• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Lakland Owners Group #69

Ok. I’m happy. If for the neck alone, I’m good. For a supposedly “used” bass, I can’t find a mark on it And it still has the tuner condoms intact. Plus, it came with an unexpected Lakland case all for a little more than a new Skyline.

Freshly unboxed.
A4194718-F6B7-4EEB-B191-5042FBDBB5BA.jpeg


Punched it up a bit to show some grain.
69FDE94E-B733-4965-B544-18B8C8F77893.jpeg


Same for the back.
513CBB84-2F12-4361-9DE7-F179134EE4FB.jpeg


And, to answer my question from earlier, they do appear to be licensed Hipshot tuners. :(
DCA87F64-59E1-4263-879B-85552F99660B.jpeg


I’m content.

EDIT: The crew.

D80F03E0-018B-4EAE-B745-1ACD9CF89038.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Ok. I’m happy. If for the neck alone, I’m good. For a supposedly “used” bass, I can’t find a mark on it And it still has the tuner condoms intact. Plus, it came with an unexpected Lakland case all for a little more than a new Skyline.

Freshly unboxed.
View attachment 3587556

Punched it up a bit to show some grain.
View attachment 3587555

Same for the back.
View attachment 3587557

And, to answer my question from earlier, they do appear to be licensed Hipshot tuners. :(
View attachment 3587558

I’m content.

EDIT: The crew.

View attachment 3587594
It's a Lakland party!
I rarely watch late night shows but put on Jimmy Fallon in order to catch Noomi Rapace last night and noticed the Roots bass player on a 55-94. Then caught Grace Potter on Jimmy Kimmel and not sure but it looked like her bassist was playing a 4 string Lakland too.
 
Ok. I’m happy. If for the neck alone, I’m good. For a supposedly “used” bass, I can’t find a mark on it And it still has the tuner condoms intact. Plus, it came with an unexpected Lakland case all for a little more than a new Skyline.

Freshly unboxed.
View attachment 3587556

Punched it up a bit to show some grain.
View attachment 3587555

Same for the back.
View attachment 3587557

And, to answer my question from earlier, they do appear to be licensed Hipshot tuners. :(
View attachment 3587558

I’m content.

EDIT: The crew.

View attachment 3587594

Awesome wall of Fame!!!
 
So I’ve been sitting with my new 55-14 for a couple days now, just getting to know it and spending time learning it’s secrets and it’s personality. Ultimately I’m trying to determine whether they are worth the extra money over a 55-02 all things considered. While I went into it expecting a small step up in playability with the oiled neck (super nice) and rolled frets (negligible), I wasn’t anticipating a significant difference in tones/sounds due to using the same electronics. I was wrong. Really wrong.

This is a lively bass with a depth of tone that surprised me. I use the exact same Lakland steel strings on my primary 55-02D and have used them on my Bart equipped 55-02 but the 55-14 just makes them sound rather dark by comparison. Now, I attribute a percentage of this to being buyer’s justification but I also think a combination of the bone nut, the quarter-sawn neck, and the alder body have combined to make it sonically more responsive and growly than the ash/maple or ash/maple/rosewood combinations of my 55-02’s. It’s a completely different animal.

I guess it all comes down to one point; I was expecting redundancy and ended up with a very different bass, sonically speaking. Visually, it is very understated and will not turn many heads. I’m ok with that as I want this to be a player that doesn’t draw a lot of attention between sets. It has confirmed for me that I will own a 55-94 at some point as it does appear to be a much bigger step-up over the 55-02 than I expected.

TL : DR I have to keep them all. :thumbsup:;):)
 
Last edited:
Seriously... I've never tried a Roscoe but the lh3 electronics provide are of variability.... It has a unique sounds but also can cop a really nice J bass or mm sounds and ... To a bit of a lesser extent a P bass sound.

Here is the link to some sound for on the Lakland was site

Invalid Link Removed

Here's is a link to an lh3 demo on YouTube

 
I have a buddy that has a like new Deluxe for sale but I can’t try it in person. I wondered what I could expect tonally and how they compare to say a Roscoe or other basses in this price range?

View attachment 3590874 View attachment 3590875
Each US Lakland is its own kind of tone monster. They’re all winners, IME, but will all have their own personality.

I bought my first Lakland, a 55-94, having never played a Lakland. It became the gold standard that I compared every other bass against.

I would say buy it with no worries at all. It will produce all the tones you could ever want!
 
Last edited:
I have a buddy that has a like new Deluxe for sale but I can’t try it in person. I wondered what I could expect tonally and how they compare to say a Roscoe or other basses in this price range?

View attachment 3590874 View attachment 3590875

I’ve owned a few Roscoes - amazing instruments. They have a sound that’s very much unique and pleasing - the playability is good, but nothing like a Lakland. The best compliment on bass tone I ever received was from a 44-02 - that 55-94 will have it in spades. Don’t hesitate!