I'm both fine with them cos it's a bass and detest the whole concept behind it all unless there is some sonic benefit to the mass, which is likely moot to me cos I bet my $200 #1 beats them hands down.
So let's see this $200 beast!!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'm both fine with them cos it's a bass and detest the whole concept behind it all unless there is some sonic benefit to the mass, which is likely moot to me cos I bet my $200 #1 beats them hands down.
Supposedly more neck contact gives more sustain. Also can provide a little extra weight and can “center” a bass on your body (less neck dive) if the builder is real savvy. Some people just like the look. I think some single cut designs look stunning! Others, less so.
And were they valid?
Or where they poo and jokes?
Those who are looking for jokes and negatives will find hundreds.
Those who are looking one advantage need no more than one.
http://www.melvinleedavis.com/images/Contrabass Conception.pdf
This above article is the total sum of all the advantages.
This topic has been resolved a while ago.
One advantage is that it makes those with a double cut bass feel threatened and spew snark.
Why sure!Considering the fact that I myself own double cut basses!Stereotype double-cut players much?
Why sure!Considering the fact that I myself own double cut basses!
View attachment 4660310
)Yes.Whoa, dude, that’s a very nice set of basses!..
Is that middle bass a Ned Steinburg (is that right?)-designed instrument?
Thanx for sharing. Very cool!
(snark generator off…)
Yes.
An NS/Stick.
A collaboration between Emmett Chapman and Ned Steinberger.
Ah yes, this ol’ classic Talkbass chestnut, “my $200 bass beats all expensive boutique basses” haven’t seen that one in a while. Glad you could dust it off.I'm both fine with them cos it's a bass and detest the whole concept behind it all unless there is some sonic benefit to the mass, which is likely moot to me cos I bet my $200 #1 beats them hands down.
In the end, it's a shape.
What's the advantage of the T-bird shape?
Or the Mustang shape?
The Gibson EB shape?
And the Fender shape? What's that? What's the advantage of that shape? It must be some, because a lot of boutique basses have that shape.
behold the beast of the bestSo let's see this $200 beast!!
I needn't play that card with this bass when my $30 Ibanez TR50 slays the competition in P bassland, sadly it sits as my P killer out-performs all comers. thx for engaging lolAh yes, this ol’ classic Talkbass chestnut, “my $200 bass beats all expensive boutique basses” haven’t seen that one in a while. Glad you could dust it off.
behold the beast of the best
View attachment 4660366
found it at our new GC and fell hard but didn't buy, fate made it come 2mos later @ 1/2 price.
I needn't play that card with this bass when my $30 Ibanez TR50 slays the competition in P bassland, sadly it sits as my P killer out-performs all comers. thx for engaging lol
please prove it as much as I can and then we'll talk cos I'm into $5 basses!I'm both fine with that T-bird cos it's a bass and detest the whole concept behind it all unless there is some sonic benefit to the mass, which is likely moot to me cos I bet my $5 #1 beats them hands down.
i think you're being generous! lemme give it a try:It's those with the mentality that nothing should ever go beyond what is already done.
behold the beast of the best
![]()
found it at our new GC and fell hard but didn't buy, fate made it come 2mos later @ 1/2 price.
I needn't play that card with this bass when my $30 Ibanez TR50 slays the competition in P bassland, sadly it sits as my P killer out-performs all comers. thx for engaging lol