• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Irreversible climate damage is imminent

May 5, 2011
2,644
366
Uh oh. if this is true, there's really no hope left at this point. But, things will continue business as useful of course. Sad really. Even if, by an odd change of heart, American businesses do start to care, Russia and China will still run the Earth into well... the ground.
 
global-warming.jpg
 
its all perception.

Most people work inside climate controlled buildings all day, so anything over 82 is hell.

I work outdoors, under cars, and it can be 110 degrees down there.


So when i get home and its 89 in the house, it feels kinda chilly. My roommates in their bubbles all day think its sweltering.
 
The only thing that's up for debate is the human contribution to global climate change, not climate change itself.

I don't even think that that is up for debate.. Considering what we have done to the environment over the last 200 years .. between greenhouse gasses and deforestation.. I mean.. anything can be debated.. You can debate whether or not life begins at conception or whether or not we are alone in the universe too.. but the facts are pretty obvious.. at least to me..but hey..
 
More greenhouse gases are released by the oceans alone than by humans. The climate has changed even before humans became industrialized. Climate change isn't caused by us and our attempts at reversing it is only proof of the fact that we want to play god. Let the world fix itself. The earth knows what's best better than we do. Oh, I give credit to George Carlin for most of that.
 
The only thing that's up for debate is the human contribution to global climate change, not climate change itself.

Actually there are four things up for debate.

1) How serious is the change in climate that is occurring and has it leveled off? And have the books been cooked by some in the scientific community, the hockey stick for instance is a complete fraud?

2) Are humans actually contributing to climate change?

3) If so, how much, what percentage?

4) Do humans have the capacity to reverse it?

There has been plenty of other climate changes within history. In the early 1600s we went thru a mini-ice age. In the 1300s we went thru a warming period that in parts of the world were we kept records was warmer than the current period. Humans somehow survived thru those period. I do believe we in the West need to have a smaller Carbon footprint, not because I'm convinced CO2 emissions are changing the climate as much as we simply can't afford all of the stuff we believe we need.
 
Actually there are four things up for debate.

1) How serious is the change in climate that is occurring and has it leveled off? And have the books been cooked by some in the scientific community, the hockey stick for instance is a complete fraud?

2) Are humans actually contributing to climate change?

3) If so, how much, what percentage?

4) Do humans have the capacity to reverse it?

There has been plenty of other climate changes within history. In the early 1600s we went thru a mini-ice age. In the 1300s we went thru a warming period that in parts of the world were we kept records was warmer than the current period. Humans somehow survived thru those period. I do believe we in the West need to have a smaller Carbon footprint, not because I'm convinced CO2 emissions are changing the climate as much as we simply can't afford all of the stuff we believe we need.

I think you misinterpreted what I said just a bit.

1) My response didn't have much to do with the degree of climate change only it's existence.

2) Agreed.

3) See number 1

4) Didn't directly address this in my response.
 
Uh oh. if this is true, there's really no hope left at this point. But, things will continue business as useful of course. Sad really. Even if, by an odd change of heart, American businesses do start to care, Russia and China will still run the Earth into well... the ground.

I'd speculate that we're likely past the point of "reversing" climate change.

It would be useful if the scientific community would better define the dangers rather than just saying "dangerous levels" or similar statements.

Then again, many of the projections make overstatements about the future availability of carbon energy. Essentially, so much carbon has already been transferred from the geosphere (coal, oil, natural gas, etc.) to the atmosphere that the geosphere doesn't contain as much of those resources as is assumed. Although I doubt that matters a whole lot.
 
"climate change" was invented so a cabal of evil billionnaire scientists who ride around in solid gold limos can kick dirt in the face of poor, innocent manufacturing and oil company CEOs who live in leaky bedsits and just want the best for everyone. FACT.

also, Al Gore is a lizard.
 
knumbskull said:
"climate change" was invented so a cabal of evil billionnaire scientists who ride around in solid gold limos can kick dirt in the face of poor, innocent manufacturing and oil company CEOs who live in leaky bedsits and just want the best for everyone. FACT.

also, Al Gore is a lizard.

Good thing I wasn't drinking anything while I read that :D
 
More greenhouse gases are released by the oceans alone than by humans. The climate has changed even before humans became industrialized. Climate change isn't caused by us and our attempts at reversing it is only proof of the fact that we want to play god. Let the world fix itself. The earth knows what's best better than we do. Oh, I give credit to George Carlin for most of that.

George Carlin was funny but... did you ever actually think about any of that? :D
 

Latest posts