Wait, what?Led Zeppelin, like the Beatles, and Grateful Dead, were infinitely more popular, than they were good.
Where I grew up, all of the Stoners liked Zeppelin, while the Musicians preferred Deep Purple.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Wait, what?Led Zeppelin, like the Beatles, and Grateful Dead, were infinitely more popular, than they were good.
Where I grew up, all of the Stoners liked Zeppelin, while the Musicians preferred Deep Purple.
Paice much better player than Bonham. Blackmore smokes Page. Jon Lord is King of the B3. Ian's voice is ten times stronger than Plants etc etc.. Zeppelin vs Purple live...no contest..Purple by a mile.
Paice much better player than Bonham. Blackmore smokes Page. Jon Lord is King of the B3. Ian's voice is ten times stronger than Plants etc etc.. Zeppelin vs Purple live...no contest..Purple by a mile.
I have to agree about originality. If you compare Led Zeppelin debut with Deep Purple In Rock, LZ I is a quite derivative blues rock material, while In Rock is much more original and unique musically.
LZ did boost the careers of blues artists more than Purple, although not so much some of the acoustic guitarists Page may have also, er, been inspired by. I saw a YouTube post praising Page for genius on two pieces which Page, er, borrowed.
LZ1 is effectively a covers album, but later LZ albums had great original material and for more variety than DP's writing. The only time DP stepped outside the box imo was with Glenn Hughes' soul-influenced input, which Blackmore famously referred to as "shoe shine music". Ps that's Blackmore's phrase not mine and apologies if anyone is offended by it - I know I am.
You must mean Davey Graham and/or Bert Jansch, who definitely "influenced" Page's acoustic playing a tad![]()
LZ2 has a lot of covers, although in some cases somewhat more radical ones. I find some of the later ones have some great stuff and some filler on, though. D'yer Make'Er, for example, I absolutely can't stand. Very patchy after House of the Holy, IMHO. After LZ Plant did really great stuff, though, so I don't know what was going on in LZ 74-80.
Edit: Plant is still doing great stuff.
Zep were better composers of a wider variety of pop music.Your thoughts? Are these two bands in the same league? If not, why?
I think the European and American perspective on DP vs. LZ are quite different.
In America Deep Purple are generally not considered to be the same tier as Zep, while in Europe Zep and Purple are considered the same tier, because in Europe Deep Purple generally have a much higher status than in the USA. In America Zep could have a status "the ultimate rock gods". That was always my impression. Maybe I'm wrong.
Let's discuss.