• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Knobs or Sliders?

knobs or sliders?

  • knobs

    Votes: 40 54.8%
  • sliders

    Votes: 14 19.2%
  • both/either

    Votes: 19 26.0%

  • Total voters
    73
Pretty self explanatory, do you prefer an eq with knobs or sliders and why? I recently picked up a peavey firebass 700, I love the way is sounds and how solid it feels coming from a crate bx-100 combo, but I don't like the knob-based eq. I feel like sliders gives me a better visual representation of my settings.

Aw man, the Peavey Firebass 700 is such a kick butt amp !!! Congrats !! I LOVE the tone of those. My Peavey Cirrus through a Firebass 700 was tone heaven and I got a ton of compliments on the tone. I DO like the knobs and the simplicity of them. The contour knob is amazing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sartori
Knobs aren't as susceptible to chicken fat and beer spills like sliders.
Wide open slots are havens for lost food particles, toenail clippings and and hair balls.

Big big plus to this!
Pots are sealed, no chance for dust/dirt buildup.
Sliders (especially on stomp boxes, ie. 'flat' orientation) are just little buckets waiting to be filled with dust and dirt, causing pops and cracks when using the sliders.
I hope they kind of took that into account while designing it, and made it self-cleaning or smth ...

But for example the sliders on my EHX Micro Bass Synth were already feeling grindy after only a few weeks :| . Not a fan!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sartori
It all works. Just give me the frequency bands I like and it could be a slider, knob, touch screen or belt encoder for all I care. As long as it sounds okay.
FWIW, I'm often okay with bass/mid/treble, provided the bands are in useful places, but much prefer bass/low mid/high mid/treble. That said, I don't feel restricted in any way by my simple B-15.
 
They do, but all that matters is how it sounds. EQing with your eyes is a waste of time.
People have been doing it for years with the desired results. I've seen many lessons and gear reviews where people make EQ shapes that correlate to a certain style or sound in order to graphically depict scooping mids, cutting lows, etc.......... Sure, if you ONLY EQ'd with your eyes, then it *could* be a waste of time, but there are (hopefully) not many bass players who do that regularly, and many times they make GEq shapes and it actually works. I'm not sure why there are so many people on here that are so against them.
 
Mmmm, sliders
Sliders.jpg
...
 
i tend to play with everything pretty flat. So I don't feel like sliders are needed. Onboard eq on my stingray is normally everything wide open, on my sans amp I have a little lows and mids boosted but we're talking like 1 o'clock barely boosted. I also use a sonic maximizer specifically to control 50hz. For me it's very very rare that I adjust my eq at all. With the exception of the stingray which is a new addition my entire setup has been the same for years now. Im more about getting my tone from my fingers
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jeff Scott
As I've said before, I'd rather be slapped repeatedly about the face, head, and neck with a dead rabbit than have an amp with graphic EQ (or sliders). I prefer knobs with hard to read markings. It encourages me to set EQ with my...ears. :)

M. M.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jeff Scott

Latest posts