By the way, it's coming in at 9 pounds exactly, on the bathroom scale. It feels heavier than that somehow.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
A 4003 is 1/4" thick, so I don't think thickness would be an issue, but weight can be an issue. I'd have to see what the weight differencial is between the Kahler and a complete stock assembly.Thanks. Actually, I'd be afraid to install the Kahler whammy in a Ric. Looking at the body thickness, I'm not sure there's enough depth. I sunk the body on mine 1/2" lower than the fretboard, after reading through some of the Kahler installs I've seen. The saddles sit pretty high off the body, so in many cases, they had to sink the Kahler into the body to get the action right. And the rout without sinking the bridge has to be about 3/4" for it to work. Additionally, I think it's interfering with sustain, or maybe it's clarity. Likely because it's not a solid mechanical connection with the body, with all those springs and cams. It's super heavy - likely over a pound as well. That said, I have seen a Ric or two with the Kahler over on the Tremolo Fanatics message board.
That is beautiful, TRC and all! Can't wait to hear it. That headstock is really striking when you pose it next to the 4003. RIC should hire you.
All the other basses look so ordinary next to it.![]()
A 4003 is 1/4" thick, so I don't think thickness would be an issue, but weight can be an issue. I'd have to see what the weight differencial is between the Kahler and a complete stock assembly.
All the other basses look so ordinary next to it.![]()