• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Look at this P bass....

"Much, much less expensive" and "Not for sale"

I know what you meant, but if you think about what you said, it doesn't really make sense, it's only $10 but I'm not selling it! So, if you're not selling it, it doesn't have a price, which makes it, by default, priceless.

When no-one is selling the good ones, then the rest become higher and higher priced... or apparently, if they have a story.

My point is that they can be found and had. I bought this 10 years ago when the market was stronger and prices were higher. I looked hard for this and paid dearly for it as I am not by any means well to do. Still, it was considerably less than 1/3 the cost of the bass originally mentioned in this thread. I live in a small market compared to most of TB's members, yet vintage instruments turn up here regularly. If you want one, you can find one. The only reason I stated mine wasn't for sale is because it's not, socioeconomic interpretations be damned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gsquare and Sartori
For some reason I really only like the RW look on Fender stuff. I owned a RW briefly and it was a great bass, they did a good job on it. But if I see that look on pretty much any other bass it makes me cringe a little to be quite honest.
For me it's mainly Fenders, and beyond that, for road wear to look cool, the bass has to be solid colored originally.

I know. But here's the thing…

My Ripper is a '74. I bought it new and I'm its sole owner. It's been played daily for virtually every day of the 15,000+ days I've had it - and steadily gigged (at least up until two years ago) as well - nor has it been babied very much. I bought it as a 'player,' and that's the life it's lived. But it still doesn't show 1/50th the amount of wear the average RW Fender I've seen has.

So with a few relatively rare exceptions, who are all the barbarians who would have supposedly put a Fender bass in the condition the RW look implies they have? It just strikes me a something cooked up for the kiddies and the non-musicians out there. (Y'know, just like the one about how all metal bands are heavily into the occult?)

It just seems so…civilian…or la tourista to me. As in: "Is that real road wear - or is it just some Sears road wear?" to paraphrase Frank Zappa.

Those of us who actually do own and play (and many times slaved and/or saved up to buy) a decent bass don't tend to beat the tar out of our instruments. For obvious and good reasons.
Were Fender finishes really that fragile back in the day? I don't know.

It just occurred to me why it's priced so high. $17K is the "we don't really wanna sell it" price.

They're a brick 'n mortar store. Having vintage guitars on display in your music store brings in a lot of foot traffic. Good for business all around.

Even so, they don't know what they're talking about concerning this particular bass.
Good point.
 
I wonder if the tuners were put in cockeyed because installing them straight would have put some of the screws too close to the old screw holes. Obviously the "right" thing to do would have been to get the tuners that matched the pattern, but I'm guessing the owner was too busy to sweat it. (Plus, IMO it was way harder to find out that kind of detail before the internet, except for wizard techs probably.)

Once you get into the realm of mojo and objects where provenance contributes to the collectible "value," I don't know if non-original parts are really as critical. I mean, if someone is interested in a 50s P-bass just because it is a 50s P-bass, then the original pickup matters. But if someone is interested in a particular 50s P-bass because it was played by one person for decades and on stage with famous people, then maybe it matters more to have the pickup that was on stage with the famous people. (I'm not in the market for it and can't really assess value here.)
 
This bass screams MOJO: :bassist::bassist::bassist:

inpqoi9ompywccxnggbb.jpg
 
My point is that they can be found and had. I bought this 10 years ago when the market was stronger and prices were higher. I looked hard for this and paid dearly for it as I am not by any means well to do. Still, it was considerably less than 1/3 the cost of the bass originally mentioned in this thread. I live in a small market compared to most of TB's members, yet vintage instruments turn up here regularly. If you want one, you can find one. The only reason I stated mine wasn't for sale is because it's not, socioeconomic interpretations be damned.
I know, and you're right, I just enjoy a good irony.

Nice bass you've got, at any price
 
  • Like
Reactions: bassie12
E string looks far more into the neck than the G, almost as if the neck had been tilted somehow or the bridge or nut poorly placed. couldn't they put the G string UNDER its retainer in the headstock? and the worst part by all means: the broken handle... :roflmao:

I bet it's unplayable and the truss rod doesn't work at all...

I've had and played bad instruments, this is one!
 
Last edited: