_4041.jpeg
    IMG_4041.jpeg
    417.3 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_4042.jpeg
    IMG_4042.jpeg
    284 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_4043.jpeg
    IMG_4043.jpeg
    769 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_4044.jpeg
    IMG_4044.jpeg
    714.8 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_4045.jpeg
    IMG_4045.jpeg
    556.4 KB · Views: 14
They're actually putting Tadeo Gomez & Gloria's names on these?? Making a recreation is one thing but copping those names is a bit too much for me. If you are going that far why not add the headstock logo or shape it correctly, or add the proper serial # to the bridge [rhetorical question because it would instantly be considered a counterfeit, whereas the other names are hidden from view once assembled]?

A very nice example of an aftermarket '52 slab but a little too cute by 1/2, especially at that price.
 
They're actually putting Tadeo Gomez & Gloria's names on these?? Making a recreation is one thing but copping those names is a bit too much for me. If you are going that far why not add the headstock logo or shape it correctly, or add the proper serial # to the bridge [rhetorical question because it would instantly be considered a counterfeit, whereas the other names are hidden from view once assembled]?

A very nice example of an aftermarket '52 slab but a little too cute by 1/2, especially at that price.

See, I kinda like that. I get entirely what you are saying! I take it as a sign of respect not only for Leo but for Tad and Gloria, recognizing their work and efforts in creating iconic instruments.

I'm of two minds on this...on the one hand, Fenders were supposed to be serviceable, assembly line instruments...tools for a purpose built well enough to handle some beating. To that end, it's almost comical that a boutique replica would go for so much as it's striving to simply be what the instruments once were. On the other hand, there is a crazy amount of work and detail that have gone into these and the cost is certainly justified in paying for a lifetime of skill to get to the point of being able to build them this way.

At what point do these cross over into less bass and more artwork?
 
At what point do these cross over into less bass and more artwork?
If it plays & sounds how you want, it's a bass. If it only hangs on the wall or on the stand, it's art.

I get it to a certain extent, especially having owned a '52 made by Tadeo Gomez. But that's also why I have an issue with it. To each, their own.
 
If it plays & sounds how you want, it's a bass. If it only hangs on the wall or on the stand, it's art.

I get it to a certain extent, especially having owned a '52 made by Tadeo Gomez. But that's also why I have an issue with it. To each, their own.

Absolutely, totally get it!
Heck if I could afford a TG I'd get that in a second! :)
How was the '52 if you don't mind my asking?
 
Absolutely, totally get it!
Heck if I could afford a TG I'd get that in a second! :)
How was the '52 if you don't mind my asking?
It was a great bass, but this was back in 89-90. So the price wasn't as stratospheric as they are today.

Mine was a bit of a puzzle since it had an aluminum pg [years before the gold anodized pg Fender would reproduce by 1957] and a 2 color sunburst [a couple years before Fender used it on the mid 50's P bass]. Neither George Fullerton or George Gruhn could determine if it was an employee one off [which was somewhat common in the early days] or why it was configured that way. It had the TG & date on the neck & Tadeo & date on the body.

52 P bass.jpeg

[on the right]
1732805195476.png


52 P Bass_1024.jpg


thumb_Coke Machine, Fender Basses_1024.jpg
 
It was a great bass, but this was back in 89-90. So the price wasn't as stratospheric as they are today.

Mine was a bit of a puzzle since it had an aluminum pg [years before the gold anodized pg Fender would reproduce by 1957] and a 2 color sunburst [a couple years before Fender used it on the mid 50's P bass]. Neither George Fullerton or George Gruhn could determine if it was an employee one off [which was somewhat common in the early days] or why it was configured that way. It had the TG & date on the neck & Tadeo & date on the body.

View attachment 7087786
[on the right]
View attachment 7087787

View attachment 7087788

View attachment 7087789

You, sir, are one bad hombre!
 
Hey guys, does anyone have in-hand experience with these basses?

I get that they are meant to be faithful repros of the original bass with some masterfully artful relicing…how’s the actual craftsmanship though? It looks to be stellar, but I have no way of trying one out…at $6500 apiece and a year long wait list, I’m intrigued but timid.

On a separate note, do you think they’ll gain value over time? Not that that’s a motivator, more of a mental mastur-youknowwhat exercise.
I know of his Tele Blackguard replicas. You will not be disappointed.