• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Les Claypool's New Bass!

Please do. :)

Sorry about that, didn't check this thread for a few days.

The Last Salmon Man:

Delta waters divert to other places,
To help nourish central valley seeds.
River water that slosh on desert fairways,
Fullfill So.Cal golfers needs.

Jimmy Mac runs the trawler of his father,
Who got it passed down from his Pa.
Three closed seasons and a bank note on his shoulder,
Now Jimmys hidin' from the law.

2010 they opened NorCal waters,
To the salmon chasing slew.
4 straight days Jimmy trolled the jagged coastline,
But the fish were far and few.

Jimmy watched as the bulk of the fleet,
Packed their boats and moved away.
But after the stroke he promised to his father,
He'd do his best to stay...in Bodega Bay.

He remembered the days when his father used to show him,
How to set and tend all the gear.
With his hand on his shoulder,
He looked out at the water (he said "ocean" instead of water live) and said
"Son, it is my fear"...

And then the chorus of "You're the last salmon man".
 
OK, I'll just put it out there.

I really don't like it at all.

And that makes me sad. As a huge Claypool fan who has always dreamed of there one day being a Claypool signature bass, I have to say that I am really disappointed. For several reasons...

1. Oh god, not another Fenderesque headstock. It's been done to death. And with almost endless ways to shape a headstock, I have do idea why so many builders are just rehashing the same design. I expected something a little more creative from Les.

2. The body is really boring. Albeit in an unconventional shape, every other aspect is lack luster. It's devoid of any contour or carving, no interesting wood choices/placement, and it's basically just flat and generic. If you look at any of Les' other basses you will see shinning examples of everything that this bass is not.

3. Just a P-pickup?! Why? Once again, look at Les' other basses. NO P-PICKUPS. So why put one on his Signature bass?

4. All in all, it looks like a highschool wood shop project... that's not quite done yet... ugh.

It's starting to look less like this is a Les Claypool signature bass and more like this is a weird bass that only Les Claypool is weird enough to put his name on. The only thing about it that is remotely Claypoolish is that the upper horn "sort of" resembles the ones on his CT basses.

I'm really hoping that this one is a very early prototype that he wanted to take for a test drive and not the finished product, because if that is what will be hitting the shelves I'm going to be really bummed out.