• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Lakland Owners Group #69

Sorry about that..

A Decade ain't for all..

What pickups are in it?

The stock ones, Chi-Sonics? The ones with the black ridged covers.

And the Decade hangs weird due to its odd shape. I too bought and sold one.

As for the Duck... unless you’re like me and can’t stand the sound of a single pickup split P equipped P bass, you should love it! I loved everything about mine except the sound. I should have had it routed for a jazz pickup at the bridge. I’d probably still have it.

It does hang weird, but the shape is what I liked about it. As for the Duck... I had it for years and couldn't figure it out. It wasn't until after I got rid of it that I saw the saying that goes something like, "The P has terrible bedroom sound, but awesome band sound."

Maybe it was Lakland in general. I'm hoping that if/when I get a LB-100 P (G&L), that it scratches that itch.
 
The stock ones, Chi-Sonics? The ones with the black ridged covers.



It does hang weird, but the shape is what I liked about it. As for the Duck... I had it for years and couldn't figure it out. It wasn't until after I got rid of it that I saw the saying that goes something like, "The P has terrible bedroom sound, but awesome band sound."

Maybe it was Lakland in general. I'm hoping that if/when I get a LB-100 P (G&L), that it scratches that itch.
Yes, they do say a P sounds great in the mix and not so great solo’d. I have to have both :)

As for thinking it may be Lākland basses in general that don’t appeal to you... that’s just not possible honestly. They have traditional neck shapes and construction, except they’re built better than the basses most of us learned how to play on. You’ve just not picked up the Lakland that gives you the sound in your head...yet.
 
Last edited:
Hi y’all, I’m looking at a couple of 55-94s right now...one from 1997 and one from 2015. Any strong opinions on either one? After diving into the threads a bit, I’m sure either will be great, but thought I’d ask. Seems the consensus is that the Lakland pickups may be perceived as slightly more aggressive sounding than the Barts? Thanks.
The Lakland LH3 preamp has several more mid frequencies you can select from than the Bart, if you’re into that kind of thing. Although some of the Lakland/Hanson 5 string pickups have a much weaker A string due to the magnet set up used, fyi. And if it’s a maple fingerboard, the older ones have better figuring.

Just my .02.
 
And if it’s a maple fingerboard, the older ones have better figuring.
True!
86FAF693-60DE-4455-A20D-C6675B094001.jpeg
 
Hi. Does anyone know when Lakland modified the LH3 5-string pickups to correct for the low output on the A string? I bought my spalted 55-02 in 2016. I haven’t noticed the lower output but I play with a lighter touch.

Also, I’m curious which mid frequency and settings people find help get that fender jazz juiciness? I dig the 55-02’s modern tone but every now and again I find myself missing my fender ADJV.

Thanks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: MAXSPINRUN
Hi. Does anyone know when Lakland modified the LH3 5-string pickups to correct for the low output on the A string? I bought my spalted 55-02 in 2016. I haven’t noticed the lower output but I play with a lighter touch.

Also, I’m curious which mid frequency and settings people find help get that fender jazz juiciness? I dig the 55-02’s modern tone but every now and again I find myself missing my fender ADJV.

Thanks!
I notice the problem on my 55-02 only when bending the A string above the 12th fret... pulling the A toward the treble side of the neck must place it between the split coils in the neck pickup. Not noticeable in most playing situations and does not do it at all with the bridge pickup. My bass is from 2010.

This just seems like a natural byproduct of the design of a side by side split coil. They could eliminate it by either using a single coil or a stacked humbucker but both of those solutions would fly in the face of the main concept of Lakland's approach for this instrument to be a chameleon that can reproduce sounds of classic basses. The P Bass tone really begs for the split coils to be side by side.
 
My new US 44-64 should be here within a month, so my wife made this artwork for me. The strings are real. They were old strings from a previous string change.
View attachment 3465103

That is really cool and better tort than I see on many basses! (Although you might want to tell her that you get better tone by running strings through the body. :D:laugh::roflmao:)