Everyone is making a big deal about whether the move to asia killed Ampeg.
A previous poster said that it's about value. Now, for example, if Fender decided to close up shop in Corona CA and move their entire production line to Mexico what would you say? I'm sure the Mexican Fender plant could make the current MIA line to the exact same specs. If they were to chop 40% off their prices then I think you wouldn't hear too much complaining. However, if they wanted to continue to charge $1600 for a Mexican made 57 P-Bass reissue, I think you'd see Fender tank.
This is what LOUD did with Ampeg. Moved the production line to Asia, but kept prices the same. Heck, with all the cost-cutting that accomplished, net profit should have been WAAAY up! No, the Asia move, to me, reeks of reaction. I think the company was already headed for the toilet before they axed the USA plant. It was a bold cost-cutting move to save them from disaster. Tons of gear is made overseas and those companies are doing fine. LOUD was a victim of financial mismanagement and corporate incompetence. It just took a while before the **** really hit the fan.
it's not just about perceived values..
it's that the prices stayed the same, the product's QC went into the crapper..
if even if fender moved to mexico and dropped their prices 40%, but the quality of the product dropped dramatically.. there would be alot of complaints.. and they would fold..
this is the problem.. if the quality of the product was the same as USA built and the prices were the same, there would be some complaints about the marquee being moved over-seas.. but, the product would still sell..
it's all about how the QC fell off dramatically when they moved to Vietnam and how they stiffed all the SLM workers..
all in all, it's a horrible situation for Ampeg to be in..
because, even if someone bought Ampeg.. what would they be able to do with it?? move it back to the USA?? keep it in Vietnam?? move it to China?? and then, they would have to repair the damage that LOUD has done to the name..

