• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Lakland Owners Group #69

From what I've heard it kind of depends on which of the Skylines you have, my Indonesian Skyline 55-02 and my U.S. 55-94 are almost exactly the same weight. @ 8.5 lbs.

I guess the 55-94 is just weighted and balanced better. So it feels lighter on my shoulders. Hard to say.
It does depend on the model. The smaller bodied 44/55-01s and 02s should weigh less than my slab bodied 44-51.
 
image.jpg

My 55-02.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GregC
Has anyone modded their 55-94 or similar to have a passive tone control? My bass has the Bartolini preamp which doesn’t include a passive tone. My tech says he’ll need to route a space for another control in order to add a passive tone. Not sure if it’s worth the hassle. Other preamps have passive tone controls and perhaps it’s easier to swap out the pre if it is that important to me.
I’d need to source another knob for the extra control pot. Does anyone know what type of control knobs Lakland use on the 55-94? Are they easily sourced?
 
Has anyone modded their 55-94 or similar to have a passive tone control? My bass has the Bartolini preamp which doesn’t include a passive tone. My tech says he’ll need to route a space for another control in order to add a passive tone. Not sure if it’s worth the hassle. Other preamps have passive tone controls and perhaps it’s easier to swap out the pre if it is that important to me.
I’d need to source another knob for the extra control pot. Does anyone know what type of control knobs Lakland use on the 55-94? Are they easily sourced?
Sometimes wondered about a passive tone control as well. Could it not work as a stack knob? The other issue is that there's a significant volume drop in passive mode, and whilst that can be adjusted with an internal gain trim control, Lakland don't recommend it AFAIK.
As to the knows they use, that style is pretty common, but I'm sure you could just ask Lakland direct.
Peace, SoundSupport
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fred312b
I was playing my US Lakland 44-64 P bass and my Fender American Pro P bass this evening, comparing the two. While the Lakland is definitely higher quality, the Fender is more comfortable for my right (plucking) arm, because the body is more contoured at the forearm than the Lakland. I’m curious why Lakland doesn’t choose to have more of a contour there, like Fender. It makes a noticeable difference in comfort. Still, in comparing my two P basses, it’s clear that the Lakland is easily the better quality of the two.
 
Last edited:
I was playing my US Lakland 44-64 P bass and my Fender American Pro P bass this evening, comparing the two. While the Lakland is definitely higher quality, the Fender is more comfortable for my right (plucking) arm, because the body is more contoured at the forearm than the Lakland. I’m curious why Lakland doesn’t choose to have more of a contour there, like Fender. It makes a noticeable difference in comfort. Still, in comparing my two P basses, it’s clear that the Lakland is easily the better quality of the two.
Just compared my Skyline 44-64 GZ and my MIJ Fender ‘70s P. The contours look exactly the same. So, it must be a US made thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: basspraiser
Just compared my Skyline 44-64 GZ and my MIJ Fender ‘70s P. The contours look exactly the same. So, it must be a US made thing.
Also possible the MIJ has the thicker, less-contoured body. I haven’t owned a Skyline, but I’ve looked at pics, and they appear to have the same body shaping as my US 44-64. I could be wrong about that though. But there’s a definite difference of the body thickness and contouring at the forearm between my US Fender P and US Lakland P. I think that’s the one aspect I like better about the Fender. The Lakland is superior in every other way.
 
I was playing my US Lakland 44-64 P bass and my Fender American Pro P bass this evening, comparing the two. While the Lakland is definitely higher quality, the Fender is more comfortable for my right (plucking) arm, because the body is more contoured at the forearm than the Lakland. I’m curious why Lakland doesn’t choose to have more of a contour there, like Fender. It makes a noticeable difference in comfort. Still, in comparing my two P basses, it’s clear that the Lakland is easily the better quality of the two.

Maybe it's a way to not make a " Fender" so as to not be in violation of any trademarks etc?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MAXSPINRUN
If anybody wants to read what transpired over the last two days, and how luck led me to finding the cause of the Red B!+ch’s phase issue: 3 Pickup Bass Phase Issue Questions

I also was able to fix the problem!! She now has a tiny phase switch. She’s changed a lot since I got her: removed two switches, added two mini pots for the P, converted the lipsticks to solderless and gave them an EMG preamp, routed for and installed two 9V battery boxes, bought an active 2 channel mixer pedal for the 2 outputs so I can equal out volumes and use just 1 amp, and lastly I routed more room under her hood and put in the phase mini switch. Oh.... and I had 3 headaches today. She was worth it though, and has truly earned her name!

Edit: Just weighed her and she’s lost 0.4 and only weighs 11 pounds!! All that routing paid off!
9794E7F6-3B02-4903-8DF9-7A2239481A2E.jpeg
2D6211D3-1E98-48FA-BECB-30CC2EBB0097.jpeg
 
Last edited: