On the subject of global warming...
Bass players = right.
Scientists = wrong.
Makes sense to me.



Bass players = right.
Scientists = wrong.
Makes sense to me.


TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.


On the subject of global warming...
Bass players = right.
Scientists = wrong.
Makes sense to me.![]()
![]()
No, I'm not saying that anyone who disagrees with me here is stupid enough to drink poison Kool-Aid.
I will however say that there people here too stupid to understand the modern vernacular meaning of the phrase, "Drank the Kool-Aid."
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Drank the Kool-Aid&defid=893924
I defer to experts when I am above my pay grade. A good deal of science is admittedly above my pay grade. The difference between me and a good number of others is I seem to be aware when I am in above my pay grade.Unrepresented, what is your opinion of SC24 and how it impacts the earths temperature?
Fair enough. I was just curious...I defer to experts when I am above my pay grade. A good deal of science is admittedly above my pay grade. The difference between me and a good number of others is I seem to be aware when I am in above my pay grade.
Solar radiation is above my pay grade. I suspect it's above the pay grade of most in this thread.
I think it's kind of funny whenever someone thinks the "conspirators" of Global Climate Change are in it for the money because there's so much to be made in renewable/cleaner energy. Big Oil would never fib on a grand scale about Climate Change in order to continue to be the most profitable corporations in the history of the world. Nah.
Sad but true.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Yes. Money rules everything. That's why they're motivating consumers to spend it in a way that more accurately reflects long term expenses.Isn't money to be made in alternative energy if you take away the subsidies. There is however enormous amouts of regulatory control over the populace to be gained as well as billions to be made trading "carbon credits".
As with anything.....follow the money.
If Yosemite doesn't have a super eruption it will matter still.Munjibunga said it best.
If Yellowstone has a super eruption, all this won't matter at all.
Munjibunga said it best.
If Yellowstone has a super eruption, all this won't matter at all.
Please do.Isn't money to be made in alternative energy if you take away the subsidies. There is however enormous amouts of regulatory control over the populace to be gained as well as billions to be made trading "carbon credits".
As with anything.....follow the money.
If Yosemite doesn't have a super eruption it will matter still.

Please do.
