Reading is fun-damental. It's very important to read charts as a starting point in Jazz. I never leave home without my Real Books. LOL...
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Here's what I wrote in post #17: Combo jazz is of course a different story -- players have varying levels of reading ability. You can get away without reading if you know tunes, have a killer ear, or can call which tunes are played.
What am I failing to imagine?
You are able to play jazz because you play a relatively beginner-friendly style in a sheltered environment in which your skills are sufficient. How does that help the OP, who just flunked an audition?
Your comments are reminiscent of beginners who protest that jazz is supposed to be about free expression, upon discovering that jazz is dense thicket of knowledge, rules, and traditions, with a steep learning curve. Improvisation is just part of it.
Now, you can go ahead and tell me that if I want rules, and written-out charts, then I might as well play classical. It turns out that I love classical music too, as do a lot of jazz players. I know a lot of jazz players who really don't care what jazz is, or even whether they are referred to as jazz musicians.
Now if you play bass in a jazz band where some one else writes the part that you have to play, that's another story. But if that's the case then it's not really jazz anymore in my book. Jazz is every musician doing their own thing, improvising within the context of a tune (among other things).

If you want to hang with a traditional combo and not read, you're going to need to have a couple hundred essential standards memorized. You don't need to read to memorize tunes.
If it's a group that plays originals then you are probably going to need to read their tunes unless the composer is willing to teach you the charts.
It surprised me that no one took the position that it is not necessary to read to play jazz. I play with an awesome piano player every weekend. He sounds like a recording artist but can't read his way out of a paper bag. The trick is, he knows several hundred tunes that he learned from records. Remember, jazz was a folk music before it was accepted in academia.
I wish my ears were better. I get overly dependent on reading and thinking through scales and chords. I'm trying to get past all that and just play by ear.
I have been playing for about 13 years and have real good technique and improv skill, not the best but better than average. I can basicaly play anything as long as someone sings hums or plays it on a piano. I auditioned for this jazz band and was rejected. I have been wanting to learn how to read music but havent, and dont even know where some of the notes are on the bass. I know how important it is to be able to read when playing in a jazz band, but would you reject that musician even though they are not limited to what they can play with their technique? Jazz players... any other hints or tips on how i can prevent from being rejected at another audition ? thanks guys
To all the nay sayers about reading music, can I ask a question. If you really loved your instrument, wouldnt you want to learn everything about it you could? Including reading music?

As I was saying - when you meet other musicians apart from guitarists - like Sax Players, Trumpeters etc. then they just take it for granted that they will be reading tunes from sheet music all the time...![]()
As I was saying - when you meet other musicians apart from guitarists - like Sax Players, Trumpeters etc. then they just take it for granted that they will be reading tunes from sheet music all the time...![]()
You really need a very good ear and good reading skills if you want to be in demand as a jazz bassist.
You can get away in some situations with one or the other, but nothing beats skills in both departments.
I think I'd concentrate on reading treble clef, you're more likely to be reading off of the other guys charts at some point. You can't count on having your own bass clef version of whatever fake book they happen to have. you're the only one that will read bass clef.
Maybe I'm biased, I started playing trumpet, so I read treble clef naturally, have to traspose bass clef music. I only had 1 band in 40 years that provided me with bass clef music.
If you're doing big band stuff though, they would have bass clef music. Just thinking out loud that it'd be easier to learn one or the other, rather than always switching back and forth. I learned to transpose piano music for trumpet (a C on a piano is a D on a trumpet), so wasn't too hard to transpose bass clef music to treble clef, once you've got that mindset to play a different note than you see.
Curious if anyone else who can read can read both bass and treble clef fluently, or do you transpose one to the other?
I instantly see the notes as if they were treble clef, from 10+ years of reading treble clef before switching to bass. So I have to transpose.
Randy
you're the only one that will read bass clef.
If you want to play the MAJORITY of music that existed before 1960, you read.

Also, get a few Aebersold play alongs. Start with a easier ones (you can't go by the volume number for difficulty rating though).