• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Is anyone playing current Top 40?

Will bar bands in 2050 still be playing Wagon Wheel, Sweet Home Alabama and Brown Eyed Girl?

If there still are rock/pop-rock bands playing in 2050, the odds are pretty good. Do jazz bands still playing "All of Me" and "Summertime"?

That's not unlike the niche into which guitar-band music has drifted at this point: another chapter of standards in the great-American-popular-song tradition. As with jazz standards, it's not that the m ost popular tunes are currently popular, it's that they're recognizeable for having once been popular.

Popular-classic is a brand identity, whether it's Coke or the Rolling Stones or Apple. People like them because they come already packaged in expectations as "here's an enormously popular thing that millions of people like, and have liked for a long time."
 
Most of my gigs this year have been with a corporate events/wedding band, jazz standards through recent(ish) hits. Brand new songs generally don't work in those contexts, b/c not a wide enough swath of the room knows them yet.

The sweet spot: songs that were already established floor-fillers when the mid-20s to early 30s bride and wedding party were in high school or college. Not the same as songs that were fresh pop or club hits at the time.

So, Billie Jean and I Wanna Dance w/ Somebody still/always pack a floor, as does Wannabe. We're getting great response this year from Kygo's (2019?) Higher Love (a remix of Whitney's cover of a Stevie Winwood tune).

But unless a current hit is the rare huge hit across popular culture, it seems to take a year or two or three for it to circulate widely enough that it creates a buzz around the entire hall when we play the opening bars. And even then, in this era of fractured playlists, really wide recognition takes time.

Take three pretty similar songs. Rihanna's 2011 "We Found Love" tends to get a bigger "I know this one!" bump from the crowd than Sia's 2016 "Cheap Thrills," which in turn gets more bump than Ava Max's 2018 "Sweet but Psycho."

In my experience over a lot of gigs, none of that vintage of songs (including hits by Usher, the Weeknd, Camila Cabello, etc) currently sparks a mixed-ages event crowd to the extent that Whitney and Lady Gaga and even Britney do. In ten years, maybe some of those recent songs will have stuck around long enough to build ubiquitous recognition. My guess is most won't.

Mega-hits operate on a different level than standard/club hits. But even among the of crop mega-hits released within the past decade, most have been squeezed so many times that they're losing their juice. People still hit the floor for a once-was-everywhere hit like Happy or Get Lucky or Crazy, but those are all well off their peak response, even by the behind-the-curve standards of wedding reception crowds, without yet having rebounded into a nostalgic sweet spot. These are the more likely songs to feel like canonical hits in another ten years.
 
Last edited:
If there still are rock/pop-rock bands playing in 2050, the odds are pretty good. Do jazz bands still playing "All of Me" and "Summertime"?

That's not unlike the niche into which guitar-band music has drifted at this point: another chapter of standards in the great-American-popular-song tradition. As with jazz standards, it's not that the m ost popular tunes are currently popular, it's that they're recognizeable for having once been popular.

Popular-classic is a brand identity, whether it's Coke or the Rolling Stones or Apple. People like them because they come already packaged in expectations as "here's an enormously popular thing that millions of people like, and have liked for a long time."

Those songs, god, I hope not..and I'm only half joking.

Once in a blue moon on a dep gig that isnt filler...maybe, just maybe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EastCoastThump
I feel ya. None of those LCD songs are on my home-listening playlists. But they play a ceremonial role in drawing all the grans, aunties, nieces, and nephews, far-flung friends, etc to affirm by joining in on the dance floor, even when some/many of them aren't dancers.

Sure, probably as long as there have been ceremonies, some bearded wizened dude in a wooden wolf mask and fur cape wondered while plucking his lute, "By Gaia! will it ever end? Do we really have to perform the same tired shadow-play song and dance schtick at the harvest moon festival again this year? Can't this season's ceremonies include some more artsy/challenging bits that aren't as old as dirt?"

I definitely have contexts in which I play/explore music mostly for myself. But I don't need music to always be about me. And maybe I just have a high tolerance for repetition in ceremonial contexts, especially when big crowds of people are throwing themselves into it with transport, abandon, and positive vibes. But I don't mind playing the usual wedding fare at weddings. I'm not especially church-y, but I look at it as a kind of musical ministry, a giving back.

IDK, maybe some musicians feel a simliar way about greasing the Dionysian bar scene with the latest pop banger.
 
Last edited: