+1, check it out. Still a great song, bombastic and pointless or not.The intro was stolen from Spirit, whom they toured with prior to recording SWTH. I believe the song they lifted it from is Taurus.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
+1, check it out. Still a great song, bombastic and pointless or not.The intro was stolen from Spirit, whom they toured with prior to recording SWTH. I believe the song they lifted it from is Taurus.
To each his own. You will never convince the millions world wide that love Zep, that Zep sucks. Look at the radio air play they have gotten over the years. Obviously not everyone thinks they suck. I don't know how old you are but if you were around during the 70's you should already be aware why people like them.
Now THAT's brilliant!!It's like guitar websites- don't criticize Zep or Stevie Ray.
Now here's a common comment I don't understand. Led Zepplin as great songwriters?!? Other than some nice riffs what songs are great? Certainly not that over-blown pointless drivel "Stairway to Heaven". It's a terrible song out of which they made a GREAT record. But the song doesn't stand alone from that particular performance and recording. Musically it's pretty lame except for the great bit of contrary motion in the acoustic guitar part. After that it descends into a pointless vamp. And the lyrics are awful. Plus it builds up to this great bombastic ending and all Plant could come up with to for that pseudo-majestic ending is "... to be a rock and not to roll"?? That makes John Anderson's lyrics seem coherent!
jte
Agreed. Listen to practically anything by John Scofield.
Cream was broken up well before 1970
I don't even really think this is a JB vs JPJ matter, I think Jack was throwing a shot out to the fact that even though LZ got back together for a while, they weren't the LZ that eveyone wanted to see--the LZ of the 70s is long dead--Plant can't sing in the same key and Page can't play like he used to. Bonham is gone...They aren't the same wild raucous rock band they used to be, and I think that JB is right for saying that (if thats what he meant lol)
I find myself amused and sad with this thread. It is fun to have the ol' "my favorite band is better than your favorite band" argument. However, the sadness lies in that there are no new, young bands that bring up any of this emotion. We have to wait for some sixty-year old former rock star to do or say something cool or outrageous. These people were old when I was a kid and now are grandparents. Sigh...rock is dead.
Actually, I did mean Jon Anderson of Yes, not the US country singer...
And I WAS around in the '70s. That's a large part of why I find the LZ worship so unfathomable. I was there, and they didn't sound all that interesting. Page's guitar solos (except for the brilliant, short, swinging, and completley composed one on "Whole Lotta Love") don't have the daring of Jeff Beck, the passion of Clapton, the virtuosity of McLaughlin, nor the ear-catching combination of all those atributes that Hendrix often showed. The singing is annoying.
While Cream's jams were often over blues changes, they also had really good songs that hold up beyond the specific performances. "Sunshine of Your Love" is a great riff, not a great song, just like "Whole Lotta Love". However, "Badge", "White Room", "Tales of Brave Ulysses", "We're Going Wrong", and I Feel Free are well written song in my estimation. OK, so SWBLAR and Pressed Rat and Warthog dont stand up so well however
I don't think radio play is any indicator of whether the band is good or great, only that they're popular. And generally speaking, popular tastes in pop oriented music often has less to do with the music than the era, and people's memories (real or imagined) of it.
All kidding aside, I think it's unfair to compare Clapton and Page. They're much different as musicians and personalities.
To me, Page was brilliant at playing whatever was necessary to make great records... he had a seemingly unlimited supply of riffs, tones, techniques, and an amazing imagination. In some ways, he was the ultimate George Harrison-style guitarist, if you know what I mean. I think he was more versatile than Clapton.
Clapton has always been a blues musician, and, as a sensitive and somewhat damaged (early family issues) person, he's used his craft to "exorcise personal demons", to use a tired cliche. When he's fully engaged in playing the blues, as on "Have You Heard" from the "Bluesbreakers" album, or "Have You Ever Loved a Woman" from "Layla and Other Assorted Love Songs", his intensity (as well as his total mastery of the vocabulary) is absolutely frightening. When NOT playing the blues, he's always displayed an unmatched command of form and shape... his solos seem predestined, or something. I'm thinking of "While My Guitar Gently Weeps" from the Beatles' "White Album", "In the Presence of the Lord" from "Blind Faith", "Badge" from "Goodbye", "Tales of Brave Ulysses" and "Dance the Night Away" from "Disraeli Gears", and many others. Even his solo on "Change the World" is a little gem, IMO.
Page is a master -- maybe *the* master -- at sounding huge, like Godzilla; Clapton kills you by playing *one* note or phrase in just the right place, with exactly the right touch and tone. Words like "eloquent", "elegant" and "graceful" always come to my mind when I listen to Clapton. If those qualities don't do it for you, you'll always prefer Page, which is fine. Nothing beats "Misty Mountain Hop" when I'm cruising down the highway at 2:00 AM, deaf, toasted, and coming home from a gig.
It all depends on your taste and what you look for in music (of course).
Cream disbanded in 1969![]()