• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Marcus Miller is 100% right!

So what does Marcus think about his covers of vocal tunes (and playing those vocal melodies on bass)?

Marcus Miller doesn't do covers where he totally above the twelfth fret and he doesn't use a piccolo bass. I would say he is consistent. He also can play bass clarinet when he wants to feature that texture too.
 
These "Shorts" are designed to compete with Tik Tok, which is a shame. For all of YouTube's faults, it's willingness to host long form discussions is invaluable.

I'm reasonably sure I agree with what he was saying, but there was no way to include any elaboration in the brief time allotted for the video.

Exactly, it is a 'dumbing down' of content. Comments clipped and presented without context. I'm not a fan of this format in general.
 
I'm not looking to be offended. I simply see a contradiction in what he's saying given how many vocal melodies he's played on bass.
Stop chewing the sound byte and look at the entire portrait of the artist.
Why must it be a contradiction? As bass players it behooves us to master as much about music as possible. Period. Playing an effective melody and a stylistically appropriate melodically supportive bass line and appreciating the very unique and special powers of our chosen instrument do not preclude the other but make us more complete as bass players or musicians who play bass. MM can play killer melodies, bass lines and create spontaneous music because he understands that, more bass players need to embrace those ideals rather than placing artificial limitations.
 
I'd say that he is right but his wording was sloppy. Every instrument has a unique voice and that should be taken advantage of in the writing.

The problem with his comment is that it can be taken out of context by the "bass should stick to its job" as him stating that you should not play melody on the bass or above the 5th fret, or not play a line originally written for another instrument which is clearly not what he is saying.
 
Is the type of playing he seems to be referencing even that pervasive? I can't remember the last time I heard a song with a noodly bass melody sitting on top. I'd argue that type of playing is fine in the context of soloing on jazz tunes a la Pattitucci though.

Lead bass melodies are pretty common in Smooth Jazz. I am pretty sure Marcus Miller was referring go that scene.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Scot and Mastermold
I'd say that he is right but his wording was sloppy. Every instrument has a unique voice and that should be taken advantage of in the writing.

The problem with his comment is that it can be taken out of context by the "bass should stick to its job" as him stating that you should not play melody on the bass or above the 5th fret, or not play a line originally written for another instrument which is clearly not what he is saying.

Even in that short excerpt I don't see how you could get that. He was giving example from Stanley Clarke that demonstrate pretty clearly what he is talking about. In the full interview, he demonstrated some Jaco lines that made his point too.
 
Even in that short excerpt I don't see how you could get that. He was giving example from Stanley Clarke that demonstrate pretty clearly what he is talking about. In the full interview, he demonstrated some Jaco lines that made his point too.
I'm not sure which part of my response you are referring to.

If it's the part about instruments having their own voice; that's what he is demonstrating with the Stanley Clark reference put into my own words.

For the second part of my response; it was just my reaction to the comments and watching the video again (watched the full interview when it came out). Probably the one talk bass hill I will die on is about the opinion that there is a proper way to use a bass guitar.
 
I take what he is saying is that things should be ARRANGED for the instrument. Not necessarily to say that a melody has to be written for a single instrument only. For instance if i am going to play a Stevie Wonder melody on bass, i am going to re-interpret that melody to be played on the bass and it is not going to be an exact replica of how Stevie sang it. That's my takeaway.
 

Latest posts