Depends on where you go for it. A generalization shouldn't offend you. The music education in England reflects the music education everywhere, which is generally poor. England's general music population has little interest in learning music, but a great deal of interest in performing it. I know England's educational system intimately. I know some of the schools, the teachers, and I know how the general community of players in England feel about academic learning. And it isn't very supportive of it, hence the generally low attention to musical fact, and only a few good schools dedicated in teaching it, but a huge focus by English players on gigs or performance. If you fall into either group, why be offended with a statement that fits your own personal musical standards? What music school do you study at? If you have learned something there, then what do you care if the general attitude isn't of your standard. Just applaud your own individual improvement because this is all that counts.
before we go any further, im Welsh, im not English!
i think your right about alot of people not wanting to learn about music, and that is their personal choice and theres nothing wrong with that, music is meant to be fun as well as a hobby/job etc.
i think its not about whos teaching you, but how much you want to learn, and about the targets, if any, you set yourself.
if your aiming to be the best musician you can be, then you'll do it, no matter whos teaching you, because you'll learn through other meens. and i think thats the case for everyone no matter where you are in the world. And that principle doesn't just apply to music either.
thats just my opinion anyways