TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
RunngDog said:No, I think its more like you telling someone you don't like meat (or more specifically, "meat really sucks") because you tried liver once and didn't like it.

Brad Johnson said:What's really sad is that it still gets a rise out of people.
![]()

Rav said:My god it sucks.
Brad Johnson said:I could easily see someone coming to that conclusion about eating flesh. I can just as easily see others telling them they need to try eating other animal parts... 'til they see the light.
willgroove2 said:it's funny when i read mags like bass player ect when they interview guy's and they say"im not a techinical player" i always think the same thing;can't play very well.sometimes im wrong but most often im right IMO.there are a bunch of guy's in band's who are successful for a moment who can barely play but because their on mtv get far more notice than jaco,jeff berlin,gary willis ect put together,so therfore player who don't know anything go;this is what i should be like,this guy dosn't know the name of the notes and he's famous so why should i learn anything.i get this from new students all the time when they get challenged
Brad Johnson said:Does it really matter what he likes? Do you really care?
Not trying to be funny... it's an honest question.

RunngDog said:But then again, lots of TB threads cover lots of things that don't really matter to me. Do I really care whether someone buys a Zon or a Roscoe? Does it matter to me that someone's new Sadowsky just arrived?
RunngDog said:But then again, lots of TB threads cover lots of things that don't really matter to me. Do I really care whether someone buys a Zon or a Roscoe? Does it matter to me that someone's new Sadowsky just arrived?
RunngDog said:It would be easy enough to dismiss Rav's original post as trolling, but despite the ill-advised use of the word "sucks,"I think he has taken some pains to explain what exactly he didn't like about the one CD he's listened to. Fair enough. The fact is, that particular CD doesn't spend a lot of time in my CD player either. It's got some great playing, a lot of brilliance, but it really isn't a lot of fun. On the other hand, "8:30" and "Live in Italy" are a lot of fun -- great grooves, easy to listen to lightly for just the pleasure or more closely to appreciate the incredible playing. And if Rav is really interested in "getting" Jaco rather than just dismissing him, then he should take a listen to these. And if he still doesn't get it -- well, there's no accounting for taste.
Bruce Lindfield said:I see it as exactly the other way round - so it is sad that people can be so dismissive about a great talent, it is sad that people need to grab attention by putting others down.
Conversely, I see it as very encouraging that after all these years, so many people are still prepared to stick up for Jaco and what he achieved, despite his great difficulties and suffering with a condition that could be treated easily nowadays but was severely misunderstood then.
I am happy for his family, that most people still remember him for the positive things and not for his unfortunate and violent end!![]()
RunngDog said:Well, Brad, I think we've probably driven the meat analogy pretty well into the ground at this point.![]()
Sure, in the end it doesn't really matter to me whether or not Rav likes Jaco's music. But then again, lots of TB threads cover lots of things that don't really matter to me. Do I really care whether someone buys a Zon or a Roscoe? Does it matter to me that someone's new Sadowsky just arrived?
It would be easy enough to dismiss Rav's original post as trolling, but despite the ill-advised use of the word "sucks,"I think he has taken some pains to explain what exactly he didn't like about the one CD he's listened to. Fair enough. The fact is, that particular CD doesn't spend a lot of time in my CD player either. It's got some great playing, a lot of brilliance, but it really isn't a lot of fun. On the other hand, "8:30" and "Live in Italy" are a lot of fun -- great grooves, easy to listen to lightly for just the pleasure or more closely to appreciate the incredible playing. And if Rav is really interested in "getting" Jaco rather than just dismissing him, then he should take a listen to these. And if he still doesn't get it -- well, there's no accounting for taste.
But of course, in the end, it doesn't really matter.
JimK said:This is Talk Bass...afteralll.
![]()
two thoughts on that question;when i became more active on the song writing/production side of the music biz i had a number of conversations with,for want of a better word, "suits".one of the thing that was told to me over and over was that "we are trying to apeal to the lowest commen denomenater (sp)we are not trying to make art we are trying to make money"so therefore people are not given the chance to decide for themself because it's not promoted to them.my other thought is one i have said for years;if you played jazz or fusion as much and presented it the same way(video's,mag's,radio airplay)the numbers would make a major jump,remember jaco had a gold record with weather report in the '70s and artist such as diana krall and norah jones sell very well to this day although they are coming from a different school of jazz.people in general are able to understand and enjoy jazz in all it's different form's but because it's been ghettoized they don't hear it.play jaco as much as you play U2 on mtv and some kids(not all) will dig it IMOdlloyd said:Do you think kids would like Jaco and Jeff Berlin if they were on MTV?
Brad Johnson said:And I'm not saying people shouldn't talk. I'm actually asking someone to tell me why someone else's dislike of a particular musician's performance would upset them? I'd love for them to talk about that if they cared to.
willgroove2 said:two thoughts on that question;when i became more active on the song writing/production side of the music biz i had a number of conversations with,for want of a better word, "suits".one of the thing that was told to me over and over was that "we are trying to apeal to the lowest commen denomenater (sp)we are not trying to make art we are trying to make money"so therefore people are not given the chance to decide for themself because it's not promoted to them.
my other thought is one i have said for years;if you played jazz or fusion as much and presented it the same way(video's,mag's,radio airplay)the numbers would make a major jump,remember jaco had a gold record with weather report in the '70s and artist such as diana krall and norah jones sell very well to this day although they are coming from a different school of jazz.people in general are able to understand and enjoy jazz in all it's different form's but because it's been ghettoized they don't hear it.play jaco as much as you play U2 on mtv and some kids(not all) will dig it IMO
Brad Johnson said:Music should stand on it's own, shouldn't it? Obviously it doesn't but why does the background have to play into someone deciding to like something?
Why did you bring up his end?