• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Is 'Raking' bad?

R

Rogue181

Jan 13, 2007
9
0
Canada
#1
When I'm playing on one string or moving from a low (piched) string to a high one I alternate 'twixt my middle and index finger on my right hand. However, when I move from a high string to a lower one (eg G to D) I tend to use the the same finger to 'rake' the two strings, which breaks the alternating pattern. I think this might slow me down; should I always alternate fingers, even when traveling down a string?:bassist:
 
#2
If it was good enough for jaco, its good enough for everyone else.

I personally find raking to be far more efficient when moving from a higher tuned string to a lower tuned string because your finger is already moving in that direction. however i find it easier to alternate on the way up.

it takes some practice to get it sounding smooth but its worth it in the end.
 
#6
You guys trying to get me started again? Of course raking's bad! But I've discovered that the rakers are always going to defend raking with faulty arguments like the Jamerson thing and the "economy of motion" nonsense. So whatever. I'm done saving the world.
 
#11
Hey JimmyM,

I can think of one good reason why raking is bad. Most of the time you move down by 1 string but every once in a while you move down by 2. If you're used to raking it's going to feel REAL weird to alternate fingers to jump 2 strings down since you usually never alternate fingers when going down strings (in terms of numbers the vast majority of movement along strings is going to be the next string up or down).

Basically you'd have to put aside alot of practice time to get that 2 string jump so you can pull it off properly whenever it shows up.

I don't rake that reason. Is your reason different?
 
#12
JimmyM said:
You guys trying to get me started again? Of course raking's bad! But I've discovered that the rakers are always going to defend raking with faulty arguments like the Jamerson thing and the "economy of motion" nonsense. So whatever. I'm done saving the world.
Click to expand...

Well, tell you what. Rather than get into the flak of assertions of faultiness with no support, and since I don't have a gig at the moment, I'll start a regimen of practice dedicated to exploring alternating versus raking. I'll also explore anchor, movable anchor, and floating and report from time to time. How about that? I just got my first 5-string and it is already apparent I need to revisit some fundamentals, so I am open to anything.


Scott
 
#14
Scottgun said:
Well, tell you what. Rather than get into the flak of assertions of faultiness with no support, and since I don't have a gig at the moment, I'll start a regimen of practice dedicated to exploring alternating versus raking. I'll also explore anchor, movable anchor, and floating and report from time to time. How about that? I just got my first 5-string and it is already apparent I need to revisit some fundamentals, so I am open to anything.


Scott
Click to expand...

according to Jimmy M in the thread I started a month ago, someone did this for a month and said alternating was the way to go.

FWIW, I've been trying to do alternating for the past 1-2 months and I already find my playing to be cleaner. I had sloppy technique before, whether I raked or alternated, but sticking to simply alternating has gotten me to be more accurate. I've also been trying to do floating thumb, movable anchor, etc...The floating thumb is very nice but I tend to dig in too much when I play and it kills everything for me. I would need todd johnson's DVD to develop floating thumb properly. For now, I've been sticking to movable anchor and it works fine.

The main point is do whatever feels right as long as you can play clean at fast speeds.
 
#16
elpelotero said:
according to Jimmy M in the thread I started a month ago, someone did this for a month and said alternating was the way to go.

FWIW, I've been trying to do alternating for the past 1-2 months and I already find my playing to be cleaner. I had sloppy technique before, whether I raked or alternated, but sticking to simply alternating has gotten me to be more accurate. I've also been trying to do floating thumb, movable anchor, etc...The floating thumb is very nice but I tend to dig in too much when I play and it kills everything for me. I would need todd johnson's DVD to develop floating thumb properly. For now, I've been sticking to movable anchor and it works fine.

The main point is do whatever feels right as long as you can play clean at fast speeds.
Click to expand...

Fair enough. I think I mostly do alternating anyway (I've played so long I don't pay attention), but I will still concentrate on it since some bad habits have creeped into my technique.
 
#20
Oops. I guess I'll do a search next time!:D I think I'll try to alternate for a while. Raking comes more naturaly to me, but when I get into complicated lines, my right hand losses it's rythem and generaly gets confused. While I'm rethinking my technique, I'll try the movable anchor to. Thanks for the input guys! :bassist:
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back