• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Language Snobber on TB

Status
Not open for further replies.
cudn't work how to edit the title, didn't put much effort in tho cos i havn't got the time. sorry

No time to format a proper reply? Ludicrous! This whole thread and your 5 - 10 posts in it are nothing if not a complete waste of time. If you have something worth writing, write it so someone can read it.

Even your errors in this timewasting thread could have easily been fixed if you would just take the time to read what you are writing.

Its not very hard, and it doesn't take much time.

P.S. I write in complete sentences with real words on AIM. Start doing it, it gets easier.

It would take me longer to write one sentence in "txt" than it did to write this whole post.
 
Basicly, I'm fed up of being attacked for using words such as u or gd, which are perfectly understandable, just because is incorrect grammer.
There are a few arguments for my point which i would like to point out but avoid too much detail:
1. evolution of the english language; you might not like it but its happening more and more I am seeing posters (particularly aimed and young people (who are of course the future)) using txt messaging slang, and shortening of words, it's going to become more and more comon use so get used to it
2. ease of entering, I type at about 60 words per minute maybe even alittle faster, when typing at that speed the time saved by writing u rather than you is achully significant
3. spelling, if i don't know how it is spelled, i spell it phonetically, if you can't read a phonetic spelling then please learn to talk, as you written english is clearly vastly superior to your spoken english.
4. snobbery, why pick up on something that you clearly understand but just don't like the way its written, we're all different, and we all have different manorisms and colloquialisms embrace people for who they are, including they're typed language, even if it is very comon or even Dawg speak.

Sorry about the rant, but i was fed up
I still love you all xx

What it boils down to is this: WHAT you know doesn't matter if you can't communicate it clearly. Same for questions - your need is irrelevant if others cannot clearly understand what you want to know.

If you want to be understood, it's easy:

1) Keyboard carefully;
2) Use conventional and well accepted spelling and punctuation;
3) Make your communication clear and easy to understand.

If you refuse to do these things, YOU are the one who loses out. Your loss, not ours.

Completely unapologetic here. :D
 
With all due respect, you misunderstood me. I do not mean to adapt the language to yourself, but to adapt yourself to the language. You don't just gloss over it and ignore it when you hit a wrong note on your bass, do you? Same concept.

no I stop the whole tune and gig and make sure every1 new I made a mistake!:rollno:
 
No time to format a proper reply? Ludicrous! This whole thread and your 5 - 10 posts in it are nothing if not a complete waste of time. If you have something worth writing, write it so someone can read it.

Even your errors in this timewasting thread could have easily been fixed if you would just take the time to read what you are writing.

Its not very hard, and it doesn't take much time.

P.S. I write in complete sentences with real words on AIM. Start doing it, it gets easier.

It would take me longer to write one sentence in "txt" than it did to write this whole post.

o I'm sorry that you didn't understand any of post my "waste of time posts" to respond to this waste of time, (good use of your time btw 2)

also i am not writing in txt form, i'm writing in a slightly modified version of proper english that has evolved for me, just live with it as you clearly don't struggle to read it. by all means ignore me, if your prejudices enough to think i'm an idiot and not worth your time, then i probably won't enjoy reading your response.

love and kisses and all the hippy shiz i love xxx
 
Oh, now you're just being dramatic...

No, you don't stop the tune, but you keep it in mind and try not to make the mistake again in the future, right?

no i gloss over it and ignor it because if i don't look like i've noticed no1 else will, and i won't make that mistake again because i no the songs i'm playing, or its improv.
 
no i gloss over it and ignor it because if i don't look like i've noticed no1 else will, and i won't make that mistake again because i no the songs i'm playing, or its improv.
Strange... so you're basically saying while you fix your mistakes in your bass playing, you're content to keep making the same ones over and over again in your typing...

To continue the comparison with bass playing, I would say what you're describing is much like playing a song incorrectly and instead of fixing the mistakes, you continue to make them over and over in the hopes that either no one will notice or they will humor you and let it go.
 
Strange... so you're basically saying while you fix your mistakes in your bass playing, you're content to keep making the same ones over and over again in your typing...

To continue the comparison with bass playing, I would say what you're describing is much like playing a song incorrectly and instead of fixing the mistakes, you continue to make them over and over in the hopes that either no one will notice or they will humor you and let it go.

theyre not mistakes, to keep your metaphor going, what i'm doing is an obscure electro or jazz fusion line, using alittle bit of atonal improv, not everyone likes it, and somepeople think its a discrace to music, but its original and how i've always done it and i'm not gunna change what i like for people who I don't even know.
 
theyre not mistakes, to keep your metaphor going, what i'm doing is an obscure electro or jazz fusion line, using alittle bit of atonal improv, not everyone likes it, and somepeople think its a discrace to music, but its original and how i've always done it and i'm not gunna change what i like for people who I don't even know.
...Point taken. However, playing the Star Spangled Banner in F# Harmonic minor using atonal improv would upset an awful lot of people, now wouldn't it?
 
raj, Your original post was described by you as a rant. Specifically, it appeared to be aimed at the very people who've chosen to respond. They disagree with you on the matter. It shouldn't be difficult to understand or accept. For you to continue to rant in defense of your position is wasted effort. You won't change the opinions of others on this. Accept it.


Something to consider:

If you are right in your position & everyone is wrong, stick with it.
If you are wrong in your position & everyone else is right, you may want to reconsider. Only you can decide which is which, because we haven't made a positive impression on you.
 
...Point taken. However, playing the Star Spangled Banner in F# Harmonic minor using atonal improv would upset an awful lot of people, now wouldn't it?

lol, that achully sounds quite fun, i'm really not a fan of patriotism or stereo types. have you seen BORAT? very funny film, that man (who btw is a british comedian not a asian presenter (sorry to point that out if you knew but some people don't))

but back to the point, I think people are much too up tight about keeping language pure, let it develop because its not going to stop just because you don't like it, embrace it.
 
raj, Your original post was described by you as a rant. Specifically, it appeared to be aimed at the very people who've chosen to respond. They disagree with you on the matter. It shouldn't be difficult to understand or accept. For you to continue to rant in defense of your position is wasted effort. You won't change the opinions of others on this. Accept it.


Something to consider:

If you are right in your position & everyone is wrong, stick with it.
If you are wrong in your position & everyone else is right, you may want to reconsider. Only you can decide which is which, because we haven't made a positive impression on you.

1 my name isn't raj, tho i wouldn't mind if it was
2 that works in both directions, the reason why i started this post was to discuss not to point out, but to discuss and maybe change my or other peoples opinions, i'm grateful that all the responses so far have been pleasent and non-inflamitory and i'm achully finding this quite interesting and entertaining
 
lol, that achully sounds quite fun, i'm really not a fan of patriotism or stereo types. have you seen BORAT? very funny film, that man (who btw is a british comedian not a asian presenter (sorry to point that out if you knew but some people don't))

but back to the point, I think people are much too up tight about keeping language pure, let it develop because its not going to stop just because you don't like it, embrace it.

To jump in...some like to embrace the latest trendy way of bastardizing the English language (1337, ebonics, etc.) But some like to embrace proper English.
Personally, I couldn't care less how you speak. I also don't care how you type in your threads. I would not read one of your threads that contained an abundance of text speak (if it did) because it annoys me and I find it difficult to read.
But I have the option of clicking myself right out of that thread and continuing blissfully on about my day.
The only time it gets personal to me is if someone tries to speak/type/text me using that kind of language. Then I get very frustrated and annoyed and demand they either speak properly to me or not at all.
 
lol, that achully sounds quite fun, i'm really not a fan of patriotism or stereo types. have you seen BORAT? very funny film, that man (who btw is a british comedian not a asian presenter (sorry to point that out if you knew but some people don't))

but back to the point, I think people are much too up tight about keeping language pure, let it develop because its not going to stop just because you don't like it, embrace it.
That may be, but at least I'll have the fortune of being understood when I really have something to say. And don't be surprised when you and those who think as you do "develop" our language right back into it's original form...

...A bunch of grunts and hoots accompanied by random thrusts with a pointy stick. :D
 
I'd say that the rebuttals to your "rant" aren't so much about keeping it "pure" as they are about making an intelligible effort to communicate clearly. As far as your comment about allowing language to "develop" here's what dictionary.com has to say:
dictionary.com said:
de·vel·op Audio Help /dɪˈvɛləp/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[di-vel-uhp] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–verb (used with object) 1. to bring out the capabilities or possibilities of; bring to a more advanced or effective state: to develop natural resources; to develop one's musical talent.
2. to cause to grow or expand: to develop one's muscles.
3. to elaborate or expand in detail: to develop a theory.
4. to bring into being or activity; generate; evolve.
5. Drafting. to transfer the details of (a more or less two-dimensional design, pattern, or the like) from one surface, esp. one that is prismatic or cylindrical, onto another, usually planar, in such a way that the distances between points remain the same.
6. Biology. a. to cause to go through the process of natural evolution from a previous and lower stage.
b. to cause to progress from an embryonic to an adult form.
7. Mathematics. to express in an extended form, as in a series.
8. Music. to unfold, by various technical means, the inherent possibilities of (a theme).
9. Photography. a. to render visible (the latent image on an exposed film or the like).
b. to treat (an exposed film or the like) with chemicals so as to render the latent image visible.
10. Chess. to bring (a piece) into effective play, esp. during the initial phase of a game when pieces are moved from their original position on the board: He developed his rook by castling.
11. Mining. to prepare (a new mine) for working by digging access openings and building necessary structures.
–verb (used without object)
12. to grow into a more mature or advanced state; advance; expand: She is developing into a good reporter.
13. to come gradually into existence or operation; be evolved.
14. to be disclosed; become evident or manifest: The plot of the novel developed slowly.
15. to undergo developing, as a photographic film.
16. Biology. a. to progress from an embryonic to an adult form.
b. to progress from earlier to later stages of ontogeny or phylogeny.
c. to reach sexual maturity.

The bolded sections are my emphasis. How does using txtspeak cause language to develop? "Evolve" is a possible term for you to use, but don't be surprised when people resist what is more accurately "devolve" :D
 
but back to the point, I think people are much too up tight about keeping language pure, let it develop because its not going to stop just because you don't like it, embrace it.

Just to dig into your brain a little bit: what do you think of ebonics? There was a push a few years ago to actually legitimize it, which was roundly criticized and eventually dropped. Even those who could be considered to speak ebonics are embarrassed by the term.

Now, I live in New Orleans, which is predominantly populated by black people, and is also know for having some rather colorful dialects. I talk with people of all colors and all walks of life, but some of my fellow New Orleanians are completely unintelligible to me. I personally think that some of these people who speak in very thick accents/slang/mushmouth/ebonics (or whatever you want to call it) refuse to speak properly even though they can, just to mess with me. Some of my black friends down here speak quite a bit differently to me than they do to their black friends. Is it laziness or is it simply adapting to make oneself better understood? Methinks it's important for the speaker to make themselves understood to the audience, not the other way around.
 
My point is pretty simple regarding this topic.
If you can't take the time to write a question in proper English, I don't have the time to answer it.
Right on the money!! The OP is kinda full of himself as evidenced by such a long, silly tirade of questionable merit. Couldn't we all just argue about Global Warming or some other rather beat-to-death subject? But promoting the "future" of shortening English words? Spelling them 'phonetically' because one is not to "be bothered" with correct spelling? Utter nonsense!! .. :eyebrow:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts